Comments on: Vaccines and autism: a new scientific review
Add a Comment
- How about forced mass vaccination in the U.S. with "franken-viruses"? The reality of vaccine "madness" keeps getting stranger by the day. There really is a lot that we can learn from the H1N1 Pandemic Flu Fraud and Hysteria of 2009. History could easily repeat itself, unless we educate ourselves. Dr A. True Ott, PhD, ND has looked into the subject in detail. At first, I was skeptical, but the more I read about these events, and the hemorrhagic pneumonic plague in the Ukraine, the less skeptical I became. I really do wonder what is more dangerous - the wild-type "germ", the lab virus, or the jab?
http://atrueott.wordpress.com/
"The scientists made 127 hybrid viruses by mixing genes of the H1N1 and the avian H9N2 virus in a laboratory, and eight of the hybrids turned out to be more virulent than either parents when tested in mice."
""The possibility of novel pandemic strains being generated from reassortment between avian H9N2 and H1N1/2009 influenza viruses exists."
"Flu viruses have eight gene segments and one of the segments is called the PA gene. Interestingly, all eight dangerous hybrids carried the PA gene belonging to the H1N1 parent virus. The eight hybrid viruses caused severe pneumonia, edema and hemorrhaging in infected mice, the experts wrote."
"Experts believe that a classic way for hybrid viruses to form is when different viruses meet and "marry" inside a single host, swapping genes. Humans and animals, such as pigs, can be efficient "mixing vessels."
"Novavax will develop new technology to make vaccines using insect cells. VaxInnate will develop technology that combines influenza and bacteria proteins to stimulate strong immune response against the flu." - Reply to this comment
- Pharma is using Franken-viruses to morph our kids into Franken-kids. Personally, I choose to opt-out. I don't want any part of that insanity.
I'm reminded of "Prevenile" the new "chimeric" vaccine for horses against West Nile Virus. Hmmmm. What ever happened to that vaccine? What ever happened to the poor horses? Sudden death? Cytokine storm?" - Reply to this comment
- My daughter was damaged by MMR 16 years ago. no doubt what so ever!my doctor reported it but was overruled,say no more.Mike.
- Reply to this comment
- Dr. Ratajczak, THANK YOU for your braving in performing this analysis. There's know doubt you knew you would be butting a bulls eye on your back for doing so and thank you Sharyl for report the findings.
Ratajczak told us in an interview, "the body's immune system being thrown out of balance."
I have always believed that the rise in autoimmune asthma, type 1 diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis in children and the gross increase in autism bears the same cause as autism..."the immune system being thrown out of balance" by childhood vaccines.
While the rate of mortality in infants has declined from infectious disease it has skyrocketed based on other causes. While at the same time the war on "infectious disease" has been waged by the CDC the US has fallen to one of the worst countries in the world as so far as infant mortality is concerned. Isn't that a head scratcher? Why would the US's infant mrtatlity rate be so deplorable when the CDC is celebrating the effectiveness of their vaccine program. What is causing the US to rank among third world countries in infant mortality? The answer...we've replaced infectious disease with an outrageous rate of vaccine injury. - Reply to this comment
- You can add this whole thing into our economy woes. We defer our debts to tomorrow knowing fully well we won't be able to pay then either. How does this link to Autism?
We are "saving" the pharma companies from getting bankrupted by lawsuits by constantly "disproving" the links between vaccines & autism. In turn we continue creating these kids that will need lifetime care, therapy and medication which will ultimately cost our country 1000x more.
I for one believe there are multiple factors at play causing the Autism spike, not just vaccine issues. In the last 25 years besides going from 11 vaccines to 39 we also: Do monthly sonograms during pregnancy instead of 1 or 2 and there are BILLIONS of wireless devices. The army has experimented with sonic weapons and it has been proven many times that cell phones affect sperm. Look it up, it's all legitimate. - Reply to this comment
- Good for you CBS for posting this! It's nice to see both sides of this story.
- Reply to this comment
- "Ratajczak agrees that nobody has proven DNA causes autism; but argues nobody has shown the opposite, and scientifically, the case is still open."
Yes. Also, no-one has shown eating too much cheese before bedtime causes autism, but nobody has shown the opposite. No-one has shown that exposure to hamsters causes autism, but no-one has shown the opposite. Clearly, scientifically the case is still open on these hypotheses. - Reply to this comment
- RESTORE CENSORED PARAGRAPH!!!!!!
" Ratajczak also looks at a factor that hasn't been widely discussed: human DNA contained in vaccines. That's right, human DNA. Ratajczak reports that about the same time vaccine makers took most thimerosal out of most vaccines (with the exception of flu shots which still widely contain thimerosal), they began making some vaccines using human tissue. Ratajczak says human tissue is currently used in 23 vaccines. She discusses the increase in autism incidence corresponding with the introduction of human DNA to MMR vaccine, and suggests the two could be linked. Ratajczak also says an additional increased spike in autism occurred in 1995 when chicken pox vaccine was grown in human fetal tissue." - Reply to this comment
- Let's call a spade a spade. There's tons of quality research showing the vaccine to autism link, just well hidden, not to mention tens of thousands of parents who know very well what caused their kids to drop through a hole. The government has been lying for maybe just about as long as it can get away with. Perhaps the problem is getting a little too big to hide.
- Reply to this comment
- Thank you for pursuing and writing this story. You're one of the reporters whose work I like to read and since you aren't afraid to get into the heart of subjects, ask unpopular questions and expose evidence & opinions that challenge the prevailing views.
I'm not surprised if information about DNA in vaccines has been edited from this article. Telling Americans that there is DNA from human fetal tissue in 23 vaccines gives them good reason for religious exemptions for those shots.
"This is a review of theories. Science is based on facts. To draw conclusions on effects of an exposure on people, you need data on people. The data on people do not support that there is a relationship. As such, any speculation about an explanation for a (non-existing) relationship is irrelevant."
Wow if this guy if looking for "data on people", someone tell him to give me a call. I got people and I got data and both were written off by doctors time and time again and never reported. Anyone else have people and data that was ignored?
If the ruling medical establishment keeps refusing to look at the "data on people" that IS out there, then they can effectively keep trumpeting the view that vaccines are safe. Supporters of orthodox views in medicine have always had tactical advantages over challengers and I don't see why this subject would be any different than countless others in medicine where prevailing views took years or decades to be overturned. But thanks to reporters like Ms Atkinson, at least members of the public can get access to opinions and the science that challenge the prevailing view. - Reply to this comment
