Comments on: About Us
Add a Comment
- Rep. Wasserman-Schultz could be the poster child for rudeness. She is constantly interrupting whoever is speaking. This is the attitude that when someone says something I disagree with I just shout them down. It is simply lacking in civility. She seems so sure that she is right that she doesn't even listen to other people. Must be a professional politician. And what kind of example is this settling for our children? Doesn't the host have a mute button so we can hear what both sides have to say? If this keeps up I will be forced to quit watching.
- Reply to this comment
- Rep. Wasserman-Schultz is my kind of politician in that she doesn't exercise political disarmament when debating the ugly opposition. Today, she put her boxing gloves on and stood her ground. Too often, Democrats engage in accommodation while the Republicans are in the game playing every elimination dirty trick known to humanity. While accommodation isn't weakness, per se, it's considered so when your political opponent is busy throwing haymakers. The Republicans learned that they have a better chance of winning when they simply don'y play fair. The Democrats have to, at the very least, stop taking haymakers to the chin. The voters are rarely sympathetic in the booth when they perceive either side as unable to defend their position and fight back with vigor.
- Reply to this comment
- Why do you talk about the tea party as if it were a single entity????
It is a number of supposedly not unified cells.
Many of the tea parties claim non-profit tax exempt status.
A few (very few) have racist platforms, Dan Patrict state senator in Texas said he makes sure he has no affiliation with those tea party organization. They (tea parties) claim not to be affiliated with each other and have no leader. Where does the money come from and where does it go? Who does the book keeping?
When refering to the tea party why not say which one and who it that group cell-organization you are refering to?
No one political leader claims to be a leader of the tea party (or the tea party movement).
By not explaining which Tea Party organization you are talking about you make it sound as if all the Tea Parties are organized and speak with one voice. If infact they all speak with one voice then the voices of those parties that have reprehensible platforms should be mentioned when you say "Tea Party"
This rambling is meant to be a question, and is probably not phrased very well. - Reply to this comment
- Axelrod, Graham, et.al. need to go. They are the problem, not the solution to the us vs. them mentality in Washington. They are still whining about each other even after the pie-in-the-face they took in the recent debt ceiling fiasco.
- Reply to this comment
- Axelrod, Graham, et.al. need to go. They are the problem, not the solution to the us vs. them mentality in Washington. They are still whining about each other even after the face-in-the-pie they took in the recent debt ceiling fiasco.
- Reply to this comment
- Bob is inflaming a debt problem by repeatedly saying SS checks may not go out. Someone provide him with an intelligent fact checker as this is erroneous. Unless Obama wants to stop the checks they must go out by law. All these old water carrying reps for the dems on news tv have driven me away. We need fair and balanced reporting.
- Reply to this comment
- I want to know why each proposal includes cuts to MC & SS & Vet benifits. Do any of the proposals include cuts to Congress & Administration's generous pay & benifits packages?
- Reply to this comment
- Your bottom line could not be more correct. Congress has become an extension of corporations and special interests. You can tell who do they serve ( and is not us), by what do they say. The only reform possible is to eliminate the lobby system, expose it for what it is, a free market of influence and congress is the product to be had. Let's cut cost by doing what corporations do, tie Congress's salary to results and you only get one week vacation!
- Reply to this comment
- The Ohio budget deficit has appeared since the previous Republican administration cut taxes. Ohio was exceeding the national average in growth before Kasich took office with employment increasing every month for 8 months. The 8 billion deficit he stated is not supported by facts which he has refused to release to the public and his plan to solve the deficit whatever it is to sell off state assets.
- Reply to this comment
- Why do these milquetoast "reporters" refuse to call fools like Cantor on their lies and BS?
- Reply to this comment
