Comments on: Recession In Rural Areas May Help Obama

Economic Woes For Farmers Could Make Them Rethink Republican Ties

Add a Comment See all 286 Comments
by starleo146 August 18, 2008 1:08 PM EDT
In their own pursuit of the free-market utopia, America''s right-wingers did not have as far to travel as their British cousins, and they have never needed to use their state power so ruthlessly. But the pattern is the same: scatter the left''s constituencies, hack open the liberal state and reward friendly businesses with the loot.

Grover Norquist, one of the most influential conservatives in Washington and the "field marshal of the Bush plan," according to the Nation magazine, has been most blunt about using the power of the state "to crush the structures of the left." He has outlined the plan countless times in countless venues: the liberal movement is supported by a number of "pillars," each of which can be toppled by conservatives when in power. Among Norquist''s suggestions has been the undermining of defense lawyers -- who in the US give millions of dollars to liberal causes -- with measures "potentially costing [them] billions of dollars of lost income." Conservatives could also "crush labour unions as a political entity" by forcing unions to get annual written approval from every member before spending union funds on political activities. His coup de grace is that the Democratic Party in its entirety would become "a dead man walking" with the privatization of social security.
Reply to this comment
by starleo146 August 18, 2008 1:07 PM EDT
"Economics are the method; the object is to change the soul," she said, echoing Stalin. In the 34 years before she became prime minister, Britain rode a see-saw of nationalization, privatization and renationalization; Thatcher set out to end the game for good. Her plan for privatising council housing was designed not only to enthrone the market, but to encourage an ownership mentality and "change the soul" of an entire class of voters. When she sold off nationally owned industries, she took steps to ensure that workers received shares at below-market rates, leading hopefully to the same soul transformation. Her brutal suppression of the miners'' strike in 1984 showed what now awaited those who resisted the new order. As a Business Week reporter summarized it in 1987: "She sees her mission as nothing less than eradicating Labour Party socialism as a political alternative."
Reply to this comment
by starleo146 August 18, 2008 1:06 PM EDT
When I first moved to contemplate this peculiar utopian vision, I was struck by its apparent futility. What I did not understand was that beating liberal ideas was not the goal. The Washington conservatives aim to make liberalism irrelevant not by debating, but by erasing it. Building a majority coalition has always been a part of the program, and conservatives have enjoyed remarkable success at it for more than 30 years. But winning elections was not a bid for permanence by itself. It was only a means.

The end was capturing the state, and using it to destroy liberalism as a practical alternative. The pattern was set by Margaret Thatcher, who used state power of the heaviest-handed sort to implant permanently the anti-state ideology.
Reply to this comment
by starleo146 August 18, 2008 1:05 PM EDT
The Plot Against Liberal America

By Thomas Frank, The New Statesman. Posted August 18, 2008.

Conservatives don''t want to debate, they want to destroy their opposition.

Also in Democracy and Elections

Ohio''s Election Stolen Again? State May Face 600K Voter Purge in Coming Weeks

Voting Machines Can Never Be Trusted, Says GOP Computer Security Expert








The most cherished dream of conservative Washington is that liberalism can somehow be defeated, finally and irreversibly, in the way that armies are beaten and pests are exterminated. Electoral victories by Republicans are just part of the story. The larger vision is of a future in which liberalism is physically barred from the control room -- of an "end of history" in which taxes and onerous regulation will never be allowed to threaten the fortunes private individuals make for themselves. This is the longing behind the former White House aide Karl Rove''s talk of "permanent majority" and, 20 years previously, disgraced lobbyist Jack Abramoff''s declaration to the Republican convention that it''s "the job of all revolutions to make permanent their gains
Reply to this comment
by omega39-2009 August 18, 2008 1:05 PM EDT
President Bush won nearly 70 percent of the county''s vote in both 2000 and 2004, but the standard of living here has declined steadily during his administration.

What do you know, karma works.
Reply to this comment
by mycommentspg August 18, 2008 1:04 PM EDT
If the people in these communities take the time to study all the real issues and the candidates, the choice in November will be easy. A leader with the experience to get the job done is the only choice. http://mycommentspage.blogspot.com/
Reply to this comment
See all 286 Comments
  • MOST POPULAR
Discussed
  1. Iran OKs 10 New Uranium Enrichment Sites

    (248 recent comments)

Exclusive Webshow

Mike Huckabee on GOP "rock stars," 2012, health care reform and more. Watch Now

Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: