Comments on: AP: Obama Unlikely To Seek Torture Charges

Advisers Tell AP He'll Set Up Panel To Probe Interrogations, But Criminal Charges Unlikely

Add a Comment See all 136 Comments
by used2bfedup1 November 18, 2008 2:34 PM EST
lol Masses and Rowdy

2 lines and i got ya toooooo easy.
Reply to this comment
by takebackusa November 18, 2008 2:33 PM EST
tj - don''t bother responding to Rowdy. She''s on here every day, all day cutting and pasting the same old stuff over and over. Doesn''t matter what the topic is, she just repeats the same stuff. You''ll even see her respond to her own posts. Now that is really funny ! Most people on this board just laugh at her rants and ignore her.
Reply to this comment
by guyfrompa49 November 18, 2008 2:30 PM EST
used2bfedup1- And 4 more coming up...
Reply to this comment
by used2bfedup1 November 18, 2008 2:29 PM EST
Ol Obama looks more presidential than Bush and he hasnt even been president yet.

We''ve had it bad for 8 long years.
Reply to this comment
by bks59 November 18, 2008 2:23 PM EST
pelosi blew when she decalared "impeachment is off the table"
Reply to this comment
by guyfrompa49 November 18, 2008 2:16 PM EST
Rowdydfw - Great post
Reply to this comment
by patriot_tx1 November 18, 2008 2:15 PM EST
cause_y a sheep eating muslim in Scotland? LOL Hope he gives me his address. I''d love to send him some nice juicy pork chops! How about it cause_y??? I''ve got a nice BIG HAM for you too. LOL
Reply to this comment
by anonbychoice November 18, 2008 2:14 PM EST
AWWW...the liddle baby mad! Do you need a ba-ba?


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by tj217 at 11:12 AM : Nov 18, 2008
So is tj also cause_y? I don''t remember anyone picking on tj, but I could be wrong....it wouldn''t be the first time, and I''m sure it won''t be the last.
Reply to this comment
by patriot_tx1 November 18, 2008 2:09 PM EST
cause_y ----- Texas isn''t a swamp. Just shows that you have no idea what your talking about. Some ignorant monkey from another country. Here''s your banana now go away and swing from some trees while scratching your flees.
Reply to this comment
by guyfrompa49 November 18, 2008 2:08 PM EST
cause_y - You''re an angry little man.. Did you not get your milk and cookies today?
Reply to this comment
by patriot_tx1 November 18, 2008 2:07 PM EST
cause_y ---- Don''t be counting on any U.S. money in your pocket just yet.
Reply to this comment
by tiger8055 November 18, 2008 2:01 PM EST
I keep hearing about torture, but the only thing this article mentions is the three people who were waterboarded. Who else was a victim? From everything one hears in the media, one would think there were thousands of American citizens rounded up and sent to torture camps. If it was just these three foreign terrorist thugs, I don''t think average Americans will even care. Any trial would get a lot of publicity and there certainly would be absolutely no sympathy for these three in flyover country. This would seriously hurt OBama and make him look like a total pansy. Here''s the real deal about torture: it just doesn''t happen, at least not to people captured by Americans. Sure, there was Abu Ghraib, but I think that was more humiliation than torture and it was a huge exception to the rule. Including Gulf War I, we''ve taken over a hundred thousand POWs. These people have been fed, clothed, deloused, and given top-notch medical treatment. Almost all of them were released within a few months and in far better shape than when they were captured. This torture thing is a big non-issue. The people who are making this an issue, while ignoring the real ***-pounding civil rights abuses in other countries of the world, are far-Left America-hating Libs like Bill Ayers. Obama shouldn''t touch this tar baby with a ten foot pole.
Reply to this comment
by anonbychoice November 18, 2008 2:00 PM EST
Your stupidity, ignorance and lack of maturity are so pathetic they don''''t even warrant a response from me. How immature.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by tj217 at 10:50 AM : Nov 18, 2008

Then why give one?? ALL politicians are the same. Promise the moon to get into office, then look at you and say "I''m sorry did I say the moon? No I said no such thing!"
Blobama is the same, and his change is choosing some of the Bill(getting a job instead of doing his job)Clinton''s old administration. That''s NOT change, but I''ll be here with the "told you so" dance, when you see he''s just as full of hot air as the rest of them!!
Reply to this comment
by patriot_tx1 November 18, 2008 1:57 PM EST
calling colon Bowel and the clintons liars ? *** right I''''m calling those fvcking low life piecse of sewer trash liars

cause_y

Then where are you coming from??? Your Obama has picked a Clinton Cabinet.
Reply to this comment
by abbe91 November 18, 2008 1:56 PM EST
Or was it different back then?
Posted by Questionnews at 10:52 AM : Nov 18, 2008

Back then there was a trial at Nuremberg, if I recall.
Japanese prison-camp officers and guards were convicted of torture for waterboarding pow''s.
Reply to this comment
by patriot_tx1 November 18, 2008 1:55 PM EST
cause_y ---- You make Obama very proud. Now go take another hit off your crackpipe. That''s all you have and ever will have loser!
Reply to this comment
by oldguy4truth November 18, 2008 1:54 PM EST
Bush had no idea that he oked torture. Cheney han that one by poor old W, like the Invasion Of Iraq. Let Bush sail off in the sunset.. Cheney will meet his maker soon, so let''s move on. 1st, re-instate the Geneva Convention, and regain some lost respect from the world.
Reply to this comment
by questionnews November 18, 2008 1:52 PM EST
I know some really nasty things happened in WWII. Things that would have appalled people far beyond waterboarding or anything we have heard of coming out of the Iraq & Afgan wars. We''re talking wholesale slaughter of villages & the brutal torture & killings of captured enemies. (National Geographic WWII special) You have to ask if FDR & Truman should have been charged with war crimes for their complicity. Or was it different back then?
Reply to this comment
by patriot_tx1 November 18, 2008 1:52 PM EST
yo cletus - and just because a retarded baboon from TexASS called GW Bush claims that buybeee jaysooos told him that Iraq had thousands of tonnes of WMD in MArch 2003, doesn''''t make that factual

Posted by cause_y

So your calling Colin Powell a liar and all of congress including the Clintons liars too? LOL
Reply to this comment
by cbs_oliver November 18, 2008 1:50 PM EST
"Pre-emptive pardons would be highly controversial, but former White House counsel Arthur B. Culvahouse Jr. said it would protect those who were following orders or otherwise trying to protect the nation."

Golly!

The Republican legal wisdom is that the President and his croneys can steal all the jewelry and torture and kill a bunch of innocent people and then give himself and his croneys a pardon in advance.

What could motivate such insane legal interpretations?
Reply to this comment
See all 136 Comments

Exclusive Webshow

Mike Huckabee on GOP "rock stars," 2012, health care reform and more. Watch Now

Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: