Comments on: Palin Slapped With Plagiarism Charge
Blogger Says Former V.P. Candidate Paraphrased Newt Gingrich Article For Speech
- Palin is the reason I voted for a Democrat. As long as she is in the Republican party they haven't got a chance at winning. Every time she opened her mouth she proved that she is an idiot *****. I saw her interview with Katie. I'm thinking... you are kidding me. Way to go John. You blew it.
- Reply to this comment
- IQ is no measure of greatness. The fact that republicans do not stay in school perpertually only shows that they are out working. The letter D next to your name seems to show that you are far more likely to be a snob! It also shows that you are lazy and want to take the money of the workers, with force if necessary. Look at Obama's strategy as a 'community leader' to give our wealth away.
- Reply to this comment
- The headline PALIN "SLAPPED" with plagiarism "Charge"
So I am to understand this blogger (who is writing a book on Palin, probably no connection there) is a new SLAP CZAR tasked with "Charging" evil rightwingers for assumed literary indiscretions. I would think anyone remotely associated with Joe (had to drop out of 88 Pres race when caught plagiarizing) Biden would never even mention the P word again. But you libs are nothing if not sanctimoniously hypocritical.
This is your HEADLINE CBS ***??? Not alleged but SLAPPED
And to the rest of you PalinHaters who at the mere mention of her name go all frothing at the mouth rabid. What, other than oppose your candidates, did she really do to engender all of this sexist, racist, republiphobic hatred? Did she cheat on her taxes, or accept a limo as a gift and forget to report it, or say that white males can't think? Was it that she had the temerity to stand up to the establishment Dem/Rep party hacks?
I guess I have to write it all off to "Change you can believe in" and Transparency blah blah blah. - Reply to this comment
- Can you believe that this mediocrity could have been a heartbeat away from the presidency...PLEASE, PLEASE run for president in 2012- nobody can write this stuff.
- Reply to this comment
- "For one thing, the term 'brillians politician' and Ronald Reagan have nothing in common. reagna was nothingm ore than a fear-mongering, arms dealing nitwit who helped to make Iran the pain that it is today. This surreal fear of communism he held was unfathomable, not to mention incorrect. In the late '80's, the Soviet 'empire' imploding. The vale of the ruble was decreasing, and Russian made products were in low demand. Reagan kept the facade of the paper tiger going, in order to keep his base under control."
Posted by TJ411
===============
You're either too young to know what you're talking about, or too lazy to look the facts up. Of course that would explain why it is "unfathomable" to you. - Reply to this comment
- "If Palin is so stupid, corrupt and irrelevant why are so many people getting riled up about her everytime she shows up anywhere?"
Easy. Because we're sick of stupid, corrupt and irrelevant people showing up everywhere.
Posted by voxpopulus at 5:11 PM : Jun 9, 2009
voxpopulus: Even people that YOU think are stupid, corrupt and irrelevant have the right to appear in public! If all of the stupid, coorupt and irrelevant people had to hide at home you'd have to hide at home too! - Reply to this comment
- TO LADYPIRATE2. quit being a parrot. once is enough to prove your an idiot. dont keep repeating the proof. doesnt matter what you believe. once is enough to prove your point.
you are debating yourself fool.
Posted by zwooten727 at 5:50 AM : Jun 10, 2009
I'll repeat anything that I want to repeat and as often as I want to! The constitution gives me the right of freedom of speech just as it does you and just because you don't like what I'm saying and don't agree with me doesn't mean that I'm an idiot or a fool! - Reply to this comment
- You mean the sleazy flight attendent doesn't have original ideas? What a surprise!
- Reply to this comment
- TO LADYPIRATE2. quit being a parrot. once is enough to prove your an idiot. dont keep repeating the proof. doesnt matter what you believe. once is enough to prove your point.
you are debating yourself fool. - Reply to this comment
- Repugs. Please, please, please, run Sarah Palin in 2012.
Posted by voxpopulus at 5:13 PM : Jun 9, 2009
We will if she wants to run! She'll win, too, because if she's at the top of the ticket the RNC won't control her as much as they did when she ran for vice president and you'll have to put up with her as your president!
Also by 2012 she'l be more experienced and she'll be read up on US foreign policy. She will also know what to expect in a presidential campaign and what questions to allow and answer and what not to allow. She will also know what to put a stop to immediately, like the attacks on her family and children.
In short, if she decides to run for the presidency in 2012 she will be prepared. She won't be caught off guard like she was last fall. She will be read up, geared up, and ready for battle! - Reply to this comment
Author Thomas Friedman on Obama's Afghanistan plan and the war on terror.




