Comments on: Boehner: I'll Drop Tax Cut for Rich If I Have To
Add a Comment
- A income of $250,00 dollars a year is a lot of money! I am not going to say these individuals are rich, but we are talking about a after tax income of around $190,000 a year which is almost $16,000 a month income.
Now, if you living a house that was $500,000 dollars or more, got to go out and buy the new BMW 7 series at about $100,000 dollars along with trying to keep up with the "Joneses" then I can see how some might complain.
I make six-figures as well and although I am not yet up to those figures yet, but if I was I would honestly keep my mouth shut. - Reply to this comment
- Boehner...thanks for setting $250k as rich...you fool.
- Reply to this comment
- Glenn Beck defining progressive as though it is a negative entity as he does with the word socialism. Continues to retard to past examples without expressing how to benefit from the observations of past agendas and how to apply them in the present for beneficial opportunities.
Socialism, I fail to comprehend his problem other than his abilities to properly define it as he fails with the terminology of progression. Society by its existence prescribes to socialism as their means of interrelating. All societies incorporate socialism! Road ways, Police, Military, Fire Dept, and so on and so on.
His idea of progression? What $700 billion more to the Elitist with your socialism taxes?
The man is a walking contradiction!
Now Rove.. A Busch remnant of financial failure is now one of FOX?s elite! This people follow as their source of wisdom?
Article exemplifies historical passages of how particular scenarios where addressed and acted upon for what they considered as the most efficient means of evolving this government. Making and correcting errors as they progressed. Just as of today. To learn from this and apply what we have learned from history is only logical if it is for a progressive evolution. To infer that what we must retard back to agendas that were not efficient to the continuation of the societies evolution is illogical. World and exterior entities have come and gone. Consideration as to their effects on our society is demanded of those in the present to ascertain future development of society. Its relation and means to compete with foreign competition is to take in the state of all forces that are in interrelation. Consider the demise of Monarchies from 1789 [French Revolution] through to WW1. WW2 the solidification of the demise of Monarchies. Empires, and ideologies of illiberal structures, presented with their demise as forthcoming. Note fall of Berlin wall as the acceptance of communist that their system failed. They are now seeking to encapsulate the liberalism of international free trade which promotes democratic scenarios and agendas. World of today has and is evolving to a point of unification through the processes of liberalized markets. War becomes unprofitable! Education, health and financial stability will be the determining factors as to the positions the various competitors will acquire to hold power. Thus; this is not the time to retard to a small government or laggard positions.
Advancement, forward progression is the moral imperative for the future, if we are to have a say in it. - Reply to this comment
- Does this remind you of anything from the past. Reagan?s economics. The first president to send us into over a $ trillion deficit and it has been growing ever since. Trickle down economics has been proven wrong. By the time Busch steps into office we have $ 5.7 trillion deficit following this Reagan economics. Busch gives it it another shot for it to work and leaves office with $ 12.4 trillion deficit? Last 2 years elitist have had $ 180 billion to produce employment. Never happened did it. Now Bone head wants to try it for 10 more years at $700 billion? He says Obama is spending? WOW! Just what is it the FOX urchins, been mixing in your TEA? I realize that republicans and TEABAGGERS want to destroy our education even further than it is but now to pay for all of this they want to destroy your S.S., Medicare and Health.
Only education you are getting now comes from FOX urchins. Stupid is as Stupid does. Looking about me I truly see that definition manifesting itself in this TEA flavored republican mentality and those that support it. - Reply to this comment
- There is almost too much irony in the idea of reducing taxes for the rich so they can build more factories in China, but it does have a ring in it, unfortunately. It certainly evoked a slight smile of recognition, and an element of truth is necessary for humour. Great comment
- Reply to this comment
- Bonehead, that is a no-brainer.
Whoops sorry to nail you with the fact you are a bonehead AND a no-brainer.
Tax cuts cause wages to go down for the middle class and income for the filthy rich to go up.
Now that was the Mission Accomplished Bushoccio meant. - Reply to this comment
- Just as important as keeping religion out of government is to separate corporations from government. Otherwise you get right wing fascism as we have in America now. And then you get criminals like George Bushoccio who were both religious and corporatist. And you get a current disaster that we have now.
- Reply to this comment
- George, believe what you want to believe, just don't ask anyone else to.
I myself believe a Flying Spaghetti Monster created the earth because there is no proof He didn't. Plus I love spaghetti. rAmen. - Reply to this comment
- Bushoccio said that he wanted everyone to own a home WHETHER THEY HAD THE MONEY OR NOT.
Of course that is why he bailed out the banksters after his program became a complete disaster.
You cannot get more twisted, more corrupt, or more of a failure than Bushoccio and his GOP crime family. - Reply to this comment
- The bottom line is that the tax cuts for the rich sunk us. We LOST jobs as a result.
In a time of war, the Bushoccio Crime Family is giving tax CUTS to the same people that were war profiteering. This is what caused the Depression, the second Republican Depression of the last 100 years. - Reply to this comment
