Comments on: The scientific truth about climate change
Add a Comment
- hey loserville,
As I have challenged you many times before, find any reputable scientific organization or govt agency that supports your denial viewpoint, and we will have something to talk about.
Your silence is answer enough. - Reply to this comment
- BBould says: "Democrats want Cap and Trade to regulate green house gasses to increase taxes. Republicans don't want it because it is another tax on businesses."
LOL! Actually, "Cap & Trade" was originally a republican idea, just like mandated health care, so don't believe the faux nooz propaganda!
The Political History of Cap and Trade
How an unlikely mix of environmentalists and free-market conservatives hammered out the strategy known as cap-and-trade
Read more: http://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/Presence-of-Mind-Blue-Sky-Thinking.html#ixzz2C2RNt07U - Reply to this comment
- LOSERVILLE says: "Yamal tree ring data...is a good place to start."
YAWN......Steve McIntyre is free to do any analysis he wants on any data he can find. But when he ladles his work with unjustified and false accusations of misconduct and deception, he demeans both himself and his contributions. The idea that scientists should be bullied into doing analyses McIntyre wants and delivering the results to him prior to publication out of fear of very public attacks on their integrity is ludicrous.
By rights we should be outraged and appalled that (yet again) unfounded claims of scientific misconduct and dishonesty are buzzing around the blogosphere, once again initiated by Steve McIntyre, and unfailingly and uncritically promoted by the usual supporters. However this has become such a common occurrence that we are no longer shocked nor surprised that misinformation based on nothing but prior assumptions gains an easy toehold on the contrarian blogs (especially at times when they are keen to 'move on' from more discomforting events).
Keep up the "good work" with WUWT contrarian BLOGS! LOL! - Reply to this comment
- troutfishman says: loserville - Here is the bottom line:
You are not a scientist, and have no education or experience in the field of climatology. In fact, I question whether you have education or experience in ANYTHING based on your loopy posts.
I concur, since LOSERVILLE's ridiculous "loopy posts" contain nothing but anti-science propaganda, debunked long ago, and just like the GOP's forwarded e-mails and faux nooz republiCON talking points, they seem to have the need to recycle them over and over again, just to see how much of the slop will stick to the wall! LOL! - Reply to this comment
- troutfishman says: hey loserville,
As I have challenged you many times before, find any reputable scientific organization or govt agency that supports your denial viewpoint, and we will have something to talk about.
Until then, you do not warrant attention.
I agree, and all the while LOSERVILLE keeps posting the anti-science rants from anthony watts, his alter-ego steven goddard, and all his BLOG butt buddies, in order to disprove the science about the increasing CO2 levels in our atmosphere and oceans, and our steadily warming planet! LOL! - Reply to this comment
- Have you got some back up data for that since soon according to trout, slow,cydygitt2.... we will soon run out of fossil fuels so won't that threat automatically be mitigated without costing us a dime???
Actually, the last climate summit agreed that we have increased average temperatures 1 degree and that we cannot and must not increase it to 2 degrees.
It will take the addition of another approximately 600 megatons of CO2 to the atmosphere to get to 2 degrees. The oil corporations have enough petroleum reserves that if it is burned (and you know they are planning on doing that) it will add approximately 2,500 megatons of CO2. So do the math. - Reply to this comment
- If the answer is to cool the world, it can be done relatively quickly. Placing reflective matter high in the atmosphere can reduce the amount of the sun's energy reaching the surface drastically. After Krakatoa erupted late in the 19th century, there was a global "winter" due to the high levels of particulates it emitted. Carl Sagan warned of a "nuclear winter" should such a war erupt. So, we could introduce reflective particulates by any number of means, if cooling is what we want. The only problem: governments and politicians would not be able to increase taxes and dictate lifestyles, as they love to do on the pretext of anthropogenic global warming. Anyone for a new ice age? It's in our power to bring one about.
- Reply to this comment
- This fake debate is EXACTLY the reason we have to strip America of the influence of Wall Street corporations. Business and particularly big business is antithetical to the health and welfare and safety of all living things.
- Reply to this comment
- vista8635 says: "Fossil fuel usage is a modern 'progress trap': human extinction is quite possible, due to abrupt environmental and biological changes caused by global warming."
Good reason why all that carbon was sequestered for millions of years, and now has been released into our atmosphere in less than 200 years! - Reply to this comment
- LOSERVILLE says: "Don't forget the models predictions of Jeane Dixon tout man she nailed them."
LOL! Only in one's delusional mind.......
Though she made considerable effort to discern it, the most important detail -- the actual timing of the Antichrist's appearance -- eluded Jeane Dixon. Believing that she had witnessed his birth on February 5, 1962, amidst a rare "stellium" of the seven classical planets, and a total eclipse of the sun, she thought that the Antichrist would appear in 1992, as a Satanic echo of the fact that Christ's ministry began in his 30th year.
LOL! Just another religious wacko, like too many of the far-right today, trying to turn America into an anti-science theocracy!
OTOH, Nate Silver nailed both the 2008 and 2012 presidential elections, despite all the hate and discontent from the rightwingers that didn't believe him, but swallowed dickie morris' BS! - Reply to this comment
