14 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
gep1955 says:
So many delicate, sensitive and tender people in the world, they offend me!
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Rick03466 says:
Shame on the people of Australia for allowing the government to be so oppressive.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
1notrub11 says:
This is just out of control.

No one is forcing anyone to view the social media pages of these athletes. And Empire's comment regarding the biathalon is well taken. Let me guess - the biatheletes will not be allowed to pose privately with the weapon they use either?
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
rightofwrong says:
Why is this news?
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
tomanyt says:
Am I missing something here? They had their picture taken while holding a weapon and they (Swimming Australia) consider the photos "inappropriate"? How exactly are they inappropriate?
reply
pbaird2 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Ordinarily this would not be an issue, but because of the similarities to horrendous incidents this picture is insensitive to many. Monk was holding the same pump-action shot guns used by Martin Bryant, who murdered 35 people in Port Arthur in 1996. D'Arcy was pictured holding semi-automatic pistols, similar to those used by Virginia Tech gunman Cho Seung-Hui.
KnowerseekerReturns replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
pbaird2, thanks for supplying that important piece of information. Shame on you, cbsnews!
pwgrant replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
pbaird2: That's the best reason these are inappropriate?! That's the DUMBEST reason I can imagine!! Insensitive?! That's even worse. So because a police officer was struck and killed by someone using the same make and model as my car any photo of me with my car is to be considered inappropriate? It's gun-control-wackoism, plain and simple!
linkicon reporticon emailicon
AOCGUY says:
Are guns illegal in Australia? Any Aussie's on here care to comment?
reply
KnowerseekerReturns replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Not an Aussie, but I was thinking the same thing.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
AOCGUY says:
How is posing in a legal store with a legal product and posting the pic on your personal page inappropriate? A gun is an inanimate object.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
nojoy01 says:
Swimming Australia issued a statement saying it became aware of "inappropriate photos" and "instantly contacted the athletes involved to ask for them to be removed."
-----------------------------------------------------------------

It is said that "Beauty is in the eye of the beholder". One of the corollaries is also true. "Innappropriate photos" are also in the eye of the beholder. Different country, different mores, different perceptions.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
jt92202 says:
They didn't bring the guns to Australia nor does it sound like they bought a gun just posed with them!! Nothing illegal about it in the US so what's the probem! OH that's right since they are on the Olympic Team they are ROLE MODELS so they shouldn't be human and just be robots that only think of the children!! Give me a break, they are young men with talent, they signed up to be swimmers not Role Models!!!
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
jsutaguy says:
Well, looks like George Orwell had the right idea in 1984, but perhaps the wrong country. Australia implements "Thoughtcrime" punishment. Sanctioning people because they took a (non obscene) photo.

This is absurd.
reply
Scroll Left Scroll Right