Comments on: Inside The National Enquirer
Add a Comment
- if this potential presidential nominee had been a Republican, the inquirer would not have been the first to bring this story to the masses.
- Reply to this comment
- The last really UNBIASED news story to appear anywhere was the Iran/Contra scandal under the "TEFLON" President, Ronald Reagan. That was 20 years ago!!! Since then, the political parties, especially the neocon Fascist Nazi Republicans have gone to great lengths to make sure that NOTHING goes into print unless it damages the other party or achieves their own ends, and/or those of Corporate America!!!
It''s called CENSORSHIP, with Corporate moguls like Rupert Murdoch and political groups like the DNC, RNC and millionare "swiftboaters" telling us what is good to read and what is not! It doesn''t matter if it''s true or not, which in most cases, it isn''t!
This is FREEDOM OF THE PRESS, according to the neocon Fascist Nazi Republicans and Corporate America!!!!! Spread the BS and bury the truth!!!
That''s how National Socialism (Nazism) got started in Germany in 1930!!!
SIG HEIL, BUSH!!!!!!!
sig heil, HIS OLDER CLONE, "SURRRRRRGE!" McCain!!!!! - Reply to this comment
- Funny
Party A''s guy pulls a bonehead move and Party B''s people go Mad Cow over it.
Party B''s guy pulls a bonehead move and Party B''s people dismis, divert, justify, excuse and say things like "It''s nobody''s business and it''s not as bad as what that guy in Party A did". - Reply to this comment
- "If you want to know what the elitists of our country want you to think, you buy the New York Times."
Posted by ragnar30066
By "elitists" I assume you mean the people that own corportate America.
This is very simple:
1.Conservative Republican policies are far more favorable to big corporations than Liberal Democratic policies. This explains why corporate America (EXXON,Wal-Mart, etc.) donates far more money to Republicans.
2.The main-stream media is owned by big corporations.
Got it?
The idea that the main-stream media has a Liberal bias is complete nonsense on its face - Reply to this comment
- It used to be that nobody who wanted to be informed would buy the National Enquirer. They would buy the New York Times. Now if you want to be informed you buy the National Enquirer. If you want to know what the elitists of our country want you to think, you buy the New York Times.
That''s the bad news. The good news is the New York Times is going broke due to plummeting subscriptions and declining ad revenues. - Reply to this comment
- Once while working in Las Vegas, I was asked a couple of questions. I was busy and explained that I would be "off the clock" in five minutes and would be back.
Upon returning, I asked, "Are you really interested or do you just have inquiring minds?"
The man and his wife laughed! They both worked for the "National Enquirer!" - Reply to this comment
How the National Enquirer editor is registered to vote
This is how the Chairman and Editor, David Perel of the National Enquirer register to vote. One of the two has a concealed weapons permit.
webofdeception.com- Reply to this comment
- This is why people are suspicious of the mainstream media. The name of the previous owner of the Enquirer was not David, as in the story, but Generoso Pope, Jr. I know, I met him.
- Reply to this comment
- The funniest thing is when (in the first Men in Black movie) K goes to the newsstand for copies of the Nat''l Enquirer and other "newspapers" for information on aliens in the United States!
- Reply to this comment
- Since we don''t have real news anymore, the National Enquirer has become the business model for all "NEWS" departments in the media.
- Reply to this comment
