Comments on: In Senate, When 60 Doesn't Equal 60

AP Analysis: Franken Win, Filibuster-Proof Number Meaningless If Democrats Don't Unite

[hungry1968-15]

by notblue July 1, 2009 8:05 AM PDT
hungry you ever get tired of making it up as you go? Guess not, there was not one bit of truth in your statement. Somehow libs likeyou have been able to convince yourselves that the Dems were absent or in comas when these governemt agencies were established, utter nonsense from the mind that has invented it.







The BIGGEST truth in my statement is that you STILL cannot name ONE positive thing that Bush did for America.

As for the rest of my statement, simply compare the hurricane response between hurricanes Andrew and Katrina. During Andrew, the emergency supplies were driving through 80 MPH winds in the tail of the storm, and during Katrina, "Brownie" didn't even know that there were people in the Superdome, while CNN was SHOWING him the LIVE VIDEO FEED!!!!

[notblue]

hungry, success is perspective and you have none, your biased daily false diatribes are utter nonsense , wht good would it do to point out acomplishments if idiots like you refuse to recognize them? Brainwashed ingrates like you are waste of time, one has to recognize reality to have an intelligent debate, which of course leaves you out.

[jodyrae4]

I hope he changes his snarky condensending attitude. Jerk

[hungry1968-15]

by Joe_NY_15 July 1, 2009 7:12 AM PDT
by johndevinejr July 1, 2009 6:36 AM PDT
Can you name one thing that the Bush Administration did right?
One success?
_____________________

A 10,000 Dow and $1.49/gallon gasoline.....let's see the Spendicrats match that, John






Laughable!!!

You give him credit for the Dow and gas prices when he TOOK office, but ignore the $4 gas prices that existed for a year, $3 gas prices that existed for MOST of his presidency, and the 8,200 Dow average when he left office?!?!



You're such a revisionist!!!

[hungry1968-15]

Since when is it a "constitutional procedure"?

And why in the world do you think that OBSTRUCTING A VOTE, could EVER be more democratic than putting an issue to a majority vote?!?!

You two clowns have heard of VOTING, haven't you?

It's amazing how you guys will SH** all over this country and every principle it was founded on to uphold your destructive neo con policies.

What's next - are you going to scream and cry because I say that lobbying and lobbyists should be outlawed?

[notblue]

hungry you ever get tired of making it up as you go? Guess not, there was not one bit of truth in your statement. Somehow libs likeyou have been able to convince yourselves that the Dems were absent or in comas when these governemt agencies were established, utter nonsense from the mind that has invented it.

[hungry1968-15]

by notblue July 1, 2009 7:03 AM PDT
johndevine, not as amazing as not being able to recognize the fact that it required both sides of the isle to make policy. My statement is the truth yours is selfinduced, brainwashed rationalization. Unfortunately when one is able to ignore truth and fact and hate based on falsehood then tany intelligent debate is not possible.






Translation: "No, I cannot name ONE positive thing that the conservative republicans - particularly Bush - accomplished during their six year reign of failure."


quickly101: Homeland security is the BIGGEST bureaucratic nightmare EVER conceived. It took fully functional agencies, (like FEMA and Border Patrol), and made them completely dysfunctional, while causing their budgets to SOAR through the roof!!

[notblue]

hungry you ever get tired of making it up as you go? Guess not, there was not one bit of truth in your statement. Somehow libs likeyou have been able to convince yourselves that the Dems were absent or in comas when these governemt agencies were established, utter nonsense from the mind that has invented it.

[pubsnomore]

All fabricated numbers that came crumbling down around the house of cards it was built on.

[babooph]

In the US fake democracy,the democrats must sell out to the lobbyists when they are the majority-The Reagan dems put his tax cut for the rich in& later under Bush,when a minority,claimed they could not stop more tax reductions for the rich.

[notblue]

johdevine,your proof that "success" is nothing more than perspective.

[notblue]

hungry, why is it you can't even realize your own words contradict your statement. America had a democracy right up until today, now complete control rests with one party, get it? Guess not!