the femocrats are unhappy with this because it will prevent all of the illegals,(mexicans), from being allowed to vote. it should be implemented for all of the right reasons.if you cant, or wont prove that you are a legal american voter, then you shouldnt have a vot on the issues facing america.maybe the femocrats should focus on the americans already here, instead of trying to sell them out for illegals!
Getting a picture ID isn''t that easy. It''s not free, a birth certificate is required, and in some cases, people must travel to the county seat to apply. My grandmother is 81 years old, never got a driver''s license, and does not have a picture ID. The folks at the bank have known her for years and happily cash her Social security checks. She was born at home and doesn''t know where her birth ceticiate is. Actually she doesn;t know if she ever had a birth certificate. Grandma has voted in every important election since 1948. Why is Grandma''s right to vote being stolen from her unless she jumps through a bunch of hoops?
"The only people who are for this are for dead people having the right to vote - several times. Posted by SignOf4 at 02:52 PM : Sep 25, 2007"
Like these guys in Franklin county, Ohio ?
"According to the AP, "Franklin County''s unofficial results had Bush receiving 4,258 votes to Democrat John Kerry''s 260 votes in a precinct in Gahanna. Records show only 638 voters cast ballots in that precinct. Bush''s total should have been recorded as 365."
In that case, if I honestly feel I should have more than one vote as I am important, or disenfranchised, or special, or whatever and don''''t see it as a moral wrong, I''''m voting early and often. Better yet, let me vote by internet so I can write a program to do it for me.
How funny -- you are trying to be sarcastic, but that''s exactly what repuglicans are trying to do. They want internet voting yesterday, so they can fix every future election that is close or that matters.
When all ID''s are completely free and available to all citizens then OK. While the states charge $''s for ID''s, this is no better than a poll tax.
As for signof4 - just take your bigoted little brain back to Fox News where no doubt you came from, and leave this site to those with IQ''s higher than their age.
Are You Mad As H3LL Like Me Join A Local Meetup Group In Your City Today And Be Heard. Join The Millions In The New ReVoLuTiOn To Take America Back! Actions Speak Louder Than Words! Go To: http://ronpaul.meetup.com/cities/
If blacks oppose it, I''m for it. That''s all I need to know. The only people who are for this are for dead people having the right to vote - several times. In other words, lying democrats.
I admit that I don''t understand the argument of those who oppose showing ID. Either you are who you say you are, or you''re not. Anyone can claim to be anyone, and while photo ID isn''t perfect (it can be faked), it seems to me to be a reasonable request.
I don''t agree with Judge Evans at all -- I don''t see how a law that requires all voters to prove their identity is anti-Democratic Party. If we only asked minorities to show ID, he would be right and I would oppose it. In every case though, the law has required all voters to prove their identification -- rich and poor, white and black. How anyone can see that as predujucial is inconcievable to me.
The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks is prohibited. By using this Web site you agree to accept our Terms of Service. Click here to read the Rules of Engagement.
Reply to Comment The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks is prohibited. By using this Web site you agree to accept our Terms of Service. Click here to read the Rules of Engagement.
Posted by SignOf4 at 02:52 PM : Sep 25, 2007"
Like these guys in Franklin county, Ohio ?
"According to the AP, "Franklin County''s unofficial results had Bush receiving 4,258 votes to Democrat John Kerry''s 260 votes in a precinct in Gahanna. Records show only 638 voters cast ballots in that precinct. Bush''s total should have been recorded as 365."
Posted by smartmoney70 at 01:52 PM : Sep 25, 2007"
By getting rid of Diebold machines and paperless voting.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by smartmoney70 at 01:52 PM : Sep 25, 2007
How funny -- you are trying to be sarcastic, but that''s exactly what repuglicans are trying to do. They want internet voting yesterday, so they can fix every future election that is close or that matters.
As for signof4 - just take your bigoted little brain back to Fox News where no doubt you came from, and leave this site to those with IQ''s higher than their age.
I don''t agree with Judge Evans at all -- I don''t see how a law that requires all voters to prove their identity is anti-Democratic Party. If we only asked minorities to show ID, he would be right and I would oppose it. In every case though, the law has required all voters to prove their identification -- rich and poor, white and black. How anyone can see that as predujucial is inconcievable to me.