Comments on: Clinton's Final Shining Moment
CBSNews.com Analysis: Former Obama Adversary Delivers On Show Of Democratic Unity
Add a Comment See all 709 Comments
- Posted by libra127 at 04:24 PM
Bye, You''re a brainwashed liberal, you should look at yourself more closely and learn more about military issues if you want to discuss them.....sorry we smashed terrorists around the globe, maybe a woman would have allowed 9/11 part 2,3,4 and waited for 5 instead of giving the terrorists a cowboy wooping
Remember, thank god, no terrorists attacks on America since 9/11, 7 years....great job Bush - Reply to this comment
- An overwhelming majority of people in this country think that our invasion of Iraq was a huge mistake, predicated as it was on the LIE that Iraq had WMD.
Posted by libra127
Saddam Huessin did have WMD and he used them to kill over 50,000 of his own people. He was practicing to use them elsewhere. When the inspectors got there to find out about the weapons, there were none because they had been moved to Syria. Saddam Huessin was a Ruthless dictator.
Whether or not we should have taken him out ourselves, is another matter for debate. If were going to take out all Ruthless dictators, we would be at war in most of Africa and most of Asia. - Reply to this comment
- BLKPRES,
Since you continue to demean women in general and HRC in particular -- after nearly a day''s worth of discussion -- I''m outta here for now. But I''ll be back to try to educate you about your shameful attitudes toward women if you start to expound them again so virulently as you have today. Please -- take an honest look at yourself. It would do us all good. Bye. - Reply to this comment
- Libra127,
See you still trying to cross my signals again about you not being an attorney with your continued psychoanalysis about my so-called sexist issues. It''s okay if you really are a Ph.D level professor at a leading law school, but please don''t insult my intelligence and pretend that a caring, considerate, sensitive psychologist can twist and turn my words inside out and upside down. As far as my reference to "lil" Hillary goes, the connotation carries terms of endearment--not belittlement. Afterall, she seems so sad after having to come to terms with being steamrolled by the Obama Shuffle. Sorry ''bout her lil'' pipe dream. - Reply to this comment
- Posted by libra127 at 04:06 PM
again, you''re whole comment is false and based on incorrect facts, the Iraq invasion was about Regime change and WMD''s was only 1 factor, and secondly it is incorrect, we didn''t "go it alone" there were United Kingdom, Italy, Poland, and other countries involved in the invasion....I can''t even begin to start with you''re incorrect liberal mis-information - Reply to this comment
McCain has said he wants to extend the Bush tax cuts for the rich. He has also claimed that the economy is basically fine and has admitted that he really doesn''''t understand economics. He has said he is fine with extending the Iraq war. He is unconcerned about extending health care insurance to the uninsured. He has been disrespectful to his wife in public ("***") and did not treat his 1st wife well. He wants to select SC justices that will overturn Roe vs Wade. He has made numerous gaffes that indicate he is either unknowledgable about important issues (Sunni vs. *****, for ex.) or senile or both. I think he is too old to be President.
Posted by libra127 at 03:56 PM
Everything you stated above is totally false and ficticious....I don''t know where to start, these are all liberal talking points- Reply to this comment
- With lil'' Hillary, terrorist know they will be coddled and pat on the head and given a baked brownie
Posted by BLKPRESIDENT at 04:08 PM : Aug 27, 2008
How WRONG you are! A woman can issue a command to "bomb the terrorist camps" just as easily as a man can. A woman can conjure up a policy to invade a country just as well as a man can.
If our country''s defense depends on terrorists cowering and coming around just because a MAN is in charge -- well...it ain''t gonna happen. Men have been in charge during EVERY terrorist attack that has happened. Somehow, terrorists weren''t detered by that. - Reply to this comment
- Libra127,
Given your comments about a woman leader possibly being reluctant to go to war in Iraq, please consider that where she wouldn''t have your so-called "cowboy" mentality to go it alone, SHE may have also subjected her fellow countrymen to further terrorist attacks in an unpredictable world. Women are out in matters of war, it''s really that simple. Coddling the terrorist only leads to our own destruction. Sorry about lil'' Hillary''s pipe dream. - Reply to this comment
- Girls like lil'' Hillary simply would been in over the heads as Commander-in-Chief. We are not talking about hosting an Avon party here.
Posted by BLKPRESIDENT at 04:02 PM : Aug 27, 2008
The problem is that you keep using allusions to hosting parties, baking brownies, and running vacuum cleaners -- as if those were the only actions women are capable of. Furthermore, you constantly refer to Sen. Clinton as "lil" or "girl". THIS IS DEMEANING TO HILLARY AND TO ALL WOMEN !!!
It''s fine if you don''t support HRC for Pres. or VP. Just cut the _crap_ about your demeaning, stereotypical views of woman. You sound like a fool. - Reply to this comment
- sbbm,
What a great credit to good woman everywhere. Your husband should be proud to have a partner like you.
Obama-L.Douglas Wilder ''08, REAL CHANGE we can believe in. - Reply to this comment
- Libra127,
You wrote that terrorist aren''t necessarily afraid of President Bush and that they could care less about who is in charge; well, let me make it crystal clear to you and anyon else that believes terrorist don''t act any diffrently given who as Commander-in-Chief they will have to deal with. With lil'' Hillary, terrorist know they will be coddled and pat on the head and given a baked brownie when they pretend to be on their best behavior; however, with Mr. Bush or Mr. Obama terrorist know within the soles of their feet one simple thing, pardon my language in advance, Libra127, because you deserve civility, "Don''t even F&^$%ing think about it" is the theme that rings continuely within their circles when they think of tangling with a strong man. - Reply to this comment
- An overwhelming majority of people in this country think that our invasion of Iraq was a huge mistake, predicated as it was on the LIE that Iraq had WMD. Perhaps a woman leader, with her "kinder, gentler nature" would be more likely to pursue alternatives to unprevoked invasions of other countries. A woman leader would be more inclined to seek consensus with our allies rather than to "go it alone" in cowboy fashion. Hating war might be a very good thing. If you''re going to use gender stereotypes, they cut both ways.
- Reply to this comment
- Minuteman-5,
In response to your question about whether or not women military commanders are worthy of their service, Yes, of course, but that doesn''t make them presidential material/Commander-in-Chief. When you put an apple in the basket upon your kitchen table with oranges, that doesn''t make the apple an orange. Girls like lil'' Hillary simply would been in over the heads as Commander-in-Chief. We are not talking about hosting an Avon party here. - Reply to this comment
- Libra127,
In response to why you don''t seem to think having women friends doesn''t make one sexist, consider this, Do you have friends within your circles that you don''t like? Of course, NOT! So, when I actually engage in friendships with women that means I DO like and respect them, but I know within my heart of hearts they aren''t Commander-in-Chief material. YOU really just have such a high opinion of lil'' Hillary but one day you will realize she ain''t no Dwight David Eisenhower. - Reply to this comment
- Well thank you for your compliment, most Conservatives/Republican are reasonable, and to think they are not, is a stereotype that democrat liberals have about us, as an opposition party
Posted by Minuteman-5 at 03:50 PM : Aug 27, 2008
I confined my comment to those conservative Republicans I have observed on these boards. It''s not a group to be proud of. (Actually, most of the liberals do not inspire admiration either). I consider myself to be an Independent. - Reply to this comment
- you are comparing legislation votes with presidential decisions which are totally different
Posted by Minuteman-5 at 03:44 PM : Aug 27, 2008
McCain has said he wants to extend the Bush tax cuts for the rich. He has also claimed that the economy is basically fine and has admitted that he really doesn''t understand economics. He has said he is fine with extending the Iraq war. He is unconcerned about extending health care insurance to the uninsured. He has been disrespectful to his wife in public ("***") and did not treat his 1st wife well. He wants to select SC justices that will overturn Roe vs Wade. He has made numerous gaffes that indicate he is either unknowledgable about important issues (Sunni vs. *****, for ex.) or senile or both. I think he is too old to be President.
Those are the main reasons I will not vote for McCain. - Reply to this comment
- Posted by sbbm at 03:53 PM
Very well put, you are a fine woman and you''re husband is a lucky man - Reply to this comment
- You seem quite rational and reasonable for a conservative Republican on these boards. Kudos to you.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by libra127 at 03:29 PM
Well thank you for your compliment, most Conservatives/Republican are reasonable, and to think they are not, is a stereotype that democrat liberals have about us, as an opposition party - Reply to this comment
- Posted by BLKPRESIDENT at 03:31 PM : Aug 27, 2008
I''m not saying that just any woman could do it. Most men couldn''t do it either. But I am confident Hillary could. She is quite an extraordinary woman.
Margaret Thatcher and Indira Gandhi were the effective leaders of their respective countries during wartime. Terrorists really don''t care who is in charge. They are not afraid of George Bush and they won''t be afraid of Obama or McCain. Defeating them depends on diplomacy to win allies to the cause and careful and intelligent policy-making at the highest levels of government. Whether the Pres. is male or female is unimportant. - Reply to this comment
- When the terrorist hear that a girl is now in charge, where do you think that puts America, in terms of safety?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by BLKPRESIDENT at 03:31 PM
Most miliary decisions are made by Generals and commanders some of which are female as well, so you''re point is a little naive about how actions are made in the scope of the government....do you think America is any less potent, with a female Commander in Chief, a weapon (America) is just as lethal fired by a man or a woman - Reply to this comment
How gold pays for 
