Comments on: Caroline Kennedy May Seek N.Y. Senate Seat
Kennedy Has Talked To Gov. David Paterson About Replacing Sen. Hillary Clinton
- New York could do a whole lot worse.
Posted by godofredo29 at 11:25 AM : Dec 06, 2008
Not really. Replacing a horrible Clinton with an even worse Kennedy is impossible to beat... except with a Bush, but there aren''t any Bushs up North. - Reply to this comment
- The news of Caroline Kennedy taking Clinton''s senate seat is just disgusting. What a game the Democrats have created to get the Kennedy%u2019s back in office.
While I respect the legacy of the Kennedy''s to America, I still think we must remember that Caroline and her rich family owe their success and riches to the "bootleg" illegal liquor business her grandfather started. All our families would be rich and powerful if we participated in illegal business%u2019s the way this family started.
I do not think she should get the Senate seat. - Reply to this comment
- New York could do a whole lot worse.
- Reply to this comment
- "Caroline Kennedy will run for president in 2012."
Probably, it just wouldn''t be an election without a Bush, Kennedy, or Clinton running for President or Vice President.
1980 - Ted Kennedy ran President, Bush Sr. for Vice.
1984 - Bush Sr. for Vice.
1988 - Bush Sr. for President.
1992 - Bush Sr. for President, Bill for President.
1996 - Bill for President
2000 - W Bush for President
2004 - W Bush for President
2008 - Hillary for President
2012 - Hillary, Caroline Kennedy, and/or Jeb Bush for President or Vice.
We just can''t seem to get rid of these people. Perhaps another storming of the Bastille will finally get rid of these morons. Personally, I just think we should exile them all to Australia. - Reply to this comment
- No more Bushs. No more Kennedys. No more Clintons.
No more corrupt dynasties! - Reply to this comment
- The question NO DEMOCRAT WILL ANSWER:
Have you EVER blamed ANY Democrat for ANYTHING? EVEN ONCE???
Posted by txgrouch2007 at 10:19 AM : Dec 06, 2008
Actually yes. Why do you think the democratic congress is so unpopular? But, do not worry, we are working on it. Thank you for asking. - Reply to this comment
- The question NO DEMOCRAT WILL ANSWER:
Have you EVER blamed ANY Democrat for ANYTHING? EVEN ONCE??? - Reply to this comment
- Is this what the ignorant voters want?
Posted by JackP32 at 09:50 AM : Dec 06, 2008
Yes. Now what are YOU going to do about it?
BTW, did you hear any news from Thailand recently? - Reply to this comment
- At the very least the Democrats have 58 seats in the Senate
Posted by fsw3 at 09:32 AM : Dec 06, 2008
Oh, really. So that leaves 42 Republicans.
You can hardly say that the people threw out the Republicans when almost half of both houses of Congress are still Republican.
So, it all sounds like typical Democrat gloating, boasting, and GROSS exaggeration to pretend the Democrats won some kind of overwhelming victory.
It''s just the normal pendulum swings of power. After two or four years of absolute power for the Democrats, it will be intersting to see how fast the pendulum is swinging the other way by then. - Reply to this comment
- I hear very little whining about Reagan.
Posted by fsw3 at 09:24 AM : Dec 06, 2008
LOL! Then you don''t spend much time in these discssions.
Come back when you''re INFORMED. - Reply to this comment
- Oh no! Not another liberal Kennedy weenie about to gain power in the Senate. Why don''t we just turn the management of our country over to the Bushs, Kennedys, and Clintons and get it over with and cut out the charade. Is this what the ignorant voters want?
- Reply to this comment
- Wow! Kennedys, Bushes, Clintons! Senatorial seats and the presidency get handed down from families to families, While the rest of the world gets away from that sort of third world nepotism, this country flocks to it.
It''s really sad to watch. - Reply to this comment
- You haven''''t stopped whining about Bill Clinton for close to 20 years now! Most of you foam at the mouth when you speak his name.
Posted by grumpas at 09:12 AM : Dec 06, 2008
I keep reading about Democrats "whining" about Reagan. A bunch of liberals just made a new movie about Nixon, and director Ron Howard decried the "abuse of power." I didn''t hear him decrying Clinton''s abuse of power.
But they''re still "whining" about Nixon.
And you "whine" about us bringing up Clinton.
More hate and lies from a Democrat.
Have you EVER blamed ANY Democrat for ANYTHING? EVEN ONCE??? - Reply to this comment
- You enjoy being hateful and bitter. Your guys lost the election and for some pretty good reasons. Posted by fsw3 at 09:10 AM : Dec 06, 2008
So do Democrats have a 2/3 majority in Congress? In EITHER house???
More hate and lies from a Democrat. - Reply to this comment
- Do Democrats EVER stop hating and lying?
Posted by txgrouch2007
No!!! We learned how to from you right wing Republican lunatics. You haven''t stopped whining about Bill Clinton for close to 20 years now! Most of you foam at the mouth when you speak his name. - Reply to this comment
- And when do you stop hating and lying?
Posted by fsw3 at 08:52 AM : Dec 06, 2008
It took you FOUR MINUTES to come up with that one? LOL! - Reply to this comment
- neocons have made a point of using division for political gain.
Posted by fsw3 at 08:48 AM : Dec 06, 2008
Who said "Bush is Hitler?" - Reply to this comment
- Excellent choice. It will drive the neocons/republicans insane. Any sane choice does.
Posted by Centerfall94 at 10:58 PM : Dec 05, 2008
Do Democrats EVER stop hating and lying? - Reply to this comment
- Historically 1/3 of the people who posed a problem for the Clintons died in plane crashes, another 1/3 by suicide, and the other 1/3 by unsolved murder. Posted by orgone at 04:19 AM : Dec 06, 2008
LOL! Kennedys don''t count. They cause their OWN "accidents."
But yes, ANYTHING to make sure Hillary can''t try to win the seat back when she''s finished as Sec''y of State.
Yes, Joe Kennedy was a gangster and a crook, as well as an FDR crony (ambassador to England, first head of the SEC). But Caroline was just a little girl when Joe died, so little if any of his gansterism rubbed off on her.
She might be a good way to help our country move on from the disgraceful "twenty aught" decade. And the "roaring nineties" before it. - Reply to this comment
- WHEN WILL THE WRONGFUL AND CORRUPT KENNEDY MONARCHY END?
It''s been a long time since the late 50''s and 1960''s that we, the American public, were misled and became enamored with the Kennedy role-models who we perceived as our gods.
Then came the of rumors and prima facie evidence, that these same Kennedys were plenty spoiled, selfish, vain, corrupt, and unlawful high-society druggies, as well as very probable pimps and murderers.
More Kennedys leading us? No thanks! - Reply to this comment
Mike Huckabee on GOP "rock stars," 2012, health care reform and more.




