Comments on: Bachmann: "Submissive" doesn't mean subservient
Add a Comment
- Does anyone see the resemblence between the Newsweek photo and her pictures over the past two days? Stop whining. That's what she looks like, scary or not.
- Reply to this comment
- definition-Submissive: Ready to conform to authority or the will of others; meekly obedient or passive.
definition- Rep Bachmann: Idiot - Reply to this comment
- blah, blah, blah...if this is the best the GOP can do...bring it on!
So, does she do everything her husband tells her to do now? Who would be running our Country if this religious wacko wins?
She is just another Sarah Palin...what a joke! - Reply to this comment
- I suppose the term "knit-wit" doesn't mean idiot as well.
- Reply to this comment
- Just when I was beginning to have respect for her with the submissive thing she goes and gives us the feminazi definition for it. Blew that ship right out of the water.
- Reply to this comment
- Let's face it. Between Ms. Bachman and defaulted governor Palin we have two of the least competent people in the country. Their knowledge of almost everything is so in need. They are ignorant. The thought that they get so much attention is simply because of the weak leadership within the Republican party. I believe you could make a good argument that we will not have a Republican party in 2016.
- Reply to this comment
- Submissive might mean respect in her ever changing dictionary but the example she used to garner votes of getting a degree she did not want was subservient. A future President should know the difference.
- Reply to this comment
- Look in any thesaurus and subservient is a synonym of submissive. This woman does not grasp the English language and yet she wants to be president. Let's hope the voters are smart.
- Reply to this comment
- I find it incredible that none of the main stream media are even mentioning the real winner of the Iowa straw poll, Ron Paul. Bachmann's win means nothing. Iowans voted for her because she is from Iowa. Ron Paul has no connection with Iowa, yet he came within 153 votes of beating her on her home turf. Ron Paul was the only candidate who aroused any enthusiasm at the debate. The liberal media and the republican establishment don't like Ron Paul because he is not conforming to their conventional wisdom. He is the only candidate who has something new to offer. But many Americans are ready for something new and different because its clear that the old conventional wisdom isn't working.
- Reply to this comment
- Ah! A language expert too?!
OBAMA 2012! - Reply to this comment
