Comments on: Bush Agrees To Obama Bailout Request
Obama Seeks Final $350 Bailout Funds Available For His First Days In Office
Add a Comment See all 318 Comments
- You''''''''''''''''re attempting to make a rational argument to someone who is suffering from a serious mental condition which renders her incapable of distinguishing between Fantasy and Reality.
Posted by stinginrich at 06:36 PM : Jan 12, 2009
ROFL!!! OMG! Slownewsbitch, you''''ve got ALL FIVE of your clunker old computers posting to yourself...
Misha, Stinkingbitch, Slownewsbitch, LwyrsGnsMuny...
This is the most hilarious thing I''''ve ever seen!
Maybe I should go out and get ten or twenty nic names and post support for myself...
But maybe it wouldln''''t be as much fun and blasting all your nic names and your jibber jabber to yourself down the tubes!!!
HILARIOUS! ROFL!
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by TexHillGirl at 06:54 PM : Jan 12, 2009
+ report abuse
See what I mean??? COO-COO, COO-COO....... - Reply to this comment
- PS thanks for the response --- I should have known better than to start. -- There are three good sources to post here generally without referencing her ID sometimes allows refutation in a less hostile manner when she is around.
TITLE 28 PART VI CHAPTER 153 '''' 2241
Munaf v. Geren; Geren v. Omar II
(there is an older version of this that matches Rowdy''''s delusional argument better. but I think the more current date of this is less subject to challenge. It does not hurt that Chief Justice Roberts wrote the majority opinion here either -- when dealing with the conservatives.
Boumediene v. Bush:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by misha128 at 06:46 PM : Jan 12, 2009
+ report abuse
You''re Welcome. I''ve found that even referencing Far Reich Wingnut statements and opinions in support of an argument with Rowdy or any of her cohorts had no effect on their refusal to admit their "misconceptions" of reality. They usually say the Lifelong-Hardliner in question turned into a Sniveling Commie Hippy sometime in the recent past accounting for their present view.....LOL - Reply to this comment
- Bush did something nice for Obama -- started the 15 day clock to access the TARP funds. Even better because the clock will run out on Obama''s watch and we can see this half handled in a competent manner. Unlike the other 1/2 administered by Bush and Paulson that according to the Administration''s IG is currently in disarray.
- Reply to this comment
- You''''''''re attempting to make a rational argument to someone who is suffering from a serious mental condition which renders her incapable of distinguishing between Fantasy and Reality.
Posted by stinginrich at 06:36 PM : Jan 12, 2009
No I am making an argument to the rest of the posters here; I am well aware Tex is unable to grasp reality.
Posted by misha128 at 06:39 PM : Jan 12, 2009
PS thanks for the response --- I should have known better than to start. -- There are three good sources to post here generally without referencing her ID sometimes allows refutation in a less hostile manner when she is around.
TITLE 28 PART VI CHAPTER 153 '' 2241
Munaf v. Geren; Geren v. Omar II
(there is an older version of this that matches Rowdy''s delusional argument better. but I think the more current date of this is less subject to challenge. It does not hurt that Chief Justice Roberts wrote the majority opinion here either -- when dealing with the conservatives.
Boumediene v. Bush: - Reply to this comment
- You''''re attempting to make a rational argument to someone who is suffering from a serious mental condition which renders her incapable of distinguishing between Fantasy and Reality.
Posted by stinginrich at 06:36 PM : Jan 12, 2009
No I am making an argument to the rest of the posters here; I am well aware Tex is unable to grasp reality. - Reply to this comment
- one last point of reference US Statute
TITLE 28 PART VI CHAPTER 153 ' 2241
Lists the requirements for the granting of a Habeas Writ in the US -- in the requirements there is the requirement to be a prisoner but no reference at all to citizenship (US or otherwise of the prisoner being detained) - Reply to this comment
- Recent case where US citizen has habeas from overseas -- no lie facts ROWDY
Munaf v. Geren; Geren v. Omar II
Bill Long 6/18/08
SUMMARY OF JUNE 12, 2008 DECISION
This complex case has to do with the jurisidiction of American Courts over American citizens captured by the Multi-National Force (MNF) in Iraq since the American invasion of Iraq in 2003 and being held for trial in the Iraqi court system. The Supreme Court delivered a two-part decision in this case: (1) By a 9-0 margin, the Court decided that US Courts do have habeas corpus jurisdiction over American citizens held in circumstances so defined (where American soldiers are the de-facto captors and guards of the Americans), and (2) also unanimously, concluded that the American courts'''' habeas jurisdiction doesn''''t reach the claims made by the petitioners in this case--to prevent transfer of the American citizens to Iraqi custody and trial. This review will present some of the facts of the cases as well as the leading points of Chief Justice Roberts'''' opinion.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by misha128 at 06:17 PM : Jan 12, 2009
+ report abuse
You''re attempting to make a rational argument to someone who is suffering from a serious mental condition which renders her incapable of distinguishing between Fantasy and Reality. - Reply to this comment
- I believe the article is about expanding the bailout rather than personal issues.
The interesting part of this is Obama has already done more to help our economy in the last month than Bush has done in 8 years. He has accomplished this simply by realizing that there is a recession and not running from it like Bush did. - Reply to this comment
- Another recent case
Boumediene v. Bush:
Guantanamo Detainees%u2019 Right to Habeas Corpus
Summary
In the consolidated cases of Boumediene v. Bush and Al Odah v. United States,
decided June 12, 2008, the Supreme Court held in a 5-4 opinion that aliens
designated as enemy combatants and detained at the U.S. Naval Station in
Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, have the constitutional privilege of habeas corpus. The
Court also found that '' 7 of the Military Commissions Act (MCA), which limited
judicial review of executive determinations of the petitioners%u2019 enemy combatant
status, DID NOT PROVIDE AN ADEQUATE habeas substitute and therefore acted as an
unconstitutional suspension of the writ of habeas.
Where is your proof -- here is mine -- US Citizen has Habeas from outside the US (Prior post - the ruling you are misinterpreting) This posts says the MCA is not an adequate substitute -- nothing posted in either of my posts confirms the need for an alternate procedure for foreigners -- if you want to "prove that up" in your preferred vocabulary YOU NEED TO CITE A VERIFIABLE SOURCE - Reply to this comment
- Recent case where US citizen has habeas from overseas -- no lie facts ROWDY
Munaf v. Geren; Geren v. Omar II
Bill Long 6/18/08
SUMMARY OF JUNE 12, 2008 DECISION
This complex case has to do with the jurisidiction of American Courts over American citizens captured by the Multi-National Force (MNF) in Iraq since the American invasion of Iraq in 2003 and being held for trial in the Iraqi court system. The Supreme Court delivered a two-part decision in this case: (1) By a 9-0 margin, the Court decided that US Courts do have habeas corpus jurisdiction over American citizens held in circumstances so defined (where American soldiers are the de-facto captors and guards of the Americans), and (2) also unanimously, concluded that the American courts'' habeas jurisdiction doesn''t reach the claims made by the petitioners in this case--to prevent transfer of the American citizens to Iraqi custody and trial. This review will present some of the facts of the cases as well as the leading points of Chief Justice Roberts'' opinion. - Reply to this comment
Posted by stinginrich at 06:12 PM : Jan 12, 2009
Oh now you switched to Stinkinbithch instead...
Ho hum...there must be some addults somewhere on this board.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by TexHillGirl at 06:13 PM : Jan 12, 2009
+ report abuse
EVERYONE knows you have a Serious Mental Problem Rowdy. How does that make you feel???- Reply to this comment
And you''''re the one that posted the finding in the case that proved up exactly what I said...
And yet you keep arguing because you pissed off that you did it.
Get a life, pea brain...your lack of intellect IS NOT MY PROBLEM.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by TexHillGirl at 06:10 PM : Jan 12, 2009
+ report abuse
Take your Meds and ****, Fatazz....LMMFAO- Reply to this comment
- Posted by TexHillGirl at 06:02 PM : Jan 12, 2009
I found the case law that Rowdy''''''''''''''''s lie misinterprets. In a special circumstance a US Citizen (or possibly a Brit) can petition a US court for Habeas relief when they are being held nominally by a US authority OUTSIDE OF THE UNITED STATES. This restriction has nothing to do with people on US SOIL be the citizens or otherwise. The source of the lie is now exposed. a crackpot theory based on the misapplication of an existing case.
Posted by misha128 at 06:02 PM : Jan 12, 2009
You have posted no proof and I have found the law you have made a crackpot interpretation of your choice -- definitive source or just another lie --
----------------------------------
----------------------------------------
------
Posted by misha128 at 06:04 PM : Jan 12, 2009
Droooooool, drip, drooooool, drip, schleeeeeeeep, droool drip, drooooooo!
Misha it''''s your problem, not mine...want me to send you a bib or something?
Not playing your stupid games anymore...you know not about that of which you speak.
Posted by TexHillGirl at 06:05 PM : Jan 12, 2009
Thanks so much -- lie conceded no proof offered and your story refuted with case law -- have a nice evening liar. Good Nite. - Reply to this comment
- Posted by TexHillGirl at 06:02 PM : Jan 12, 2009
I found the case law that Rowdy''''s lie misinterprets. In a special circumstance a US Citizen (or possibly a Brit) can petition a US court for Habeas relief when they are being held nominally by a US authority OUTSIDE OF THE UNITED STATES. This restriction has nothing to do with people on US SOIL be the citizens or otherwise. The source of the lie is now exposed. a crackpot theory based on the misapplication of an existing case.
Posted by misha128 at 06:02 PM : Jan 12, 2009
You have posted no proof and I have found the law you have made a crackpot interpretation of your choice -- definitive source or just another lie -- - Reply to this comment
- I found the case law that Rowdy''s lie misinterprets. In a special circumstance a US Citizen (or possibly a Brit) can petition a US court for Habeas relief when they are being held nominally by a US authority OUTSIDE OF THE UNITED STATES. This restriction has nothing to do with people on US SOIL be the citizens or otherwise. The source of the lie is now exposed. a crackpot theory based on the misapplication of an existing case.
- Reply to this comment
- you''''ve had a 1/2 an hour -- no proof -- no source -- Rowdy the perpetual lying machine has cranked out yet another serial lie.
Posted by misha128 at 05:32 PM : Jan 12, 2009
Rowdy enters the CBS site and says "Hi. My name is Rowdy and I''m a habitual liar"
the room replies "Hi Rowdy!" - Reply to this comment
- Obama wants more money? That will be a constant theme for the next 4 years. Socialists can never get enought money.
- Reply to this comment
- Posted by Bushtarded at 05:34 PM : Jan 12, 2009
We are all waiting for Bushtarded to stop abusing this blog with his repeated entries. - Reply to this comment
- Well those are the documents I am looking at, those are the documents Misha posted that SAID:
YOU MUST PROVIDE A SUBSTITUTE VENUE TO BRING THIS CASE TO THE US COURTS.
Posted by TexHillGirl at 05:26 PM : Jan 12, 2009
You lack the comprehension capability of an average primary school student
DID NOT PROVIDE AN ADEQUATE habeas substitute and therefore acted as an
unconstitutional suspension of the writ of habeas.
NEIThERS SAYS OR IMPLIES IN ANY WAY
this lie you continue to post -- the Parhat case says thrice repeated statements are not true -- furthermore as you are the author of all statements cited -- the decision further stated they are not even proven to be three independent statements.
you''ve had a 1/2 an hour -- no proof -- no source -- Rowdy the perpetual lying machine has cranked out yet another serial lie. - Reply to this comment
- I''m still trying to figure if Obama is coming or going? Does he even know? Better sell these Obama coins and the Obama post card and piggy bank.Opps, got to get my "change" outa that piggy bank first. Any bidders?
- Reply to this comment
