Comments on: Schieffer: What American Voters Want
Why Candidates Have Succeeded Or Failed Tells Us About Ourselves
- cuz "GW" didn''''t have the b@llz to do something. just shutup crybabies.
Posted by skybarr
He proved that he didn''t have any ballz with his non-existent war record during Viet Nam you MORON!!!!! I served so don''t tell me to shutup. I earned the frickin'' right to ***!! - Reply to this comment
- I want to see a completely newly elected gov''t. NO INCUMBENTS, vote all the b astards OUT!!!
- Reply to this comment
- McCain is principled? Like when he ripped off the taxpayer $100 billions of dollars in his Keating 5 role to cover up for S&L crooks. Or was McCain principled when he cheated on his injured first wife? Give me a break--McCain is nothing more than a common street thug.
- Reply to this comment
- "If GW didn''''t respond to 911 then you cry babies would be mad cuz "GW" didn''''t have the b@llz to do something. just shutup crybabies." Posted by skybarr
Bush had the country and the world behind him when he went in to Afghanistan - it was everything that came after that that proved him a disaster. - Reply to this comment
- Sorry Roger but you have just demonstrated you do not know what the hell you are talking about. McCain is one of the most principled people that has ever served this country. That is a fact not open to dispute. I suupose one could argue the sky is green but we all know better than that.
- Reply to this comment
- Schieffer and his media buddies have a never-ending thing for McCain. These are people in the media who are supposed to be critical thinkers. McCain "Principaled?" Give me a break. Only principaled until he wants to be President. What a hypocrit, and Schieffer his ardent promoter. Time for the media to take their jobs seriously. The Bush-break is over; time to get back to work.
- Reply to this comment
- skybarr, it was the justice department that responded so quickly because bush was in hiding because he was afraid of getting killed by them thar "turrorists fella''s" and that is a direct quote. There are still millions of unanswered questions about 9/11 that we, THE PEOPLE, want answers. bush did not see RED, WHITE, and BLUE when the Twin Towers fell, he saw about mile wide YELLOW streak down his back.
- Reply to this comment
- And if GW is such a bumbling idiot then why did the American people vote him in a second time? If GW didn''t respond to 911 then you cry babies would be mad cuz "GW" didn''t have the b@llz to do something. just shutup crybabies.
- Reply to this comment
- Yes, Binky, it is true that many people have been fooled by Huckabee. He is not the good guy that he projectys, nor is a bad guy. He is just another Bush. Opinionated, head strong, and secretive to the extreme. If McCain wins and selects him as VP he will be sorry. Huckabee will hog all of the glory, if there is any.
- Reply to this comment
- I have had this eerie feeling during the past year of watching the presidential campaigning, that I have been actually watching the movie "Being There". I hear "Change! Change! Change!" I hear about "getting past partisanship", "bringing people together". Yet, the only REAL in depth information as to HOW change and bipartisanship will come about seems to be coming not from the candidates, but from pundits and people on the street.
Here''s the scenario:
Reporter: Senator Chauncey Gardener! How will you bring about change in the White House and what does that really mean?"
A: Ahh. Change, like the seasons is good.
Reporter: OK, folks. You heard it directly from the cadidate''s own mouth! Senator Gardener, like the change from a cold barren winter landscape, will create what we Americans really want! A glorious spring- like growth of prosperity and good will amongst the decision- makers in Washington D.C.! I can speak for this reporter when I say, Senator Gardener has cleared the path for my vote!!"
Sheesh!
DanO
PS- Go rent the movie. It exposes a lot of what we see... or want to see. - Reply to this comment




