Comments on: More Americans Calling Themselves Pro-Life

Gallup Poll: First Time Majority Leaned Pro-Life In 15 Years

[gravyboat45]

All these pro-lifers who vote Republican 99 out of 100 times, believe in limited government that stays out of peoples lives, right? How come they are so FOR the government stepping in and telling a woman what she can or cannot do with her body?
Posted by endrepubs at 6:47 AM : May 16, 2009
*******************************************************

Who's saying the government should tell a woman what to do with her life dumbnut? Its not "her" life its her "baby" life. Besides this is not a case for the government to decide , its a case for the courts.
Posted by BaghdadsHere15

Mornin Baggy.

Oh, by the by, the Govt. puts these cases in the hands of the courts with these little things they make, called laws...Just sayin,

[endrepubs]

Baghdadshere15
It is a simple question. Did you vote for George Bush and did you support his "choice" to invade Iraq and kill thousands of innocent Iraqi's?

[hawksprings]

amartinez377

Guess what honey. It's already happening, so what's the difference.

[amartinez377]

You are coming at it from the 'woman's right to choose.'
We are saying that it's killing an innocent baby.

So who's rights are more important?
Posted by hawksprings at 7:12 AM : May 16, 2009
*****************************************************************************************************

OK by your logic then it is okay for for the "baby" to receive full government benefits if the parents cannot provide it. It only stands to reason that if you "care" for a fetus then you should also care for that "fetus" to have access to health care, food stamps and any other benefit for the "baby" to have a healthy life.

You are ready to do that correct?

[endrepubs]

Baghdadshere15
Did you support GW Bush's "choice" of going into Iraq and killings thousands of innocent Iraqi's? Yes of No!

[hawksprings]

curb_global_warming_now

Because it's killing a baby, that's why.
Whether the baby is in her tummy or in the high chair, it shouldn't be killed by it's mom or anyone else.

[hawksprings]

endrepubs

OK, let me make sure I understand you.
It's morally wrong to kill terrorists, but it's morally ok to kill babies.

Interesting.

[feddupp]

BTW, It is no longer JUST a "woman's body" when someone ELSE gets IN there, as in the case of another HUMAN BEING being carried in her womb!

This is the most ridiculous EXCUSE for killing someone (Yes, an unborn child is SOMEONE!) I've ever heard! This child has separate FINGERPRINTS, HEART, BRAIN, etc., than the woman does! Often, it even is a different GENDER than her!

And, also, this child is one-HALF the FATHER's offspring--whatever happened to HIM??
Used to be the FATHER had to sign to give up the child for ADOPTION, now the woman can have the child KILLED (elective abortion) without the father having any say!

We are sacrificing a person's LIFE for the sake of convenience. An "unwanted" child is STILL a child nonetheless!!

[endrepubs]

hawksprings
I am coming at it from a moral point of view. I bet you voted and supported GW Bush's war of killing Iraqi's. The last time I checked Iraqi's ARE Human. Why does an unborn fetus have more rights than an Iraqi or Muslim?

[hawksprings]

curb_global_warming_now

Instead of killing the one in your torso, why not just kill your 3 year old instead?
I mean, why are you choosing to kill one child over another?