Comments on: Richardson: Tuesday Is "D-Day" For Dems

Says Leader In Delegate Count After This Week's Primaries Should Be Considered Nominee

[libra127]

jimmyc - How can you complain about candidates "going negative" when your posts are the most NEGATIVE ones on here ? You seem only able to trash other posters or the candidates. Not impressive.

[j-whitman]

jimmyc1955,,,, If you are an Obama supporter, that''s fine I am too & I owe you an appoligy.... But from your posts you were sounding like jwind 11 & others.

[jimmyc1955]

Your a one track broken record aren''t you.

I AM A DEMOCRAT ALWAYS HAVE BEEN.

Does that help you?

Your a perfect example of what bothers me about the democratic party. We lost twice to a raving idiot. We lost twice because we nominated stiff, unlikeable, humorless, self serving people. Hillary would be the third in a row.

Obama is a change - period.

[libra127]

"She has displayed absolutely no characteristics in this campaign that lead me to believe she could manage office of the President of the United States." Posted by jimmyc1955

She has performed brilliantly in the debates, clearly showing both her superior knowledge of the issues and her superior experience. In the last debate, Obama was reduced to saying "I agree with Hillary" on many questions.

"In recent weeks she has gone heavily negative and going more negative every day." Posted by jimmyc1955

Perhaps. But Obama has been just as negative. He posted a "red phone" ad just like Hillary''s, same house, same kids, same message ("vote for me!").

"I pointed out that she has never run a campaign facing any real oppostion" Posted by jimmyc1955

She ran Bill''s campaign for Gov. of Arkansas when he won. Nonetheless, we are not considering her for the position of campaign manager. She has superb qualification to be President.

"has let her husband undermine her campaign over and over. I sometimes think Bill is deliberately undermining her."

She should not be held responsible for what her husband has done. He has been a loose cannon and has been severely reined in since his faux pas in SC. I doubt he has deliberately undermined her.

[j-whitman]

jimmyc1955,,,, Come on jimmy,,,, Don''t do a discredit to our mutual name --- You started posting political rhetoric without anything to back you up.

[jimmyc1955]

j-whitman - Son - where in the heck is your brain? Did you have it with you when you left the house tonight?

I am simply saying the Obama is a better candidate than Hillary.

What in the name of all that is Holy does that have to do with McCain?

I have had more rational political discussions with 10 year olds - at least they understand the topic they are supposed to be discussing. I keep talking about Obama and Clinton and you seem to think I am saying the republicans are better.

I am voting - in the general election mind you - for Obama. I will also vote in the Pennsylvania primary (a closed primary system mind you) for Obama.

[j-whitman]

jimmyc1955,,,,, You''ve got a keyboard, let your fingers do the walking ----- I''ve been posting facts & Bush''s record since before he ran for office.

[jimmyc1955]

j-whitman - Well I hope one shows up pretty soon - haven''t seen one yet though. All I see are folks posting unsupported emotional positions and generally tired rants against Bush.

[j-whitman]

jimmyc1955,,, Thank you for the correction --- But what facts can you provide that shows that her campaign is any more of a mess as McCain''s ????

[jimmyc1955]

j-whitman - Unrational?? Do you mean irrational?

I just wanted to be clear.

Hmmm relevant data. Hillarys campaign is a mess. How so you ask? She is on her third campaign manager in less than 3 months. She is spending like a drunken sailor (per the NY Times.) He campaign is disorganized and mismanaged (NPR, CBS, and CNN have all run articles on that fact).

If she can''t run a presidental campaign any better than that do you really want her in the White House when something bad happens??

[jimmyc1955]

libra127 - site anything incorrect in my evaluation of Hillaris or Obama''s campaign.

You may not like it - but it is acknowledged by every corrispondant who covers her campaign. The NY Times pointed out her campaigns out of control spending.

She has had double digit leads in all these races and is loosing them all to a candidate without a him once stating anything solid.

If she can''t beat Obama she is not qualified to be President.

[j-whitman]

jimmyc1955,,,,, Don''t go pulling a jwind 11 on us here son ---, People are brighter than you or your GOP give them credit for.

[j-whitman]

jimmyc1955..... Your post of Clinton or Obama being inexperianced is unrational..

And what facts or relevant data have you showed ????

[libra127]

Posted by jimmyc1955 at 10:35 PM : Mar 02, 2008

Frankly, jimmyc, your posts are about as insightful as a fortune cookie. Also nasty, mean, grasping, and reactionary. Drivel. Garbage, in fact.

[jimmyc1955]

j-whitman - post anything without bush in it. Make one single post that rationally compares Clinton to Obama. Please site facts or relevant data.

Failing to do that will prove your incapable of rational thought - please quit wasting electrons by posting drivel.

[jimmyc1955]

She isn''t so try to put the hooka pipe down and join reality.

She has displayed absolutely no characteristics in this campaign that lead me to believe she could manage office of the President of the United States.

She has no chief executive experience of any kind, doesn''t know how to organize a campaign, can''t find or stick to a good message and has let her husband undermine her campaign over and over. I sometimes think Bill is deliberately undermining her. He has done some remarkably stupid things.

Obama came from nowhere. Orgainized an efficient effective grass roots campaign and has won with a positive message of hope, not Hillarys tired drum beat of fear. People want hope and want to believe in a better tomorrow. Hillary only wants to scare them into voting for her.

[j-whitman]

jimmyc1955,,,, Dude,, Bush hasn''t been good for this country or any other except for countries like Yemen who still harbor Al Queda & allow recruitment.

[j-whitman]

jimmyc1955,,,, I''m not arguing weather or not her campaign is over, it just might be ---- It Texas I think she''s only what 2 points behind Obama ??

If she was running against Bush today, Bush would lose to her hands down in Bush''s own state.

[jimmyc1955]

j-whitman - I was simply pointing out that if the Bush twins are genetically disposed to behave as their father did - so should Chelsea.

BTW - A long string of women (one of whom bill was ready to leave hillary for) is hardly a single marital infidelity.

AGain - with bush. You should see a doctor about your neurotic compulsion - it can''t be good for you.

[jimmyc1955]

j-whitman - Your kind of slow on the pick up aren''t you?

I point out that Clinton''s campaign is a mess, a very well documented fact. I pointed out that a year ago she was acknowledge by all as the defacto Democratic front runner and it was her campaign to lose.

In recent weeks she has gone heavily negative and going more negative every day.

I pointed out that she has never run a campaign facing any real oppostion and that inexperience is showing itself.

All these are facts.

You ranting about bush is pointless unless you think that ranting about bush is a boost for Hillary.

Mostly I think your a shallow thinker who reaches into a small bag of meaningless phrases as if they are magic dust.