Comments on: Caroline Kennedy May Seek N.Y. Senate Seat

Kennedy Has Talked To Gov. David Paterson About Replacing Sen. Hillary Clinton

Add a Comment See all 49 Comments
by indivthinker December 6, 2008 2:29 PM EST
New York could do a whole lot worse.

Posted by godofredo29 at 11:25 AM : Dec 06, 2008

Not really. Replacing a horrible Clinton with an even worse Kennedy is impossible to beat... except with a Bush, but there aren''t any Bushs up North.
Reply to this comment
by drpolitics1 December 6, 2008 2:29 PM EST
The news of Caroline Kennedy taking Clinton''s senate seat is just disgusting. What a game the Democrats have created to get the Kennedy%u2019s back in office.

While I respect the legacy of the Kennedy''s to America, I still think we must remember that Caroline and her rich family owe their success and riches to the "bootleg" illegal liquor business her grandfather started. All our families would be rich and powerful if we participated in illegal business%u2019s the way this family started.

I do not think she should get the Senate seat.
Reply to this comment
by godofredo29 December 6, 2008 2:25 PM EST
New York could do a whole lot worse.
Reply to this comment
by indivthinker December 6, 2008 2:19 PM EST
"Caroline Kennedy will run for president in 2012."

Probably, it just wouldn''t be an election without a Bush, Kennedy, or Clinton running for President or Vice President.

1980 - Ted Kennedy ran President, Bush Sr. for Vice.
1984 - Bush Sr. for Vice.
1988 - Bush Sr. for President.
1992 - Bush Sr. for President, Bill for President.
1996 - Bill for President
2000 - W Bush for President
2004 - W Bush for President
2008 - Hillary for President
2012 - Hillary, Caroline Kennedy, and/or Jeb Bush for President or Vice.

We just can''t seem to get rid of these people. Perhaps another storming of the Bastille will finally get rid of these morons. Personally, I just think we should exile them all to Australia.
Reply to this comment
by indivthinker December 6, 2008 2:10 PM EST
No more Bushs. No more Kennedys. No more Clintons.
No more corrupt dynasties!
Reply to this comment
by sandy19731 December 6, 2008 2:06 PM EST
The question NO DEMOCRAT WILL ANSWER:

Have you EVER blamed ANY Democrat for ANYTHING? EVEN ONCE???

Posted by txgrouch2007 at 10:19 AM : Dec 06, 2008
Actually yes. Why do you think the democratic congress is so unpopular? But, do not worry, we are working on it. Thank you for asking.
Reply to this comment
by txgrouch2007 December 6, 2008 1:19 PM EST
The question NO DEMOCRAT WILL ANSWER:

Have you EVER blamed ANY Democrat for ANYTHING? EVEN ONCE???
Reply to this comment
by txgrouch2007 December 6, 2008 1:05 PM EST
Is this what the ignorant voters want?
Posted by JackP32 at 09:50 AM : Dec 06, 2008

Yes. Now what are YOU going to do about it?

BTW, did you hear any news from Thailand recently?
Reply to this comment
by txgrouch2007 December 6, 2008 1:04 PM EST
At the very least the Democrats have 58 seats in the Senate
Posted by fsw3 at 09:32 AM : Dec 06, 2008

Oh, really. So that leaves 42 Republicans.

You can hardly say that the people threw out the Republicans when almost half of both houses of Congress are still Republican.

So, it all sounds like typical Democrat gloating, boasting, and GROSS exaggeration to pretend the Democrats won some kind of overwhelming victory.

It''s just the normal pendulum swings of power. After two or four years of absolute power for the Democrats, it will be intersting to see how fast the pendulum is swinging the other way by then.

Reply to this comment
by txgrouch2007 December 6, 2008 1:01 PM EST
I hear very little whining about Reagan.
Posted by fsw3 at 09:24 AM : Dec 06, 2008

LOL! Then you don''t spend much time in these discssions.

Come back when you''re INFORMED.
Reply to this comment
See all 49 Comments
  • MOST POPULAR
Discussed
  1. Tempers Flare In Climate Change Flap

    (714 recent comments)

Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: