12 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
jluken says:
To cbs news. While I think that you are trying to get the message out, you are forgetting one very important thing -- the doctor. Your readers and listners all need to know that they need a surgeon or someone who specializes in colonoscopys. DO NOT go to your family practitioner or any run of the mill doctor. My father walked in for a routine colonoscopy on Jan 10,2007 and was dead 2 weeks to the day later. He had gone to his regular doctor who told him everything would be fine until that doctor punctured his colon during the procedure. So then it was emergency surgery to go in and repair the colon. Which meant cutting about an 8-10 in. incision down his mid-section. There were many things that happened that should not of at that hospital and with the doctors. He was 76 years old and was not having any problems at all with his bowels. For those of you older people not having any problems I would strongly urge you to think twice. And if you do have it done please make sure the doctor specializes in colonoscopies. He left a wife and 6 grown children and 14 grandchildren that miss him.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
jluken says:
to cbs news. while i think that you are trying to get the message out, you are forgetting one very important thing -- the doctor. your readers and listners all need to know that they need a surgeon or someone who specializes in colonoscopys. DO NOT go to your family practitioner or any run of the mill doctor. My father walked in for a routine colonoscopy on Jan 10,2007 and was dead 2 weeks to the day later. He had gone to his regular doctor who told him everything would be fine until that doctor punctured his colon during the procedure. So then it was emergency surgery to go in and repair the colon. Which means cutting about an 8-10 in. incision down his mid-section. There were many things that happened that should not of at that hospital and with the doctors.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
torocaca says:
"...if there isn't any history of cancer in your family, don't waste your time and money on this very inconvenient procedure." Posted by mswolfestock

BAAAAAD ADVICE! Only one polyp was found in my intestine and it was removed during the procedure, through which I slept. If I had ignored the Dr's advice, which I am prone to do, it could have been 5, or 10 or more polyps by the time I made up my own mind to get it done.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
marrofkane says:
It's not bad if you are sedated sufficiently, I was completely knocked out for 2 of my colonoscopies. What WAS very uncomfortable was a sigmoidoscopy, where they don't go in as far, but NO sedation. Severe cramping was felt in that case.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
rright-2009 says:
I'm keeping count of all the negative republican vs negative democrat articles on this site. So far, it almost 10:1 against republicans. No bias here.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
martinab1 says:
I had my first colonoscopy 1.5 years ago, the doctor found 9 polyps so I am destined to repeat this every two years until the polyps are non-existant. So with 6 months until the next one, I am already dreading the prep more than the procedure.

Given the alternative and having worked in a cancer clinic, the procedure is not that bad and beats the heck out of not having it done, and finding out that the cancer has gone to other organs. Then you can be in a mess!
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
uwishunu36 says:
to all those that think screen is not needed i am a 37 year old male and 2 years ago i was at work just thought i had the flu i continued to work all day bay the end of the day the pain in my gut was unbearable so i wnet to the hospital after a number of teat the determined i had a upper sigmoid colon rupture they operated it turn out to be colon cancer stage IIIc i had no family history of colon cancer and no symtoms leading up to this so i urge everyone no matter what thier age to get screened
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
godofredo29 says:
Colonoscopies remind me of cytoscopies, or cystoscopies, where the doctor forces a probe up the urethra in order to examine the bladder. You're told that the discomfort will be minor and you have to ask to be given a general anesthesia. The procedure is excrutiating and sometimes takes a week for you to recover.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
snnicholas says:
I've had two colonoscopies so far and both were absolute nightmares! In both cases, I told the doctor (different doctors at Johns Hopkins) that I'm allergic to sulfiting agents which are often used as preservatives in the meds they give you when you have such a procedure. However, they did not do their homework and find drugs that would do just as good a job at sedating me. I was wide awake, felt everything, and it was horrible.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
sbbherve says:
I have had Colon Cancer since 1996. I was diag. at age 36yrs. I have had 8 procedures since than.
I have carcinoid colon cancer, which means it travels. I have had chemo 4x's. The procedure for colon screening is extremly painful for me and many others. To have the Dr. you interveiwed saying"It's not painful"is a lie. 70% of the people I have talked to have told me it is extremly painful. The one's that don't feel anything are usually "lightweights,Cheap dates"
meaning it takes little pain meds. I have been held down screaming in all the procedures.Dr's don't want to give a lot of pain meds. When I saw Katie Curic's colon procedure she was heavily sedated. That is usually not the case in normal procedures
Sincerely,
Stacy Benoist-Herve'
reply
1/2