Comments on: Analysis: The Economy And The Clinton Vote
Clinton Backers Were Especially Concerned About The Economy And Their Financial Situation
Add a Comment See all 50 Comments
- I miss Hillary so much... She had the best positions on the issues--especially the economy. And, she could brilliantly explain complex issues/programs, without notes or teleprompter. Now we''re left with a choice between two guys that don''t know squat about the economy, and frankly, could care less. What a shame for our poor country! Obama really looks unenthusiastic and tired these days. No fire in the belly. November should be very interesting...
- Reply to this comment
- Update: Here%u2019s Larry Johnson%u2019s update. If this plays out to be true, there will be a tape showing Michelle Obama and Farrakhan railing against %u201CWhitey%u201D!
Also, a relationship between Obama and the Nation of Islam will be revealed.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by trracymorgan at 12:59 PM : Jun 13, 2008
LIAR! You are a bald-faced blatant liar. There is no truth in this and I''m starting to doubt there is any truth in you. - Reply to this comment
- . . .When he was harrassed and stalked by that Stupid Bimbo, Monique what''''s her face, Bill soldierded on . . .
Posted by magda61 at 11:41 AM : Jun 13, 2008
Excuse me--"harrassed and stalked" by Monica? Bless your heart, you have lost ALL contact with reality. I don''t hate Bill and I really didn''t care that Monica gave him a b-j (I would have too) and I resented the taxpayer money spent on impeachment proceedings over said b-j, but blaming this on her harrassing and stalking him is pure hogwash. That "stain" didn''t get on Monica''s blue jumper all by itself. - Reply to this comment
- THE NATION WILL LIVE TO REGRET WHAT THE COURT HAS DONE TODAY,,,
VOTE DEMONIC-RAT AT YOUR PERIL,,,
DEMONIC-RAT UN-SUPREME COURT JUDGES TRASH THE CONSTITUTION,,,
Scalia asserted that the decision will have dire consequences. He warned that some detainees will be freed and return to war against America: "The nation will live to regret what the court has done today."
Supreme Court maintains post-9/11 course on Gitmo
The Supreme Court''''''''s 5-4 decision Thursday declaring for the first time that Guantanamo detainees have a constitutional right to a hearing in U.S. courts is a milestone. It also reinforces a familiar court pattern in the post-9/11 world of insisting on judicial review of detainee cases.
http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/judicial/2008-06-12-court-pattern_N.htm
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/06/12/supremecourt/main4175226.shtml - Reply to this comment
- PS. WHY ARE WE STILL SEEING CLINTONS FACE? THIS TIME NEXT YEAR SHE WILL GET RID OF THAT CHEATING HUSBAND OF HERS. HE WAS THE DESMISE FOF HER CAMPAIGN.
- Reply to this comment
- OBAMA HAS NO EXPERIANCE RUNNING A BUSINESS- NO EXPERIANCE ON FOREIGN POLICY, NO EXPERIANCE MAKING TOUGH DECISIONS, NO EXPERIANCE IN GOVERNMENT THAT QUALIFIES HIM TO LEAD A COUNTRY. HIS PLANS TO RAISE TAXES WILL DESTROY THIS COUNTRY. BOTH HIM AND HIS WIFE INNATELY HATE THIS COUNTRY AND THINK THEY CAN CHANGE IT- CHANGE CAN BE VERY BAD- IF YOU ARE NOT CAREFUL!
- Reply to this comment
- TAKE NO PRISONERS,,,
we have defeated fascist nazi terrorislam before,,,
after america became a country,,, fascist nazi terrorislam demanded that america pay protection money or they would attack americas ships and enslave all on board,,,
thomas jefferson and james madison was having non of that,,, and they sent americas military to kick fascist nazi terrorislams arses in barbary war one and barbary war two,,, why two wars,,, fascist nazi terrorislamists break treaties,,, sound familiar??? can you say iraq,,,
It is a settled policy of America, that as peace is better than war, war is better than tribute. The United States, while they wish for war with no nation, will buy peace with none. President James Madison - Reply to this comment
- WHAT A CROCK!
1. I FEEL YOUR PAIN DID GORE SOME GOOD.
2. HILLARY WON REPUBLICAN PRIMARY VOTERS MAINLY.
3. HILLARY WILL LOSE FOR DEMS W/REPUBLICANS AMMO AGAINST HER, HANDS DOWN. VP OR PRESIDENT.
4. A BLACK AND A WOMAN TOGETHER WOULD BE TOO MUCH CULTURE SHOCK. FROM CIVIL RIGHTS HISTORY, THE BLACKS LEAD FIRST, AND THEN THE WOMEN (BUT HILLARY IS IN NO WAY MATURE ENOUGH TO BE PRESIDENT).
5. OBAMA IS DOING FINE. REPUBLICANS MUST BE BACKING CBS MEDIA. AND CBS MEDIA IS HYPING HILLARY, LIKE THE REPUBLICANS (AND CHENEY PUBLICALLY DID FROM DAY 1!).
6. OBAMA NEEDS SOMEONE WITH MILITARY BACKGROUND TO BALANCE OUT THE TICKET.
OBAMA IS THE NEXT PRESIDENT, DUH! - Reply to this comment
- WHAT A CROCK!
1. I FEEL YOUR PAIN DID GORE SOME GOOD.
2. HILLARY WON REPUBLICAN PRIMARY VOTERS MAINLY.
3. HILLARY WILL LOSE FOR DEMS W/REPUBLICANS AMMO AGAINST HER, HANDS DOWN. VP OR PRESIDENT.
4. A BLACK AND A WOMAN TOGETHER WOULD BE TOO MUCH CULTURE SHOCK. FROM CIVIL RIGHTS HISTORY, THE BLACKS LEAD FIRST, AND THEN THE WOMEN (BUT HILLARY IS IN NO WAY MATURE ENOUGH TO BE PRESIDENT).
5. OBAMA IS DOING FINE. REPUBLICANS MUST BE BACKING CBS MEDIA. AND CBS MEDIA IS HYPING HILLARY, LIKE THE REPUBLICANS (AND CHENEY PUBLICALLY DID FROM DAY 1!).
6. OBAMA NEEDS SOMEONE WITH MILITARY BACKGROUND TO BALANCE OUT THE TICKET.
OBAMA IS THE NEXT PRESIDENT, DUH! - Reply to this comment
- WHAT A CROCK!
1. I FEEL YOUR PAIN DID GORE SOME GOOD.
2. HILLARY WON REPUBLICAN PRIMARY VOTERS MAINLY.
3. HILLARY WILL LOSE FOR DEMS W/REPUBLICANS AMMO AGAINST HER, HANDS DOWN. VP OR PRESIDENT.
4. A BLACK AND A WOMAN TOGETHER WOULD BE TOO MUCH CULTURE SHOCK. FROM CIVIL RIGHTS HISTORY, THE BLACKS LEAD FIRST, AND THEN THE WOMEN (BUT HILLARY IS IN NO WAY MATURE ENOUGH TO BE PRESIDENT).
5. OBAMA IS DOING FINE. REPUBLICANS MUST BE BACKING CBS MEDIA. AND CBS MEDIA IS HYPING HILLARY, LIKE THE REPUBLICANS (AND CHENEY PUBLICALLY DID FROM DAY 1!).
6. OBAMA NEEDS SOMEONE WITH MILITARY BACKGROUND TO BALANCE OUT THE TICKET.
OBAMA IS THE NEXT PRESIDENT, DUH! - Reply to this comment
- Posted by brianbwb at 11:56 AM : Jun 13, 2008
wrongggggggggggggg shill for inbred retarded radical fascist nazi terrorislamic jihadists muslim slavers, murderers and rapists
after america became a country,,, fascist nazi terrorislam demanded that america pay protection money or they would attack americas ships and enslave all on board,,,
thomas jefferson and james madison was having non of that,,, and they sent americas military to kick fascist nazi terrorislams arses in barbary war one and barbary war two,,, why two wars,,, fascist nazi terrorislamists break treaties,,, sound familiar??? can you say iraq,,,
It is a settled policy of America, that as peace is better than war, war is better than tribute. The United States, while they wish for war with no nation, will buy peace with none. President James Madison - Reply to this comment
- Magda61,
Clinton didn''t salvage the economy with pinache, he salvaged it with sensible policy.
The same policies are needed now. We need to practice fiscal discipline by paying for programs as we go. Lowering the deficit will decrease the government footprint in the capital markets and help business and consumers.
We need to adopt tax policies which share the burden fairly and expect that those who benefit the most from society(the wealthy)are not given breaks which the rest of us have to pay for. We need to help those struggling to make ends meet by not adding to their burden.
We need to make wise investments to create jobs where they''re needed. 2/3 of all job growth since 2001 has been in health care and education. As the populations of retirees needing healthcare and school age children needing educational opportunities grows, it doesn''t take a rocket scientist to recognize where te investments need to be made to get America working again in jobs that can''t be outsourced. Republicans are not rocket scientists.
The Democrats support the policies which gave us peace and prosperity in the 1990s and those same policies will bring us back in the next decade. - Reply to this comment
- "it is time to consider how much more it will cost if we do not defeat fascist nazi terrorislam,,," Posted by terrorislami
A lot less than the current fake ghost chasing. Your genocide program has failed, all that remains is to bring the troops home, and start the war crimes trials. - Reply to this comment
- If Obama is so concerned about us then how come he is not proposing a national conversion of our auto''s to run off of natural/propane/methane gas which when converted from BTU''s to gallons equals .83 a gallon compared to $4+ a gallon of gasoline.
- Reply to this comment
- Posted by taddles3 at 11:17 AM : Jun 13, 2008
Posted by rharrin1 at 11:01 AM : Jun 13, 2008
PATTON
General Bradley:
Have you seen the casualty lists?
Patton:
Yes, I''ve seen them.
General Bradley. . .
. . .it''s time to consider how many
casualties we''d have. . .
. . .if we were still crawling on
that ******* road.
it is time to consider how much more it will cost if we do not defeat fascist nazi terrorislam,,, - Reply to this comment
- Why do Ron Paul say that Obama is for Status quo? BTW, I see a lot obama endorsements reported in the news, I don''t see speeches like this in the news much. I don''t trust change without substance. I take Bush''s Iraq war as a change from eight years of excessive loan caused false prosperity. I learned to go against what media is selling. In this case, it is Obama.
http://youtube.com/watch?v=ez5robAWmu4 - Reply to this comment
- "Scalia asserted that the decision will have dire consequences. He warned that some detainees will be freed and return to war against America: "The nation will live to regret what the court has done today."
Posted by terrorislami at 10:46 AM : Jun 13, 2008"
Sounds awfully "activist" of Scalia, the "strict constructionist" and "Constitutional originalist".
Scalia''s argument is self indicting, he claims that we can''t allow them the right of habeas corpus because then they might be able to show that they in fact were wrongly detained. If they are in fact terrorists and there is any shred of evidence to that fact they will remain incarcerated. If they were wrongly incarcerated and illegally detained then they should be released. Claiming that we can''t allow them access to a court or allow them habeas because they might be released and might retaliate is facetious and is not becoming a Supreme Court Justice. That kind of criminal false logic should be grounds for Impeachment and removal from office. - Reply to this comment
- With white voters in Indiana - a state he might try to contest this fall - the relationship between pocketbook assessments and Obama''s support was large. While he won a majority of those (few) saying the recession hadn%u2019t hit home for them, he took only about a third of those deeply affected.
Red state Indiana voted for Bush twice and now they are looking for someone to save them. Too funny! - Reply to this comment
- Barack Obama could morph into John Maynard Keynes and I still wouldn''''t vote for him.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by creeper00 at 10:22 AM : Jun 13, 2008
So, you''re voting your hissy fit and not the best interests of your country. You don''t care how much damage is done to this country as long as you can feel self-righteous. That, I believe, is pretty much the definition of "un-American". - Reply to this comment
- THE NATION WILL LIVE TO REGRET WHAT THE COURT HAS DONE TODAY,,,
VOTE DEMONIC-RAT AT YOUR PERIL,,,
DEMONIC-RAT UN-SUPREME COURT JUDGES TRASH THE CONSTITUTION,,,
Scalia asserted that the decision will have dire consequences. He warned that some detainees will be freed and return to war against America: "The nation will live to regret what the court has done today."
Supreme Court maintains post-9/11 course on Gitmo
The Supreme Court''''s 5-4 decision Thursday declaring for the first time that Guantanamo detainees have a constitutional right to a hearing in U.S. courts is a milestone. It also reinforces a familiar court pattern in the post-9/11 world of insisting on judicial review of detainee cases.
http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/judicial/2008-06-12-court-pattern_N.htm
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/06/12/supremecourt/main4175226.shtml - Reply to this comment
Mike Huckabee on GOP "rock stars," 2012, health care reform and more.
