Comments on: Nancy Giles On Guns

With a Frontier Conquered, Why The Need For Packing Firearms?

Add a Comment See all 143 Comments
by bpro2008 June 30, 2008 12:28 PM EDT
By the way, Does anyone proof read Idiot/Racist Giles'' ***? Referencing "126 Women State Legislatures" instead of the correct "126 Women State Legislators" only reinforces the points being made that she did zero research before "formulating" this opinion.

Way to go CBS!
Reply to this comment
by royally June 30, 2008 12:05 PM EDT
I liked Andy Rooney''s comments on "60 Minutes" a while back. Statistics are statistics. Could there be a
"Federation of United Caucasians"? You bet there couldn''t! There is LEGAL discrimination & Illegal discrimination.
So how do we stop crime? The police will surely show up after the event and will take responsibility for solving it. The victim still has been victimized!
Don''t become the victim! Protect yourself and your loved ones by whatever means you can. If you don''t like guns, get pepper spray, learn one or two of the martial arts,if you wallet is deep get a body guard.
Educate yourself on the use of deadly force and when it is necessary.
I WILL USE WHATEVER MEANS POSSIBLE TO PROTECT MY LOVED ONES AND MYSELF!
Best regards,
Reply to this comment
by oneamerican1 June 30, 2008 11:31 AM EDT
Why would a program that is supposed to be news related lend credence to such an unfounded, biased and frankly embarrassing display of misguided emotion.

Nancy states that putting on a costume gun altered her perception and attitude. The implication is that she felt empowered and somehow dangerous? Are we to assume that an intelligent, educated person can be transformed into a deviant personality by touching an inanimate object? How sad to see that presented on a national program!

I''ve raised two girls that never played with guns because they were taught at an early age that guns weren''t toys, cruelty to animals was unacceptable, and respecting other human beings was important. They are adults now. They relate normally to others, still handle firearms safely and have showed no signs of this insidious transformation that Nancy claims to have experienced. Makes me wonder what Nancy feels behind the wheel of a car, an even bigger piece of steel, associated with far more deaths than guns.
Sorry, Nancy.. I''ll never again hear you name or see your face that I won''t doubt the credibility of your opinion... and the credibility of CBS as well, for allowing you to imply that the human race is destined to exhibit malevolent behavior. The answer is not expensive bullets that criminals would no doubt steal or the emotional ranting of self proclaimed experts. The answer is education.
Reply to this comment
by oneamerican1 June 30, 2008 11:30 AM EDT
Why would a program that is supposed to be news related lend credence to such an unfounded, biased and frankly embarrassing display of misguided emotion.

Nancy states that putting on a costume gun altered her perception and attitude. The implication is that she felt empowered and somehow dangerous? Are we to assume that an intelligent, educated person can be transformed into a deviant personality by touching an inanimate object? How sad to see that presented on a national program!

I''ve raised two girls that never played with guns because they were taught at an early age that guns weren''t toys, cruelty to animals was unacceptable, and respecting other human beings was important. They are adults now. They relate normally to others, still handle firearms safely and have showed no signs of this insidious transformation that Nancy claims to have experienced. Makes me wonder what Nancy feels behind the wheel of a car, an even bigger piece of steel, associated with far more deaths than guns.
Sorry, Nancy.. I''ll never again hear you name or see your face that I won''t doubt the credibility of your opinion... and the credibility of CBS as well, for allowing you to imply that the human race is destined to exhibit malevolent behavior. The answer is not expensive bullets that criminals would no doubt steal or the emotional ranting of self proclaimed experts. The answer is education.
Reply to this comment
by seebsyes June 30, 2008 6:13 AM EDT
I''''m a black male in my 30s. While I''''m offended by some of the prejudiced comments made in response to Nanny Guile''''s editorial, what offends me more is the ignorance exuded from my television early this morning.

For her to suggest that guns are the problem and not people, like herself, who view guns as tools to be used in an exercise of power, is purely ignorant and irresponsible.

I grew up in a home where my father owned several handguns. I knew friends who owned rifles and used them for hunting, yes, as children and none of them have ever killed anyone.

Lawful people buy and register their guns properly. CRIMINALS DO NOT! Lawful people will use their firearms for hunting and/or self defense only. CRIMINALS DO NOT! Do you think that laws restricting guns or bullets would keep a person with the intent of harming another person from doing so? Or do you think that a more personal criminal, who kills with a knife, blunt object or hands is a less threatening, kinder sort?

Reply to this comment
by circnavman June 30, 2008 12:15 AM EDT
We, Americans, do not take the responsibility for the liberties we have and we take them for granted. We allow everything by "rights": Driving, for instance, there are millions of people who drive that should never have been allowed to do so, they are dangerous beyond concept, they have in their hands weapons who can kill and maim with more brutality and carnage than a gun does.
Millions of people vote who do not have the IQ to understand the implication of their decision., they can kill a country with the push of a button; their weapon have far more implications that a gun.
Millions of people become parents that should never have had the right to become responsible for another life; more kids die or become rejects at the hands of irresponsible idiots who should not have been given the right to give birth. There are no test to judge if you are capable of having kids, there are no tests and education to assure that once you drive, you won''t kill someone by stupidity or carelessness. So let''s stop complaining about people owning guns. There are far more people being killed by the lack of responsibility or the lack of intelligence of others than by responsible gun owners. Compared to all the stupid things we allow morons to do because of their "rights", guns are a drop in the bucket.
Rights should be based on responsibility.
Stupid people should not vote, drive, own guns, have kids, or given any tools of means that allows them to have any influence on other people''s lives.
Reply to this comment
by putney_swope June 30, 2008 12:08 AM EDT
Dear Ms.Giles,
you are indeed fortunate that the great see BS pays YOU for this drivel.
Reply to this comment
by oneamerican1 June 29, 2008 11:46 PM EDT
Why would a program that is supposed to be news related lend credence to such an unfounded, biased and frankly embarrassing display of misguided emotion.

Nancy states that putting on a costume gun altered her perception and attitude. The implication is that she felt empowered and somehow dangerous? Are we to assume that an intelligent, educated person can be transformed into a deviant personality by touching an inanimate object? How sad to see that presented on a national program!

I''ve raised two girls that never played with guns because they were taught at an early age that guns weren''t toys, cruelty to animals was unacceptable, and respecting other human beings was important. They are adults now. They relate normally to others, still handle firearms safely and have showed no signs of this insidious transformation that Nancy claims to have experienced. Makes me wonder what Nancy feels behind the wheel of a car, an even bigger piece of steel, associated with far more deaths than guns.
Sorry, Nancy.. I''ll never again hear you name or see your face that I won''t doubt the credibility of your opinion... and the credibility of CBS as well, for allowing you to imply that the human race is destined to exhibit malevolent behavior. The answer is not expensive bullets that criminals would no doubt steal or the emotional ranting of self proclaimed experts. The answer is education.
Reply to this comment
by circnavman June 29, 2008 11:15 PM EDT
We, Americans, do not take the responsibility for the liberties we have and we take them for granted. We allow everything by "rights": Driving, for instance, there are millions of people who drive that should never have been allowed to do so, they are dangerous beyond concept, they have in their hands weapons who can kill and maim with more brutality and carnage than a gun does.
Millions of people vote who do not have the IQ to understand the implication of their decision., they can kill a country with the push of a button; their weapon have far more implications that a gun.
Millions of people become parents that should never have had the right to become responsible for another life; more kids die or become rejects at the hands of irresponsible idiots who should not have been given the right to give birth. There are no test to judge if you are capable of having kids, there are no tests and education to assure that once you drive, you won''t kill someone by stupidity or carelessness. So let''s stop complaining about people owning guns. There are far more people being killed by the lack of responsibility or the lack of intelligence of others than by responsible gun owners. Compared to all the stupid things we allow morons to do because of their "rights", guns are a drop in the bucket.
Rights should be based on responsibility.
Stupid people should not vote, drive, own guns, have kids, or given any tools of means that allows them to have any influence on other people''s lives.
Reply to this comment
by circnavman June 29, 2008 11:13 PM EDT
We, Americans, do not take the responsibility for the liberties we have and we take them for granted. We allow everything by "rights": Driving, for instance, there are millions of people who drive that should never have been allowed to do so, they are dangerous beyond concept, they have in their hands weapons who can kill and maim with more brutality and carnage than a gun does.
Millions of people vote who do not have the IQ to understand the implication of their decision., they can kill a country with the push of a button; their weapon have far more implications that a gun.
Millions of people become parents that should never have had the right to become responsible for another life; more kids die or become rejects at the hands of irresponsible idiots who should not have been given the right to give birth. There are no test to judge if you are capable of having kids, there are no tests and education to assure that once you drive, you won''t kill someone by stupidity or carelessness. So let''s stop complaining about people owning guns. There are far more people being killed by the lack of responsibility or the lack of intelligence of others than by responsible gun owners. Compared to all the stupid things we allow morons to do because of their "rights", guns are a drop in the bucket.
Rights should be based on responsibility.
Stupid people should not vote, drive, own guns, have kids, or given any tools of means that allows them to have any influence on other people''s lives.
Reply to this comment
See all 143 Comments
  • MOST POPULAR
Discussed
  1. Tempers Flare In Climate Change Flap

    (645 recent comments)

Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: