Comments on: Richardson: Voters Decide, Not Big Shots

Says Party Superdelegates Should Not Overrule Popular Will Of Voters In Choosing Nominee

[pepperwood2]

Rendell (former DNC president & fund raiser for Bill ) is sure his Old Guard Rednecks will see to it that Obama will be put back in his place in Pa.

Go Hillary - Our Great White Hope.

[jesterbelle]

Obama''s writing another book.It''s title is "The Audacity of Hillary".

[rowdytexan2]

Posted by DGUffelman at 12:49 PM : Mar 31, 2008

You''re absolutely right! And those people asking for Hllary Clinton to step down just want an easy win for Obama instead of making him earn it!

Gov. Richardson was a fool to make a backroom bargain with Obama for the VP slot, before a nomination was made! It was the height of bad judgment. Obama has since dropped him like a hot potatoe after getting his endorsement and is now woeing Bloomberg for the VP slot! Poetic justice, what?

Sorry I feel no shame for any of my statements against a corrupt shill trying to get an easy win out of this nomination.

[rowdytexan2]

Posted by ssskfrancis at 11:06 AM : Mar 31, 2008

Well said!

[rowdytexan2]

Posted by bobnjersey at 08:14 AM : Mar 31, 2008

8,700 people being taught anti-American separatism by Rev. Wright plus another few million who read Obama''s books that honor and speak to Rev. WRight''s teachings.

LOTS of ''em!

[dguffelman]

I think Gov. Richardson''s endorsement of Obama was a courageous act and reflects his honest views of which candidate is best for the country. It is to his credit that he values his honest opinion as more important than which candidate has tossed him the most political favors.

Richardson has acted with class, dignity and courage. Isn%u2019t it disloyalty for Carville, owing so much to the Dems, to disparage a top Democrat? How can that possibly help the Dems win, whoever the eventual nominee turns out to be?

It%u2019s revealing that some view loyalty as owed in proportion to political favors previously given. That is old-style, corrupt politics. "Who-owes-whom-what?" How about some new-style politics where we focus on what''s best for America, not what''s best for the Clintons or the party bosses? Quite frankly, we shouldn''t be focusing on what best for any particular interest group or demographic sub-group either.

No one is entitled to the Presidency. No one is entitled to a single vote. Support must be earned through character, ideas, leadership and honesty. That%u2019s why I''m an Obama supporter %u2013 it%u2019s my honest view that he%u2019s best for America in 2008.

I do not disparage anyone who has a contrary view. But shame on those who have posted venom-filled hate messages in this forum. Whoever you are, you are not helping whatever candidate you purport to endorse.

[gunownerdan]

Dirty democrats and rotten republicans will destroy America ...
IF WE LET THEM!

[ssskfrancis]

HILLARY ARE WITH YOU: Hillary, you should continue your fight against the sexists, racists and anti-American elements forces in this election. Do not listen to the Obama cronies who try to disfranchise the millions in FLORIDA AND MICHIGAN and try to steal the election from you. %u201CIF YOU DON%u2019T LEARN FROM HISTORY YOU ARE CONDEMNED TO REPEAT IT%u201D (SANTAYANA) Remember 2000 election.

[abuclaflin]

When will you post the Hayden interview?

[betty521]

Maybe you''ll see Richardson flip back over to Clinton?? I think the super delegates can change their vote at any time. Unlikely, but with Richardson, you never know.