Comments on: Giuliani: Palin More Qualified Than Obama
Says As Mayor Of Small Alaska Town Palin Has Had To Make Decisions Rather Than Speeches
- ROE VS WADE SHOULD BE A BIG DEAL FOR WOMEN WHO ARE PRO CHOICE. WHEN IN COLLEGE, I DID SOME RESEARCH ON LEGAL ABORTIONS VS ILLEGAL ABORTIONS THAT THE U.S. HAD ONCE A LOG TIME AGO. REALISTICALLY WOMEN STILL REACHED OUT AND FOUND BLACK MARKET DOCTORS THAT PERFORMED ILLEGAL ABORTIONS. SOME OF THESE WOMEN THAT HAD ILLEGAL ABORTIONS BLEED TO DEATH WHICH CAUSED THE DEATH OF THE MOTHER AND THE UNBORN CHILD. I BELIEVE IN ABORTION EARLY IN HER PREGNACY. ITS A FACT THAT IF A WOMAN DOES NOT WANT A CHILD SHE WILL ABORT IT ONE WAY OR ANOTHER WHICH RISKS HER LIFE. I HEARD OF WOMEN USING A CLOTH HANGER TO ABORT HER CHILD. THERE IS RAPE WHERE A WOMAN HAD NO CHOICE ABOUT HER PREGNACY. PREGNACY WHERE A CHILD IS NOT WANTED OR WAS DAMAGED WHILE IN ITS MOTHER BY EX-RAYS; A FALL; OR ABUSE BY HER MALE PARTNER. SOME TYPE OF CHILD HOOD DISABILITIES WHICH THE FAMILY CAN NOT AFFORD TO CARE FOR THEIR DISABLED CHILD, MAY HAVE TO BE ABORTED BY THE INABILITY OF THE FAMILY TO CARE FOR THE DISABLED CHILD PROPERLY. OVER TURNING ROE VS WADE WOULD PUT US BACK INTO A RISKER TIME FOR PREGNANT WOMEN. WHERE THEY WOULD LOOSE THEIR RIGHTS CONCERNING THEIR BODY AND PERSONAL WILL!
- Reply to this comment
- SO ACTUALLY WE HAVE LESS THEN TWO YEARS OF BEING A GOVENOR.ROE VS WADE SHOULD BE A BIG DEAL FOR WOMEN WHO ARE PRO CHOICE. WHEN IN COLLEGE, I DID SOME RESEARCH ON LEGAL ABORTIONS VS ILLEGAL ABORTIONS THAT THE U.S. HAD ONCE A LOG TIME AGO. REALISTICALLY WOMEN STILL REACHED OUT AND FOUND BLACK MARKET DOCTORS THAT PERFORMED ILLEGAL ABORTIONS. SOME OF THESE WOMEN THAT HAD ILLEGAL ABORTIONS BLEED TO DEATH WHICH CAUSED THE DEATH OF THE MOTHER AND THE UNBORN CHILD. I BELIEVE IN ABORTION EARLY IN HER PREGNACY. ITS A FACT THAT IF A WOMAN DOES NOT WANT A CHILD SHE WILL ABORT IT ONE WAY OR ANOTHER WHICH RISKS HER LIFE. I HEARD OF WOMEN USING A CLOTH HANGER TO ABORT HER CHILD. THERE IS RAPE WHERE A WOMAN HAD NO CHOICE ABOUT HER PREGNACY. PREGNACY WHERE A CHILD IS NOT WANTED OR WAS DAMAGED WHILE IN ITS MOTHER BY EX-RAYS; A FALL; OR ABUSE BY HER MALE PARTNER. SOME TYPE OF CHILD HOOD DISABILITIES WHICH THE FAMILY CAN NOT AFFORD TO CARE FOR THEIR DISABLED CHILD, MAY HAVE TO BE ABORTED BY THE INABILITY OF THE FAMILY TO CARE FOR THE DISABLED CHILD PROPERLY. OVER TURNING ROE VS WADE WOULD PUT US BACK INTO A RISKER TIME FOR PREGNANT WOMEN. WHERE THEY WOULD LOOSE THEIR RIGHTS CONCERNING THEIR BODY AND PERSONAL WILL!
- Reply to this comment
- I WAS REQUIRED TO DO PAYROLL AND PAY PAYROLL TAXES TO OVER SEE A.P. AND A.R. THAT IS NOT THE EXPERIENCE NEEDED TO BE PRESIDENT. SO ACTUALLY WE HAVE LESS THEN TWO YEARS OF BEING A GOVENOR.ROE VS WADE SHOULD BE A BIG DEAL FOR WOMEN WHO ARE PRO CHOICE. WHEN IN COLLEGE, I DID SOME RESEARCH ON LEGAL ABORTIONS VS ILLEGAL ABORTIONS THAT THE U.S. HAD ONCE A LOG TIME AGO. REALISTICALLY WOMEN STILL REACHED OUT AND FOUND BLACK MARKET DOCTORS THAT PERFORMED ILLEGAL ABORTIONS. SOME OF THESE WOMEN THAT HAD ILLEGAL ABORTIONS BLEED TO DEATH WHICH CAUSED THE DEATH OF THE MOTHER AND THE UNBORN CHILD. I BELIEVE IN ABORTION EARLY IN HER PREGNACY. ITS A FACT THAT IF A WOMAN DOES NOT WANT A CHILD SHE WILL ABORT IT ONE WAY OR ANOTHER WHICH RISKS HER LIFE. I HEARD OF WOMEN USING A CLOTH HANGER TO ABORT HER CHILD. THERE IS RAPE WHERE A WOMAN HAD NO CHOICE ABOUT HER PREGNACY. PREGNACY WHERE A CHILD IS NOT WANTED OR WAS DAMAGED WHILE IN ITS MOTHER BY EX-RAYS; A FALL; OR ABUSE BY HER MALE PARTNER. SOME TYPE OF CHILD HOOD DISABILITIES WHICH THE FAMILY CAN NOT AFFORD TO CARE FOR THEIR DISABLED CHILD, MAY HAVE TO BE ABORTED BY THE INABILITY OF THE FAMILY TO CARE FOR THE DISABLED CHILD PROPERLY. OVER TURNING ROE VS WADE WOULD PUT US BACK INTO A RISKER TIME FOR PREGNANT WOMEN. WHERE THEY WOULD LOOSE THEIR RIGHTS CONCERNING THEIR BODY AND PERSONAL WILL!
- Reply to this comment
- I WAS REQUIRED TO DO PAYROLL AND PAY PAYROLL TAXES TO OVER SEE A.P. AND A.R. THAT IS NOT THE EXPERIENCE NEEDED TO BE PRESIDENT. SO ACTUALLY WE HAVE LESS THEN TWO YEARS OF BEING A GOVENOR.ROE VS WADE SHOULD BE A BIG DEAL FOR WOMEN WHO ARE PRO CHOICE. WHEN IN COLLEGE, I DID SOME RESEARCH ON LEGAL ABORTIONS VS ILLEGAL ABORTIONS THAT THE U.S. HAD ONCE A LOG TIME AGO. REALISTICALLY WOMEN STILL REACHED OUT AND FOUND BLACK MARKET DOCTORS THAT PERFORMED ILLEGAL ABORTIONS. SOME OF THESE WOMEN THAT HAD ILLEGAL ABORTIONS BLEED TO DEATH WHICH CAUSED THE DEATH OF THE MOTHER AND THE UNBORN CHILD. I BELIEVE IN ABORTION EARLY IN HER PREGNACY. ITS A FACT THAT IF A WOMAN DOES NOT WANT A CHILD SHE WILL ABORT IT ONE WAY OR ANOTHER WHICH RISKS HER LIFE. I HEARD OF WOMEN USING A CLOTH HANGER TO ABORT HER CHILD. THERE IS RAPE WHERE A WOMAN HAD NO CHOICE ABOUT HER PREGNACY. PREGNACY WHERE A CHILD IS NOT WANTED OR WAS DAMAGED WHILE IN ITS MOTHER BY EX-RAYS; A FALL; OR ABUSE BY HER MALE PARTNER. SOME TYPE OF CHILD HOOD DISABILITIES WHICH THE FAMILY CAN NOT AFFORD TO CARE FOR THEIR DISABLED CHILD, MAY HAVE TO BE ABORTED BY THE INABILITY OF THE FAMILY TO CARE FOR THE DISABLED CHILD PROPERLY. OVER TURNING ROE VS WADE WOULD PUT US BACK INTO A RISKER TIME FOR PREGNANT WOMEN. WHERE THEY WOULD LOOSE THEIR RIGHTS CONCERNING THEIR BODY AND PERSONAL WILL!
- Reply to this comment
- I WAS REQUIRED TO DO PAYROLL AND PAY PAYROLL TAXES TO OVER SEE A.P. AND A.R. THAT IS NOT THE EXPERIENCE NEEDED TO BE PRESIDENT. SO ACTUALLY WE HAVE LESS THEN TWO YEARS OF BEING A GOVENOR.ROE VS WADE SHOULD BE A BIG DEAL FOR WOMEN WHO ARE PRO CHOICE. WHEN IN COLLEGE, I DID SOME RESEARCH ON LEGAL ABORTIONS VS ILLEGAL ABORTIONS THAT THE U.S. HAD ONCE A LOG TIME AGO. REALISTICALLY WOMEN STILL REACHED OUT AND FOUND BLACK MARKET DOCTORS THAT PERFORMED ILLEGAL ABORTIONS. SOME OF THESE WOMEN THAT HAD ILLEGAL ABORTIONS BLEED TO DEATH WHICH CAUSED THE DEATH OF THE MOTHER AND THE UNBORN CHILD. I BELIEVE IN ABORTION EARLY IN HER PREGNACY. ITS A FACT THAT IF A WOMAN DOES NOT WANT A CHILD SHE WILL ABORT IT ONE WAY OR ANOTHER WHICH RISKS HER LIFE. I HEARD OF WOMEN USING A CLOTH HANGER TO ABORT HER CHILD. THERE IS RAPE WHERE A WOMAN HAD NO CHOICE ABOUT HER PREGNACY. PREGNACY WHERE A CHILD IS NOT WANTED OR WAS DAMAGED WHILE IN ITS MOTHER BY EX-RAYS; A FALL; OR ABUSE BY HER MALE PARTNER. SOME TYPE OF CHILD HOOD DISABILITIES WHICH THE FAMILY CAN NOT AFFORD TO CARE FOR THEIR DISABLED CHILD, MAY HAVE TO BE ABORTED BY THE INABILITY OF THE FAMILY TO CARE FOR THE DISABLED CHILD PROPERLY. OVER TURNING ROE VS WADE WOULD PUT US BACK INTO A RISKER TIME FOR PREGNANT WOMEN. WHERE THEY WOULD LOOSE THEIR RIGHTS CONCERNING THEIR BODY AND PERSONAL WILL!
- Reply to this comment
- I WAS REQUIRED TO DO PAYROLL AND PAY PAYROLL TAXES TO OVER SEE A.P. AND A.R. THAT IS NOT THE EXPERIENCE NEEDED TO BE PRESIDENT. SO ACTUALLY WE HAVE LESS THEN TWO YEARS OF BEING A GOVENOR.ROE VS WADE SHOULD BE A BIG DEAL FOR WOMEN WHO ARE PRO CHOICE. WHEN IN COLLEGE, I DID SOME RESEARCH ON LEGAL ABORTIONS VS ILLEGAL ABORTIONS THAT THE U.S. HAD ONCE A LOG TIME AGO. REALISTICALLY WOMEN STILL REACHED OUT AND FOUND BLACK MARKET DOCTORS THAT PERFORMED ILLEGAL ABORTIONS. SOME OF THESE WOMEN THAT HAD ILLEGAL ABORTIONS BLEED TO DEATH WHICH CAUSED THE DEATH OF THE MOTHER AND THE UNBORN CHILD. I BELIEVE IN ABORTION EARLY IN HER PREGNACY. ITS A FACT THAT IF A WOMAN DOES NOT WANT A CHILD SHE WILL ABORT IT ONE WAY OR ANOTHER WHICH RISKS HER LIFE. I HEARD OF WOMEN USING A CLOTH HANGER TO ABORT HER CHILD. THERE IS RAPE WHERE A WOMAN HAD NO CHOICE ABOUT HER PREGNACY. PREGNACY WHERE A CHILD IS NOT WANTED OR WAS DAMAGED WHILE IN ITS MOTHER BY EX-RAYS; A FALL; OR ABUSE BY HER MALE PARTNER. SOME TYPE OF CHILD HOOD DISABILITIES WHICH THE FAMILY CAN NOT AFFORD TO CARE FOR THEIR DISABLED CHILD, MAY HAVE TO BE ABORTED BY THE INABILITY OF THE FAMILY TO CARE FOR THE DISABLED CHILD PROPERLY. OVER TURNING ROE VS WADE WOULD PUT US BACK INTO A RISKER TIME FOR PREGNANT WOMEN. WHERE THEY WOULD LOOSE THEIR RIGHTS CONCERNING THEIR BODY AND PERSONAL WILL!
- Reply to this comment
- I WAS REQUIRED TO DO PAYROLL AND PAY PAYROLL TAXES TO OVER SEE A.P. AND A.R. THAT IS NOT THE EXPERIENCE NEEDED TO BE PRESIDENT. SO ACTUALLY WE HAVE LESS THEN TWO YEARS OF BEING A GOVENOR.ROE VS WADE SHOULD BE A BIG DEAL FOR WOMEN WHO ARE PRO CHOICE. WHEN IN COLLEGE, I DID SOME RESEARCH ON LEGAL ABORTIONS VS ILLEGAL ABORTIONS THAT THE U.S. HAD ONCE A LOG TIME AGO. REALISTICALLY WOMEN STILL REACHED OUT AND FOUND BLACK MARKET DOCTORS THAT PERFORMED ILLEGAL ABORTIONS. SOME OF THESE WOMEN THAT HAD ILLEGAL ABORTIONS BLEED TO DEATH WHICH CAUSED THE DEATH OF THE MOTHER AND THE UNBORN CHILD. I BELIEVE IN ABORTION EARLY IN HER PREGNACY. ITS A FACT THAT IF A WOMAN DOES NOT WANT A CHILD SHE WILL ABORT IT ONE WAY OR ANOTHER WHICH RISKS HER LIFE. I HEARD OF WOMEN USING A CLOTH HANGER TO ABORT HER CHILD. THERE IS RAPE WHERE A WOMAN HAD NO CHOICE ABOUT HER PREGNACY. PREGNACY WHERE A CHILD IS NOT WANTED OR WAS DAMAGED WHILE IN ITS MOTHER BY EX-RAYS; A FALL; OR ABUSE BY HER MALE PARTNER. SOME TYPE OF CHILD HOOD DISABILITIES WHICH THE FAMILY CAN NOT AFFORD TO CARE FOR THEIR DISABLED CHILD, MAY HAVE TO BE ABORTED BY THE INABILITY OF THE FAMILY TO CARE FOR THE DISABLED CHILD PROPERLY. OVER TURNING ROE VS WADE WOULD PUT US BACK INTO A RISKER TIME FOR PREGNANT WOMEN. WHERE THEY WOULD LOOSE THEIR RIGHTS CONCERNING THEIR BODY AND PERSONAL WILL!
- Reply to this comment
- I WAS REQUIRED TO DO PAYROLL AND PAY PAYROLL TAXES TO OVER SEE A.P. AND A.R. THAT IS NOT THE EXPERIENCE NEEDED TO BE PRESIDENT. SO ACTUALLY WE HAVE LESS THEN TWO YEARS OF BEING A GOVENOR.ROE VS WADE SHOULD BE A BIG DEAL FOR WOMEN WHO ARE PRO CHOICE. WHEN IN COLLEGE, I DID SOME RESEARCH ON LEGAL ABORTIONS VS ILLEGAL ABORTIONS THAT THE U.S. HAD ONCE A LOG TIME AGO. REALISTICALLY WOMEN STILL REACHED OUT AND FOUND BLACK MARKET DOCTORS THAT PERFORMED ILLEGAL ABORTIONS. SOME OF THESE WOMEN THAT HAD ILLEGAL ABORTIONS BLEED TO DEATH WHICH CAUSED THE DEATH OF THE MOTHER AND THE UNBORN CHILD. I BELIEVE IN ABORTION EARLY IN HER PREGNACY. ITS A FACT THAT IF A WOMAN DOES NOT WANT A CHILD SHE WILL ABORT IT ONE WAY OR ANOTHER WHICH RISKS HER LIFE. I HEARD OF WOMEN USING A CLOTH HANGER TO ABORT HER CHILD. THERE IS RAPE WHERE A WOMAN HAD NO CHOICE ABOUT HER PREGNACY. PREGNACY WHERE A CHILD IS NOT WANTED OR WAS DAMAGED WHILE IN ITS MOTHER BY EX-RAYS; A FALL; OR ABUSE BY HER MALE PARTNER. SOME TYPE OF CHILD HOOD DISABILITIES WHICH THE FAMILY CAN NOT AFFORD TO CARE FOR THEIR DISABLED CHILD, MAY HAVE TO BE ABORTED BY THE INABILITY OF THE FAMILY TO CARE FOR THE DISABLED CHILD PROPERLY. OVER TURNING ROE VS WADE WOULD PUT US BACK INTO A RISKER TIME FOR PREGNANT WOMEN. WHERE THEY WOULD LOOSE THEIR RIGHTS CONCERNING THEIR BODY AND PERSONAL WILL!
- Reply to this comment
- I WAS REQUIRED TO DO PAYROLL AND PAY PAYROLL TAXES TO OVER SEE A.P. AND A.R. THAT IS NOT THE EXPERIENCE NEEDED TO BE PRESIDENT. SO ACTUALLY WE HAVE LESS THEN TWO YEARS OF BEING A GOVENOR.ROE VS WADE SHOULD BE A BIG DEAL FOR WOMEN WHO ARE PRO CHOICE. WHEN IN COLLEGE, I DID SOME RESEARCH ON LEGAL ABORTIONS VS ILLEGAL ABORTIONS THAT THE U.S. HAD ONCE A LOG TIME AGO. REALISTICALLY WOMEN STILL REACHED OUT AND FOUND BLACK MARKET DOCTORS THAT PERFORMED ILLEGAL ABORTIONS. SOME OF THESE WOMEN THAT HAD ILLEGAL ABORTIONS BLEED TO DEATH WHICH CAUSED THE DEATH OF THE MOTHER AND THE UNBORN CHILD. I BELIEVE IN ABORTION EARLY IN HER PREGNACY. ITS A FACT THAT IF A WOMAN DOES NOT WANT A CHILD SHE WILL ABORT IT ONE WAY OR ANOTHER WHICH RISKS HER LIFE. I HEARD OF WOMEN USING A CLOTH HANGER TO ABORT HER CHILD. THERE IS RAPE WHERE A WOMAN HAD NO CHOICE ABOUT HER PREGNACY. PREGNACY WHERE A CHILD IS NOT WANTED OR WAS DAMAGED WHILE IN ITS MOTHER BY EX-RAYS; A FALL; OR ABUSE BY HER MALE PARTNER. SOME TYPE OF CHILD HOOD DISABILITIES WHICH THE FAMILY CAN NOT AFFORD TO CARE FOR THEIR DISABLED CHILD, MAY HAVE TO BE ABORTED BY THE INABILITY OF THE FAMILY TO CARE FOR THE DISABLED CHILD PROPERLY. OVER TURNING ROE VS WADE WOULD PUT US BACK INTO A RISKER TIME FOR PREGNANT WOMEN. WHERE THEY WOULD LOOSE THEIR RIGHTS CONCERNING THEIR BODY AND PERSONAL WILL!
- Reply to this comment
- rudy baby what are you qualified for ? a series of two word answers, Bernie kerick ,mafia connections , cross dressing, multiple marriages, unfaithful liasons, unprepared 9/11, personal profit,public malfeasance,final answer , not much ..
- Reply to this comment
Grammy winner Shakira on her music career, philanthropy and being sexy..




