Comments on: McCain Unveils Tough New Rhetoric
Republican Presidential Nominee Vows To Fight For New Direction As Polls Show Him Behind Obama
- When Obama sits back and watches Israel.I told you so...
Posted by mr22585 at 11:58 AM : Oct 13, 2008
Uh Huh?! Sparky there is little doubt that the Congress of this nation, regardless of Party, will make sure funds are available to defend our Ally, always has been for all the rest! There''s also, no reason to believe that OBAMA, as all Democrats all the way back to Truman, will be a good ally TO Isreal. He just will approach the Arab Countries differently than the Far Reich has under Bush/McSame. - Reply to this comment
- "We''re going to spend a lot of time and after I whip his you-know-what in this debate, we''re going to be going out 24/7," McCain said of Democratic rival Barack Obama.
McCain has lost himself - Reply to this comment
- This TIRED Old Man will say or do whatever it takes to win.... WHO knows WERE he''ll be IF he''s elected on ANYTHING. When he stepped to the mike as our economy slipped off the cliff and said the Fundamentals of the Economy are fine and less than a few hows later told me that for the FIRST TIME in our HISTORY the Fundamentals meant, the Working People... you know the people who''s standard of living has gone down hill since 2000? Well WE were the Fundamentals and ONLY our ability to Work. When you are watching a job loss in excess of 100,000 and you''ve already seen MILLIONS leave before them? Well I''d say he''s just as much out of touch as a man can get.
- Reply to this comment
- "My friends, we''ve got them just where we want them," McCain planned to tell supporters, according to speech excerpts provided by the campaign.
LMFAO!
Denial or stupidity or bravado? You decide. - Reply to this comment
- Posted by Colt8881
Not sure about Shannon being mudrose. Mudrose might have been horribly misguided but she was usually much more eloquent than Shannon''s ever been. - Reply to this comment
- All he''s doing is changing the pig''s lipstick.
- Reply to this comment





