Comments on: Supreme Court Shoots Down D.C. Gun Ban
5-4 Ruling Says Washington's 32-Year-Old Ban Incompatible With 2nd Amendment
Add a Comment See all 993 Comments
- Classic lib remarks by fools on this useless liberal media post:
Dumber than dirt John McCain backs the decision of the Supreme Renegades. John McCain, closet neocon, unabridged traitor who pissses all over the US Constitution, a Republicon PArty trademark.
free speech (with regard to pornography but not conservative talk radio),
How does that compare with just gun related murders in America on a pro rata basis.
How many more innocent people are going to die as a result of this ruling.
Wow, such brilliance and I went to a liberal arts university myself. This dribble is amazing ! Bla, Bla, Bla, lib sense since their dribble started with the flower child movement of the 60''s. - Reply to this comment
- Stick1770--
The point of my examples are that they are neither planned nor "stupid." They are the acts of smart law-abiding citizens who momentarily lose their tempers or in the case of people who go postal at work the result of mental illness. Guns are dangerous objects which serve no other beneficial purpose in society. We don''t let people possess dynamite or hand grenades for exactly the same reason. - Reply to this comment
- Do I have to tell all you Anti-American, gun-hating, whining, liberal, pseudo-intellectuals which part of my body to kiss?
HA!
Posted by smcoh326 at 10:25 AM : Jun 26, 2008
They can''t - your head is in the way... - Reply to this comment
- Only a Nazi loving fascist would over rule the 2nd Amendment of the US Constitution which clearly states that only a well regulated militia has the right to bear arms.
Posted by neoconism at 06:46 PM : Jun 26, 2008
And most states do not have "well regulated militias" because Bush has them in Iraq... - Reply to this comment
- Ok enough with the sarcasm about the tragedy of kids getting ahold of guns and killing themselves, or "law abiding citizens" losing it and grabbing a gun to kill their wife or co-workers.
The bottom line is that this government is not required by law, constitution or any other means to protect the people from stupidity. And that is exactly where we are headed.
It is quickly becoming a country of lazy, finger pointing, not taking responsibilty for their actions country. Get off your butts and get to work. Stop sitting around waiting for others to take care of you when a problem arises. Enough of droning on and on about New Orleans and how bad people have it. Pick yourself up and get on to making it.
It is "YOUR" life and "YOUR" responsible for how it turns out and what you have.
The solution is not to take what others have and hand it out to those who want to play helpless and victim to everything.
The government can not protect you from stupidity.
Let''s get back to what made this country in the first place. Hard work and Responsiblity.
Everything you need or want is out there for the people willing to get off their butts and go get it.
Nothing is written that guarentees that you get what the others have just by saying it isn''t fair. If you want a country that you can get up every day and not have to think about what to do or where to go and have the government dictate your every move. Move to China or Russia. - Reply to this comment
- I''m voting REPUBLICAN because I believe that every bedroom in America should have a government installed surveillance cameras so the conservative reich can monitor everyone we choose to sleep with and whether we engage only in govt approved acts.
Im Voting REPUBLICAN because I agree we are a Christian state and that we should have Christian public schools where students learn only how to pray to the Christian God and pledge allegiance to the cross and Ten Commandments posted in every classroom. Infidels who refuse will be expelled.
I''m voting REPUBLICAN so we can keep watch over the private medical discussions between a woman and her doctor to ensure she makes only state approved reproductive decisions.
I''m voting REPUBLICAN so little children can die from malnutrition and lack of medical care because we cut compassionate programs in order to let the rich upgrade their yachts.
I''m voting McCain -- Sich Heil the Fourth Reich!!!! - Reply to this comment
There were a total of 203 murders by all methods in Australia last year.
How does that compare with just gun related murders in America on a pro rata basis.
How many more innocent people are going to die as a result of this ruling.
Von Marko you need physiatric help.- Reply to this comment
- how bout we just let van_marko talk to himself?
- Reply to this comment
- I think we should Arm all the Bears now!
I mean Polar Bears not Chicago Bears. Even though Polar Bears kill more humans than Alligators, they need more protection.
And all those Chicago Bears fans in Obamas senate district should be immediately disarmed!! Obama 2008!! - Reply to this comment
- Posted by von_marko at 07:31 PM : Jun 26, 2008
- I hope they''re paying you slightly more than minimum wage to spread your useless rhetoric. Get a life, and a real job. - Reply to this comment
- I''m voting Democrat because I believe in minority rights (except in Muslim countries), free speech (with regard to pornography but not conservative talk radio), environmentalism (unless we''re talking about Al Gore''s house), diplomacy (but never backed by the threat of military force) and a woman%u2019s right to kill her baby (but not societies right to execute serial killers.)
Oh, and of course the right to marry goats and pay $99 a gallon for gas. - Reply to this comment
- ALL MURDERERS WERE ONCE LAW ABIDING GUN OWNERS! ---
Posted by MarkS7177 at 07:19 PM : Jun 26, 2008
-I disagree. Most murderers were thugs in their youth. If someone is a law-abiding gun owner, they wouldn''t commit murder. If someone cracks and decides they are going to commit murder, if there is no gun around, they will find a knife, a car, poison, etc. The murderer is the problem, not the guns. - Reply to this comment
- If von_marko shows up at my house, I will shoot first, and ask questions later because it is my RIGHT to own guns.
Incidentally, I''ve owned several of them long enough that they are not registered. - Reply to this comment
- Obama Free Trade Policy:
1. Trade all your hard earned income in to the Government.
2. Trade in your freedom and security for whatever other countries think is best for us.
3. Trade your car in for a bus ticket.
4. Trade your future in for a repeat of the Carter years.
5. Trade security for "hope"
6. Trade paychecks for welfare checks
7. Trade "God Bless America" for "God D*** America"
8. Trade Victory for Surrender
9. Trade %u201CI have a dream%u201D for %u201CNightmare on Obama Street%u201D
10. Trade $2000 campaign contribution for a whatever you want.
11. Trade %u201CA chicken in every pot%u201D for %u201C A pot smoking chicken%u201D
12. Trade your Bible for a Koran
13. Trade buying your cat food for eating cat food
14. Trade driving to work for working just to afford to drive
15. Trade social justice for Socialist justice
16. Trade %u201CCommon Good%u201D for %u201CCommunism is Good%u201D - Reply to this comment
- A lot of people have talked about how ''unprofitable'' it is for companies to venture on new drilling opportunities in the US due to the start-up costs. What if regular, everyday citizens formed a conglomerate to do so via small and reasonable donations and hired a few experts away from some of the big oil firms to run the project? Then we''d really have a voice then.....
- Reply to this comment
- I%u2019m voting Democrat because I don%u2019t think the US Constitution should be uniformly applied without restrictions to all citizens.
The right to keep and bear arms should apply in Alabama but not in New York City. Just in the same way that African Americans should be allowed to vote in New York City but only African Americans who own property should be allowed to vote in Alabama.
The right to kill your baby is ok, but the right to kill someone elses baby who grew up to be a serial killer, is NOT ok.
That%u2019s why I%u2019m voting democrat, because the Constitution should be interpreted on a case by case basis. BARRACK AKBAR 2008! - Reply to this comment
- Thank God the Activist Supremes protected the right of "law abiding citizens" to possess weapons. Like the law abiding man who doesn''t even have a parking ticket snapping one morning and using the convenient weapon in his house to blow away several other law abiding citizens where he works. Or maybe the law abiding husband, maybe a deacon in his church, who loses his temper for a split second in an argument with his wife and picks up an easy access weapon to blow her away. Or the law abiding little toddler whose greatest crime is using his crayons on the wall finding his law abiding daddy''s gun in a nighstand and accidently blowing his brains all over the room.
The gun nuts want to frame everything in terms of criminals and law abdiing citizens like the whole world is really one big John Wayne or Dirty Harry movie where it''s good versus bad. Most gun victims are law abdiing citizens killed by fellow law abdiing citizens with easy access to weapons who lose their tempers and in that brief moment commit their "crime." - Reply to this comment
- Your report misses the main point. The Court ruled that the 2nd is not unlimited. D.C. will have to allow ownership of a handgun in the home but can now fingerprint,register,keep records to prevent a felon from purchasing. Also, cities and states are now clear to regulate types of weapons owned, where and how they may be used-if at all. The only thing the Court allows is for gun ownership IN THE HOME.
- Reply to this comment
- In arguing that the country should back off a policy that causes too much pain, Obama adviser Danzig said, Winnie the Pooh seems to me to be a fundamental text on national security.
Obama said "I beleive in the right to arm pooh bear" - Reply to this comment
- Hey SHURCH4TRUTH
What ridiculous statement. The criminals already have guns and are elready killing people. As a result of this decision law abiding citizens can usw guns to protect themselves. - Reply to this comment
