Comments on: Gay Advocates Assail McCain Over Adoptions
Republican Criticized For Comments Opposing Gay Adoptions; Later Says It's A State Issue
Add a Comment See all 65 Comments
- What more could a child hope for...being adopted by a gay couple! It would be an amazing life. They are usually rich. They have great style and taste. The child would live a great life. Florida should allow *** to adopt. South Beach would corner the market.
- Reply to this comment
- As one who identifies with Pagan/earth/spiritual/nature based beliefs with NO cracky deity threatening us, I''''m glad I never bought into all that xtian KRAP- they worship DEATH.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by newster1 at 08:51 PM : Jul 15, 2008
You need to crawl somewhere, anywhere, and get a grip on reality......and don''t come out till the light hurts your eyes. Then you might be open to the truth......but as you are.....you''re as blind as a mole. - Reply to this comment
- I can''''t imagine the torture these children would endure amongst decent society. I wasn''''t going to vote for McCain but I am now!
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by MyOpinion1 at 08:12 PM : Jul 15, 2008
+ report abuse
********************************
Yeah, right. I am sure you were going to vote for Obama, but NOW are voting for McCain because he is on the fence on an issue that doesn''t affect you at all. - Reply to this comment
- noseonurface, great words: "... perversion of society ..."
However I think perversion of our society permeates with divorce.
We need new laws to remove children from one parent families and move them in with two parent families.
Voila! No more perversions of society.
Simple - quick - clean. - Reply to this comment
- Gay and Lesbian parents are a contradiction in terms, in society, in morality, in nature, in common sense, in science, in biology, in every way. It is a perversion of society that reveals the degeneration of the moral compass of a nation.
Thank God that our NEXT president is taking a stand against it.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by noseonurface at 08:40 PM : Jul 15, 2008
+ report abuse
***************************************
What are you talking about. I don''t think Obama opposes gay adoptions. Bravo Obama!! - Reply to this comment
- Whoever this designer is that your talking about is "your" designer, not mine. My designer wants every child to have a loving home.
My designer believes in kindness, compassion, and civility above all.
My designer believes in "life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness" as long as that pursuit doesn''''t harm others. I love my designer.
Posted by kansas1946
I think the dude means bajebus our ''saviour'' who ''saved'' us from his own father but temporarily ''died'' in the process!
This is the SAME entities who threaten to destroy this and that, stand by and let all sorts of tragedies happen, even to innocent animals, who ''designed'' a system of life that requires brutal gruesome deaths of innocent creatures to feed others- even if it''s newborn "Bambi" who gets the big chomp by a lion. The SAME entity who creates people knowing most will have brutal deaths and burn in his hel1- all for his amusement.
Yeah, sounds like an entity ID like to worship, NOT!!!
As one who identifies with Pagan/earth/spiritual/nature based beliefs with NO cracky deity threatening us, I''m glad I never bought into all that xtian KRAP- they worship DEATH. - Reply to this comment
- 1-Man+ 1-Woman raising 1-child to adulthood with values is the design. If youve got a better idea, talk to the Designer.
Posted by maxify55
And who might this "designer" be? Martha Stewart?
Marriage is a human invention designed to garner fees and control property, inheritance, taxes and minors, but with an almost predictable built-in 50% failure rate it''s time to try something NEW!
The loads of single parents, widows, divorced people etc raising kids is no different than a g@y person or couple.
According to your argument then I guess we should strip all of those people of kids and allow only MARRIED couples to ever have any. New law: The moment you get a divorce the kids are removed by the state child protective services and placed in a new home.
Husband died in a car wreck last week? sorry, you''ll have to hand over your 3 kids to CPS now so we can place them in a "good" home with 1 man and 1 woman who are MARRIED. Sounds good to me! - Reply to this comment
- "Sen. McCain would deny loving homes to children who desperately need them simply because of an outdated prejudice about what a family may look like," Huckaby said.
What a line of BS.
Gay and Lesbian parents are a contradiction in terms, in society, in morality, in nature, in common sense, in science, in biology, in every way. It is a perversion of society that reveals the degeneration of the moral compass of a nation.
Thank God that our NEXT president is taking a stand against it. Bravo McCain! - Reply to this comment
- MyOpinion1, "... eradicating the disease of homosexuality ... "
How?
Evangelical Christians have tried everything, however they just keep a coming. - Reply to this comment
- Good for Sen. McCain, even if his remarks were far too politically correct for me. Maybe we should put the whole issue of gay rights to a national vote. Is there any question as to what the outcome would be? The issue would no longer be an issue - ever! I am sick and tired of minority interest groups trying to forcing unwanted changes on the majority. What happened to Democracy, or is there a new politically correct definition?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by mystand at 06:59 PM : Jul 15, 2008
+ report abuse
**********************************************
The majority can not violate the civil liberties of a minority. That is what our constition is all about. - Reply to this comment
- 1-Man+ 1-Woman raising 1-child to adulthood with values is the design. If you''''''''ve got a better idea, talk to the Designer. Don''''''''t make up moral standards as you go along. It''''''''s all written down for you, but, of course, you knew that already. You''''''''re smarter than the Designer. How foolish of me to suggest such a thought to a people so much more gifted than the Designer, Himself.
************************************************
Whoever this designer is that your talking about is "your" designer, not mine. My designer wants every child to have a loving home. My designer would want the government to support the foster care system and childrens programs with money, not just wave signs about the poor babies. My designer wants everyone to get along and not push their beliefs on other through legislation. My designer believes in kindness, compassion, and civility above all.
My designer believes in "life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness" as long as that pursuit doesn''t harm others. I love my designer. - Reply to this comment
- Posted by SgtRDS10-4 at 07:00 PM
It makes points with the terroristic fundamentalist Christians, who, if they had their way, would do away with the Constitution and force everyone to live the good Christian life they always have. Yes, they would make Bible reading and prayer a must in every school and take out any reference to anything remotely scientific in text books. Keeping people in ignorance is a must with these folks. - Reply to this comment
- 1-Man+ 1-Woman raising 1-child to adulthood with values is the design. If you''''ve got a better idea, talk to the Designer. Don''''t make up moral standards as you go along. It''''s all written down for you, but, of course, you knew that already. You''''re smarter than the Designer. How foolish of me to suggest such a thought to a people so much more gifted than the Designer, Himself.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by maxify55 at 07:01 PM
So let''s take all the kids away from single parent homes and put them all in good Christian homes, where there is no divorce. Mother is always home baking bread and taking care of the house. While father is busy plowing the fields and growing the wheat for another year. That is the design. - Reply to this comment
- Who cares?
Politically, they are aligned with the Democrats so why is this a story? - Reply to this comment
- Ah, that designer maxify55 talks about.
How many children born in American lived their entire lives as slaves because of how the Designer''s words were read?
Not a proud design to live by, I''d say. - Reply to this comment
- So, McCain feels that it''s NOT OK for a homosexual couple who love and respect each other to adopt a child from another country who might otherwise not have any sort of hope for a family at all. On the other hand, it IS OK for a "traditional family" of a man and a woman to adopt, even if the man had deserted his wife who had stood by him while he was a POW, in favor of a woman that he was infatuated with and eighteen years his junior? I''m just trying to wrap this ill-concieved logic around my brain, so it is crystal clear.
- Reply to this comment
- For the party that claims to be so pro-family the GOP sure seems to do everything it can to prevent families from forming. There are many gay couples around here that have adopted children and they all seem to be happy and well-adjusted. certainly much more so then they''d be in an orphanage or in foster care.
- Reply to this comment
- Good for Sen. McCain, even if his remarks were far too politically correct for me. Maybe we should put the whole issue of gay rights to a national vote. Is there any question as to what the outcome would be? The issue would no longer be an issue - ever! I am sick and tired of minority interest groups trying to forcing unwanted changes on the majority. What happened to Democracy, or is there a new politically correct definition?
- Reply to this comment
- This time, I do care. The child, assuming supporters of this nightmare can even understand the concept of selflessness, has feelings and PEERS too. Everyone gets picked on, et cetera, to an extent, but those with higher IQs, PDDs, and other maladies are treated far worse as default. Children of couples, divorced because the male diddled with another male, often get treated horribly - never mind the divorce. Now think of a child, raised by two homosexual parents - the concept of which is automatically alien to 90% or more of the population. It''s not going to be pretty. At all.
The moment you acquire a child is the moment the life is about the child, its well being, and to give it a future. Not your own lives, especially if politics becomes involved. And I say that EQUALLY for anybody who raises children; regardless of what they fiddle with under some bedsheets or otherwise. You''re there for the CHILD(ren). Period. And that seems to be the aspect ignored by almost everybody. - Reply to this comment
- Posted by snapper4298 at 06:42 PM : Jul 15, 2008
--------
It what way? there aren''t enough people taking kids out of Foster Homes now. Why exclude ***? Because YOU don''t like ***? - Reply to this comment
How gold pays for 
