Comments on: Obama Back On Home Soil After Foreign Tour
Democratic Candidate Lands In Chicago; Deflected Criticism Of His Trip Earlier In The Day
Add a Comment See all 705 Comments
- I saw Richard Clark testify that he warned Bush.
I saw the Katrina victims on Fox news - Reply to this comment
- If they have PROOF of atrocities, hiding it is criminal.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by WellHell3 at 02:39 PM : Jul 27
The fact that information of atrocities has been buried...is very suggestive of complicity...if all you want to do is point fingers. - Reply to this comment
- That would be because they are incompetent and probably afraid to take on the neo-cons. Our democratic congress has been a disappointment. But, they''''re not criminal.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by sandy19731
If they have PROOF of atrocities, hiding it is criminal. - Reply to this comment
- For failing to protect America on 9/11
For killing over 650,000 Iraqis for no reason at all.
For failing to respond to Katrina victims.
For carrying on a 40 year associations with the Bin Ladens and then allowing them to escape.
shall I continue?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by whitemale08 at 02:36 PM
When you''ve got proof of all these accusations, let me know OK?
Otherwise all I see is a bunch of finger pointing and talking points in an election year. - Reply to this comment
- The proof you want is in Sen. Kucinich''''''''s testimony to Congress regarding impeachment of Pres. Bush. It will go no-where, but the proof is there. And, it will go in the history books.
----------------------------------
----------------------------------------
------
Posted by sandy19731 at
Why did the democrats bury it for two years and bring it out in an election year knowing that they can''''t prove it up before November? And that it will take years to sort it out and prove it? IF there is any proof to be had!
Posted by WellHell3 at 02:21 PM : Jul 27, 2008
That would be because they are incompetent and probably afraid to take on the neo-cons. Our democratic congress has been a disappointment. But, they''re not criminal. - Reply to this comment
- Posted by whitemale08 at 02:30
Justice for WHAT?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by WellHell3 at 02:33 PM : Jul 27, 2008--
For failing to protect America on 9/11
For killing over 650,000 Iraqis for no reason at all.
For failing to respond to Katrina victims.
For carrying on a 40 year associations with the Bin Ladens and then allowing them to escape.
shall I continue? - Reply to this comment
- Posted by jon2012 at 02:25 PM
AGAIN, when the democrat screeching is proven up and somebody is headed to jail I will believe their krap once again! Until that happens they have lost all credibility and are in fact propagandizing this country!
Posted by WellHell3 at 02:27 PM : Jul 27, 2008
You are dismissing evidence offered to you without any counter evidence or proof. Let''s remember, I only did that--cite evidence of Bush lies--because you asked. I didn''t really care to get into it since the matter appears already settled. But to dismiss evidence, you need to attack it which shouldn''t be hard since you have 935 chances. Show me at least the first 10 ''lies'' were valid statements of facts. Maybe 935 will take forever. - Reply to this comment
- All this justice ***** is wonderful ideology? Justice for exactly WHAT?
- Reply to this comment
- hope Obama will use his Presidential powers to send George Bush to the Hague to be prosecuted like Milosevich. That''''s what the world is waiting for...justuce.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by whitemale08 at 02:30
Justice for WHAT? - Reply to this comment
- I hope Obama will use his Presidential powers to send George Bush to the Hague to be prosecuted like Milosevich. That''s what the world is waiting for...justuce.
- Reply to this comment
- It''''s your turn. If the study was flawed, you would have to dispute those 935 ''''lies'''' one at a time, all of them. That''''s the only way to discount my evidence of lying on the part of Bush.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by jon2012 at 02:25 PM
AGAIN, when the democrat screeching is proven up and somebody is headed to jail I will believe their krap once again! Until that happens they have lost all credibility and are in fact propagandizing this country! - Reply to this comment
- Posted by jon2012
I can show and PROVE UP about 70 lies of Obscamma''''s and yet you sit in that chair and believe his *****!
Again, the AP is needed to put it''''s information up as proof, it needs to be PROVEN that it''''s true, and somebody needs to go to jail for crimes...
Haven''''t heard a peep out of anybody with the authority to make it so.
Posted by WellHell3 at 02:17 PM : Jul 27, 2008
It''s your turn. If the study was flawed, you would have to dispute those 935 ''lies'' one at a time, all of them. That''s the only way to discount my evidence of lying on the part of Bush. - Reply to this comment
- The necons are done. Finished. And they know it! Time for a change!
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by IRLiberal at 02
Last time I heard CHANGE the Neocons were proposing it! Americans are not going fall for that ***** again! Especially from this Islamofast hugging bastward. - Reply to this comment
- The proof you want is in Sen. Kucinich''''s testimony to Congress regarding impeachment of Pres. Bush. It will go no-where, but the proof is there. And, it will go in the history books.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by sandy19731 at
Why did the democrats bury it for two years and bring it out in an election year knowing that they can''t prove it up before November? And that it will take years to sort it out and prove it? IF there is any proof to be had! - Reply to this comment
- You can tell Obama will win. Just look at the neocons crying and wailing and what more proof do you need? 8-)
----------------------------------
----------------------------------------
------
Posted by IRLiberal at 02:13
What rock is he going to find the votes under to make this so.
Posted by WellHell3 at 02:19 PM
Make as many insults as you want, Rowdywicca. Or whatever you want to call yourself these days. The truth remains that you would not so desperately and spasmodically post if you weren''t worried as h*ell... and you have good reason to be.
The necons are done. Finished. And they know it! Time for a change! - Reply to this comment
- You can tell Obama will win. Just look at the neocons crying and wailing and what more proof do you need? 8-)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by IRLiberal at 02:13
What rock is he going to find the votes under to make this so. - Reply to this comment
- Posted by jon2012 at 02:
You present one man''''''''s opinion as some kind of PROOF?
Again, show me some PROOF! Where is it! Put it on the table and let''''''''s look at it! Don''''''''t write some stupid opinion piece and call it facts. That''''''''s hogwarsh!
Posted by WellHell3 at
You are talking about proving up crimes! Where''''s your PROOF!
Posted by WellHell3 at 02:12 PM : Jul 27, 2008
If the study is bogus you will have to dispute that. And to dispute that, you will have to present your ''proof'' that the ''lies'' were, every one of them, valid statements of facts. There were 935 of them. You may start anytime. - Reply to this comment
- What about a YouTube video...
Posted by WellHell3 at 02:14 PM : Jul 27, 2008
It''s w talking, his face, his lie about wmd''s at 1:12 in. It''s what you asked for. Face it. You''re full of cr@p. - Reply to this comment
- The proof you want is in Sen. Kucinich''s testimony to Congress regarding impeachment of Pres. Bush. It will go no-where, but the proof is there. And, it will go in the history books.
- Reply to this comment
- The burden of proof shifts to you, now. The White House did not respond to the study. Maybe you can. Tell us how those 935 instances of lying were in fact truthful. The AP apparently thinks they were. And so do the rest of the world.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by jon2012
I can show and PROVE UP about 70 lies of Obscamma''s and yet you sit in that chair and believe his *****!
Again, the AP is needed to put it''s information up as proof, it needs to be PROVEN that it''s true, and somebody needs to go to jail for crimes...
Haven''t heard a peep out of anybody with the authority to make it so. - Reply to this comment
Mike Huckabee on GOP "rock stars," 2012, health care reform and more.
