Comments on: Roberts Assures President He's Fine
Chief Justice Calls Bush After Suffering Seizure; White House Says Roberts Is "In Great Spirits"
Add a Comment See all 251 Comments
- Reading some of these posts from these alleged "tolerant" liberals makes me realize that liberals don't know the definition of the word "tolerant"
...
It WASN'T the Bush administration that used tanks and helicopters to attack & kill Americans on our own soil like the previous administration did at Waco.
Also, it WASN'T the Bush administration that shredded the Constitution by replacing "freddom of speech" with "political correctness".
That was also the previous administration, comrade.
... - Reply to this comment
- "We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction."
Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), Dec. 8, 2002.
"[W]ithout question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response to his contin ued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction ... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real ..."
Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003.
Apparently he had quite a bit of incentive to prove his case now didn't he. - Reply to this comment
- "There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years ... We also should remember we have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction."
Sen. Jay Rockerfeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002.
"He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years, every significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and destroy his chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity. This he has refused to do"
Rep. Henry Waxman (D, CA), Oct. 10, 2002.
"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members ... It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."
Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002.
Just a few who helped us along into this "so-called mess" - Reply to this comment
- This is an excellant post. . . .
Posted by mudrose
excellant?
"D-" for spelling - Reply to this comment
- Please point me to the amendment that Bush sponsored that changed the Constitution. I must have missed that unless it happened in your kooky little fantasy world.
Nice try little Stalin.
Posted by processor2 at 10:29 AM : Jul 31, 2007
First of all I didn't say Bush changed the Constitution. I said "The Constitution isn't being re-written, followed, or shredded by this administration - it's ignoring it."
You said Clinton changed it - "Also, it WASN'T the Bush administration that shredded the Constitution by replacing "freddom of speech" with "political correctness".
If you really want proof of their hatred for the Constitution just look at the Patriot Act.
By the way, publishing a post 20 times doesn't give it any intelligence. - Reply to this comment
- The research says nearly all anti-psychotic drugs increase the likelihood of seizures. Roberts was just getting off a boat which uses a 2 cycle engine which emits very high levels of the chemicals benzene and dioxin.
Posted by tampareads
This is an excellant post. I hope you have said something. However, I'm going to tuck this away for future reference. Thanks. - Reply to this comment
- Posted by mudrose at 10:16 AM : Jul 31, 2007
If they were in full agreement before, during, and after Clinton was in office, then why wasn't authorization given before 9/11 if they posed such a grave threat? Congress was in the republican majority and could have easily passed authorization. Could it be that Clinton knew going in would be a disaster? Could it be that he didn't just blindly go in never once thinking about the aftermath / consequences?
As far as not having clear information, it was Bush that ordered Richard Clarke to "find a connection" between 9/11 and Iraq. When none existed, he had the CIA create the intelligence saying they had WMD's. They based their intelligence on the Iraqi defector code named "curveball" that both Germany and France warned us was unreliable. It turns out most of his family was killed by Saddam Hussein's army and he was looking for revenge. Wilson warned about the yellow cake from Niger being untrue MONTHS before the invasion. Anyone else would have said, "Hmmm - something's not quite right. Let's put our invasion of Iraq on hold until we have all the correct information." Not this frigg*in' idiot - he just plowed us into a disaster that we can't get out of. All the while with your full support. I guess that makes you a frigg*in' idiot too. - Reply to this comment
- mudrose-shutup. You've been floating in the bowl to long. Time to flush.
Posted by rushlimpdrug
Take a hike Cyclopes. I'll shut up when I'm d/amn well ready. If you dont' like what I post, don't respond to it. - Reply to this comment
- It WASN'T the Bush administration that used tanks and helicopters to attack & kill Americans on our own soil like the previous administration did at Waco.
Also, it WASN'T the Bush administration that shredded the Constitution by replacing "freddom of speech" with "political correctness".
That was also the previous administration, comrad.
...
Posted by processor2 at 10:12 AM : Jul 31, 2007
Kent State May 1970 - Reply to this comment
- Please point me to the amendment that Clinton sponsored that changed the Constitution. I must have missed that unless it happened in your kooky little fantasy world.
Posted by hungry1968 at 10:23 AM : Jul 31, 2007
HUNGRY1968
Please point me to the amendment that Bush sponsored that changed the Constitution. I must have missed that unless it happened in your kooky little fantasy world.
Nice try little Stalin.
... - Reply to this comment
- Please point me to the amendment that Clinton sponsored that changed the Constitution. I must have missed that unless it happened in your kooky little fantasy world.
Posted by hungry1968 at 10:23 AM : Jul 31, 2007
HUNGRY1968
Please point me to the amendment that Bush sponsored that changed the Constitution. I must have missed that unless it happened in your kooky little fantasy world.
Nice try little Stalin.
... - Reply to this comment
- Please point me to the amendment that Clinton sponsored that changed the Constitution. I must have missed that unless it happened in your kooky little fantasy world.
Posted by hungry1968 at 10:23 AM : Jul 31, 2007
HUNGRY1968
Please point me to the amendment that Bush sponsored that changed the Constitution. I must have missed that unless it happened in your kooky little fantasy world.
Nice try little Stalin.
... - Reply to this comment
- Please point me to the amendment that Clinton sponsored that changed the Constitution. I must have missed that unless it happened in your kooky little fantasy world.
Posted by hungry1968 at 10:23 AM : Jul 31, 2007
HUNGRY1968
Please point me to the amendment that Bush sponsored that changed the Constitution. I must have missed that unless it happened in your kooky little fantasy world.
Nice try little Stalin.
... - Reply to this comment
- Please point me to the amendment that Clinton sponsored that changed the Constitution. I must have missed that unless it happened in your kooky little fantasy world.
Posted by hungry1968 at 10:23 AM : Jul 31, 2007
HUNGRY1968
Please point me to the amendment that Bush sponsored that changed the Constitution. I must have missed that unless it happened in your kooky little fantasy world.
Nice try little Stalin.
... - Reply to this comment
- Please point me to the amendment that Clinton sponsored that changed the Constitution. I must have missed that unless it happened in your kooky little fantasy world.
Posted by hungry1968 at 10:23 AM : Jul 31, 2007
HUNGRY1968
Please point me to the amendment that Bush sponsored that changed the Constitution. I must have missed that unless it happened in your kooky little fantasy world.
Nice try little Stalin.
... - Reply to this comment
- Please point me to the amendment that Clinton sponsored that changed the Constitution. I must have missed that unless it happened in your kooky little fantasy world.
Posted by hungry1968 at 10:23 AM : Jul 31, 2007
HUNGRY1968
Please point me to the amendment that Bush sponsored that changed the Constitution. I must have missed that unless it happened in your kooky little fantasy world.
Nice try little Stalin.
... - Reply to this comment
- Please point me to the amendment that Clinton sponsored that changed the Constitution. I must have missed that unless it happened in your kooky little fantasy world.
Posted by hungry1968 at 10:23 AM : Jul 31, 2007
HUNGRY1968
Please point me to the amendment that Bush sponsored that changed the Constitution. I must have missed that unless it happened in your kooky little fantasy world.
Nice try little Stalin.
... - Reply to this comment
- Please point me to the amendment that Clinton sponsored that changed the Constitution. I must have missed that unless it happened in your kooky little fantasy world.
Posted by hungry1968 at 10:23 AM : Jul 31, 2007
HUNGRY1968
Please point me to the amendment that Bush sponsored that changed the Constitution. I must have missed that unless it happened in your kooky little fantasy world.
Nice try little Stalin.
... - Reply to this comment
- Seizures can happen at anytime once you have had one.That is why I have to take Carbamazepine daily.I had one and woke up in the emergency room freaked out yrs ago.I'm am so thankful I wasn't driving when that happened.I had never had one before,and I was 36 yrs old when it started.He is the Big Dog for the Justice's I hope he will be alright.We have enough *** going on with our country we need no more at this moment!
- Reply to this comment
- One more thing, I may be liberal , but I'm not unborn-child hating, or freedom hating, but you right wing nut jobs are seriously starting to p-iss me off!
Posted by nolalou
Now you know how we feel after 33 years. A group of fem-i-nuts who decided to form their own society because of their hatred of men concocted a system whereby they can lay their eggs anywhere they want and if they don't want them to abort them, store them in clinics like clothing, all with the Court's help and call them anything but life is a bit too much for us. The best is partial birth abortion - whereby the doctors clamp the feet of an infant in the womb to pull him out in breach fashion, that is feet first, and when they reach the neck, puncture a hole in it's head and suck out its brains. And the ladies on the Hill are affronted that the Courts rule against this procedure? And you're getting pissed off. Really? - Reply to this comment
Mike Huckabee on GOP "rock stars," 2012, health care reform and more.
