Comments on: Richardson: Tuesday Is "D-Day" For Dems

Says Leader In Delegate Count After This Week's Primaries Should Be Considered Nominee

[libra127]

jimmyc - How can you complain about candidates "going negative" when your posts are the most NEGATIVE ones on here ? You seem only able to trash other posters or the candidates. Not impressive.

[j-whitman]

jimmyc1955,,,, If you are an Obama supporter, that''s fine I am too & I owe you an appoligy.... But from your posts you were sounding like jwind 11 & others.

[jimmyc1955]

Your a one track broken record aren''t you.

I AM A DEMOCRAT ALWAYS HAVE BEEN.

Does that help you?

Your a perfect example of what bothers me about the democratic party. We lost twice to a raving idiot. We lost twice because we nominated stiff, unlikeable, humorless, self serving people. Hillary would be the third in a row.

Obama is a change - period.

[libra127]

"She has displayed absolutely no characteristics in this campaign that lead me to believe she could manage office of the President of the United States." Posted by jimmyc1955

She has performed brilliantly in the debates, clearly showing both her superior knowledge of the issues and her superior experience. In the last debate, Obama was reduced to saying "I agree with Hillary" on many questions.

"In recent weeks she has gone heavily negative and going more negative every day." Posted by jimmyc1955

Perhaps. But Obama has been just as negative. He posted a "red phone" ad just like Hillary''s, same house, same kids, same message ("vote for me!").

"I pointed out that she has never run a campaign facing any real oppostion" Posted by jimmyc1955

She ran Bill''s campaign for Gov. of Arkansas when he won. Nonetheless, we are not considering her for the position of campaign manager. She has superb qualification to be President.

"has let her husband undermine her campaign over and over. I sometimes think Bill is deliberately undermining her."

She should not be held responsible for what her husband has done. He has been a loose cannon and has been severely reined in since his faux pas in SC. I doubt he has deliberately undermined her.

[j-whitman]

jimmyc1955,,,, Come on jimmy,,,, Don''t do a discredit to our mutual name --- You started posting political rhetoric without anything to back you up.

[jimmyc1955]

j-whitman - Son - where in the heck is your brain? Did you have it with you when you left the house tonight?

I am simply saying the Obama is a better candidate than Hillary.

What in the name of all that is Holy does that have to do with McCain?

I have had more rational political discussions with 10 year olds - at least they understand the topic they are supposed to be discussing. I keep talking about Obama and Clinton and you seem to think I am saying the republicans are better.

I am voting - in the general election mind you - for Obama. I will also vote in the Pennsylvania primary (a closed primary system mind you) for Obama.

[j-whitman]

jimmyc1955,,,,, You''ve got a keyboard, let your fingers do the walking ----- I''ve been posting facts & Bush''s record since before he ran for office.

[jimmyc1955]

j-whitman - Well I hope one shows up pretty soon - haven''t seen one yet though. All I see are folks posting unsupported emotional positions and generally tired rants against Bush.

[j-whitman]

jimmyc1955,,, Thank you for the correction --- But what facts can you provide that shows that her campaign is any more of a mess as McCain''s ????

[jimmyc1955]

j-whitman - Unrational?? Do you mean irrational?

I just wanted to be clear.

Hmmm relevant data. Hillarys campaign is a mess. How so you ask? She is on her third campaign manager in less than 3 months. She is spending like a drunken sailor (per the NY Times.) He campaign is disorganized and mismanaged (NPR, CBS, and CNN have all run articles on that fact).

If she can''t run a presidental campaign any better than that do you really want her in the White House when something bad happens??