Comments on: Sotomayor Promises "Fidelity to the Law"

Supreme Court Nominee Shares Her Personal Life Experiences but Promises Decisions Based on Impartial Justice

Add a Comment See all 62 Comments
by hungry1968-16 July 13, 2009 5:11 PM EDT
by beaumuff July 13, 2009 2:00 PM PDT
I think Paris Hilton would have been the logical choice.







Paris Hilton would have been a better choice than Harriet Meiers!!
Reply to this comment
by erb0087 July 13, 2009 5:08 PM EDT
"From the beginning, the American Philosophical Society attracted some of America's finest minds. Early members included George Washington, John Adams, Thomas Jefferson, Alexander Hamilton, Thomas Paine, David Rittenhouse, Owen Biddle, Benjamin Rush, James Madison, Michael Hillegas, and John Marshall. The Society also drew philosophers from other nations as members, including Alexander von Humboldt, the Marquis de Lafayette, Baron von Steuben, Tadeusz Kosciuszko, and Yekaterina Romanovna Vorontsova-Dashkova.

...Illustrious names have continually been added to the membership roster, reflecting the society's scope. Charles Darwin, Robert Frost, Louis Pasteur, Elizabeth Cabot Agassiz, John James Audubon, Linus Pauling, Margaret Mead, Maria Mitchell, and Thomas Edison became members of the Society. The Society continues to attract names of high renown today, with a current membership list (as of the April 2005 elections) of 920 members, including 772 Resident members (citizens or residents of the United States) and 148 Foreign members representing more than two dozen countries." - Wikipedia

And in 2002 Sonia Sotomayor was elected to membership.
Reply to this comment
by erb0087 July 13, 2009 5:01 PM EDT
Sonia Sotomayor was elected a member of the American Philosophical Society in 2002.

The American Philosophical Society was founded in 1743 by Benjamin Franklin, a wise white male.
Reply to this comment
by erb0087 July 13, 2009 5:08 PM EDT
"From the beginning, the American Philosophical Society attracted some of America's finest minds. Early members included George Washington, John Adams, Thomas Jefferson, Alexander Hamilton, Thomas Paine, David Rittenhouse, Owen Biddle, Benjamin Rush, James Madison, Michael Hillegas, and John Marshall. The Society also drew philosophers from other nations as members, including Alexander von Humboldt, the Marquis de Lafayette, Baron von Steuben, Tadeusz Kosciuszko, and Yekaterina Romanovna Vorontsova-Dashkova.

...Illustrious names have continually been added to the membership roster, reflecting the society's scope. Charles Darwin, Robert Frost, Louis Pasteur, Elizabeth Cabot Agassiz, John James Audubon, Linus Pauling, Margaret Mead, Maria Mitchell, and Thomas Edison became members of the Society. The Society continues to attract names of high renown today, with a current membership list (as of the April 2005 elections) of 920 members, including 772 Resident members (citizens or residents of the United States) and 148 Foreign members representing more than two dozen countries." - Wikipedia

And in 2002 Sonia Sotomayor was elected to membership.
by beaumuff July 13, 2009 5:00 PM EDT
I think Paris Hilton would have been the logical choice.
Reply to this comment
by tmittelstaed July 13, 2009 7:25 PM EDT
I never thought i'd see Roseanne Barr confirmed to the US Supreme Court.
by culturechang July 13, 2009 4:59 PM EDT
Fidelity to which law? Constitutional law or partisan political legislation by one part or another. The problem is that few of them really understand the role as judge. Judges are supposed to protect the people from the govt. That is the check and balance. Few judges realize that.
Reply to this comment
by drsam8 July 13, 2009 4:57 PM EDT
Senators Diane Feinstein and Sheldon Whitehouse said it like it is: Republicans shout about what they call the "judicial activism" of the other side. Sen. Whitehouse (Rhode Island) made a most forceful argument for progressive judges, exposing Republican hypocrisy. Democratic Presidents have tended to be overly cautious, even mildly timid. Republican Presidents have acted boldly to install justices with extreme right wing views. They have used the euphemism of "strict constructionists" to secure their wishes. Thus have they installed unabashed rightists such as Scalia, Clarence Thomas and Alito. Democratic appointees to the bench are mildly left of center. The court cannot become a citadel for ordinary citizens, especially minorities (gays, lesbians, ethnics, women, religious groups, atheists, etc) can ultimately retreat if they ignore issues of equity and fundamental justice. That is what is wrong with the current composition of the Supreme Court! Right wing judges routinely trumpet a hard vision of ideological finality. Yet, the law is not mathematics with very predictable results. Rightists, unlike Democrats, deny that they put their own particular gloss, cultural predispositions and philosophic orientation in their interpretation of the constitution. Hamiton was wrong when he asserted in No. 78 of The Federalist that the judiciary has "neither force nor will, but merely judgement." Frankfurther reminded us that "It is the Constitution we are interpreting, not an insurance clause in small type," that "it is inadmissibly a narrow conception to "disregard the gloss which life has written upon them."" Therefore, empathy and life experiences matter. Since the Constitution is not exhaustive, it leaves judges with lots of room to do what they want!
Reply to this comment
by erb0087 July 13, 2009 4:55 PM EDT
Sonia Sotomayor is NOT a racist.

That is absurd.

"La Raza" refers to the whole human race, blended together.

And anyway, how could she be an Hispanic racist, with a Norwegian first name like "Sonia" ?
Reply to this comment
by TheMasses0009 July 13, 2009 4:52 PM EDT
She's a double-blind rat in a bad experiment.
Reply to this comment
by erb0087 July 13, 2009 4:49 PM EDT
Sotomayor Promises "Fidelity to the Law"
============================

That isn't right.

She shouldn't be showing favoritism to one mutual fund company over the others.

She should put all her Fidelity investments in a blind trust.
Reply to this comment
by TheMasses0009 July 13, 2009 4:52 PM EDT
She's a double-blind rat in a bad experiment.
by erb0087 July 13, 2009 4:45 PM EDT
Lindsey Graham set a good tone of courtesy and civility, despite his differences with Sonia Sotomayor.

He seems like a very good type of Southern Gentleman.
Reply to this comment
by stuart2020 July 13, 2009 4:39 PM EDT
They are just pathetic. I don't know how else to describe the republicKKKans.
Reply to this comment
by South-of-Heaven July 13, 2009 4:37 PM EDT
Yeah Stu,
They are the Party that yells Racist this and Racist that on the way to a Cross Burning.
Reply to this comment
by stuart2020 July 13, 2009 4:39 PM EDT
They are just pathetic. I don't know how else to describe the republicKKKans.
by ffoulkes-2009 July 14, 2009 5:10 AM EDT
Stuart,

Why do you hate Conservatives so much? I am a conservative and a Republican. I have never done anything to you, but you call me names all the time. I do believe you need to know an individual before you call the entire group he belongs to names, don't you?
by stuart2020 July 13, 2009 4:37 PM EDT
Hey! You need a job? FAUX News is hiring biased, racist commentators to help further their agenda at turning America off indefinitely.
Reply to this comment
by stuart2020 July 13, 2009 4:35 PM EDT
The arrogance of these neo-conservative fools never ceases to amaze me. The most racists party ever know to mankimnd is now gonna lecture Democrats on racism!

ROTFLMFAOBTAU!!!!!!!
Reply to this comment
by stuart2020 July 13, 2009 4:32 PM EDT
The GOP are easy wimps. Cowards. Just big fat racists mouths. That's all they are besides being un-American.
Reply to this comment
by South-of-Heaven July 13, 2009 4:31 PM EDT
Nflaguy , dude your Sheet has a stain on it...
Reply to this comment
by quapawsix July 13, 2009 4:18 PM EDT
If she's promising Fidelity then she has to prosecute Dick Cheney, GW Bush, Donald Rumsfeld, and Condalissa Rice for War Crimes against Humanity and Treason against The People of the United States of America.
Reply to this comment
by South-of-Heaven July 13, 2009 4:17 PM EDT
Looks like she is doing really well in defending herself from the GOP.
Reply to this comment
by stuart2020 July 13, 2009 4:32 PM EDT
The GOP are easy wimps. Cowards. Just big fat racists mouths. That's all they are besides being un-American.
by credibility2 July 13, 2009 4:04 PM EDT
Her co-decision against the white and Hispanic firefighters who passed a test, which blacks weren't capable of passing, greatly contradicts this assertion of hers. Fortunately the punitive and racist co-decision was over-turned recently by the Supreme Court. So much for Sotomayor's convenient misrepresentations of the facts.
Reply to this comment
by stuart2020 July 13, 2009 4:37 PM EDT
Hey! You need a job? FAUX News is hiring biased, racist commentators to help further their agenda at turning America off indefinitely.
by quapawsix July 13, 2009 3:52 PM EDT
Well what did you expect now everyone together MOO because to people like her think us poor DUMB A$$ We the People can't Think for ourselves. And of course see in she' a part of that same old politics that goes on in Washington regardless of which party it is they get the GOLD MINE WE GET THE SHAFT.
Reply to this comment
See all 62 Comments

Exclusive Webshow

Mike Huckabee on GOP "rock stars," 2012, health care reform and more. Watch Now

Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: