Comments on: Obama's Call For Unity Faces Abortion Test

CBSNews.com Reports: As He Courts Evangelicals, Some Activists Look To Label Dem Candidate "The Abortion President"

Add a Comment See all 1263 Comments
by providence_k July 10, 2008 2:36 AM EDT
Posted by SgtRDS10-4 at 11:29 PM : Jul 09, 2008

It has to do with God calling it murder. If God calls it murder than they are murdered. If they are murdered they were murdered by a murderer. If someone supports a murderer they are complicit in the crime of killing babies in the womb! 5000 babies a day are murdered. Jesus would not murder babies. If Obama was a christian he would not support murdering of babies.
Reply to this comment
by johnmcsame July 10, 2008 2:33 AM EDT
I am strongly against abortion. But there is one exception. I wished Hussein''''s mother had aborted him. That would have gotten rid from this world a great evil person.
Reply to this comment
by providence_k July 10, 2008 2:32 AM EDT
Posted by rdp842003 at 11:26 PM : Jul 09, 2008

Judging someone is totally different from what God calls wrong and against His will. God calls it murder! You you call what God says as judging in reference to murderer you do not understand right from wrong? You just want self and sin without the consequences!
The cross is the finish work of Jesus? He was sacrificed to pay your sin debt.
Reply to this comment
by johnmcsame July 10, 2008 2:32 AM EDT
Posted by rdp842003 at 11:26 PM : Jul 09, 2008

rdp842003, even the devil can cite Scripture for his purpose. We are not judging you. We are stopping evil from taking place.
Reply to this comment
by sgtrds10-4 July 10, 2008 2:29 AM EDT
Why do people have to constantly drag their version of what they think some god says about this? This is not a religious issue. It''s a legal/women''s rights issue. Religion has nothing to to with it since it is an issue of what is allowed under American law, not what''s allowed in some-one''s book of fairy tales. Bringing the judeo/christian god myth into this has as much validity as saying abortion should be outlawed because The Three Bears or Scooby-Doo don''t like it.
Reply to this comment
by johnmcsame July 10, 2008 2:27 AM EDT
I am strongly against abortion. But there is one exception. I wished Hussein''s mother had aborted him. That would have gotten rid from this world a great evil person.
Reply to this comment
by johnmcsame July 10, 2008 2:24 AM EDT
i am not for abortion the difference between me and you is that i am not arrogant enough to force my opinion upon anyone else i believe in god but respect the fact that some people might not share the same sentiment. the problem in this country is just that. we love to point fingers and criticize everyone instead of looking in the mirror and getting off our high horse and try to sympathize with people

Posted by rdp842003 at 11:15 PM : Jul 09, 2008

Do you expect us to turn out head while you murder an innocent life.
Reply to this comment
by providence_k July 10, 2008 2:21 AM EDT
i am not for abortion the difference between me and you is that i am not arrogant enough to force my opinion upon anyone else i believe in god but respect the fact that some people might not share the same sentiment. the problem in this country is just that. we love to point fingers and criticize everyone instead of looking in the mirror and getting off our high horse and try to sympathize with people

Posted by rdp842003 at 11:15 PM : Jul 09, 2008

God says its wrong! And I have to agree with him and not your feelings or opinion!
Reply to this comment
by atlanta1962 July 10, 2008 2:08 AM EDT
and what about all the kids that are throwed away every day by families and states please get off we are doing this for God please you all do not know God even God getting tired of you all and the noise
Reply to this comment
by providence_k July 10, 2008 2:07 AM EDT
always interested in kids in the womb but when their out you are no where to be found

Posted by rdp842003 at 11:04 PM : Jul 09, 2008
Im with you this is called irresponsibility. But does that mean kill the babies I hardly think so.
Reply to this comment
by providence_k July 10, 2008 1:57 AM EDT
simply means u believe in freedom of choice.

Posted by rdp842003 at 10:54 PM : Jul 09, 2008

Yes you are free to murder a baby in the womb? God calls this murder. Humans call this self and do not want to listen to God.
Reply to this comment
by providence_k July 10, 2008 1:49 AM EDT
God please help us if this is really Barrack Obamas thinking!

Not only Barrack Obama wants to condone atrocities by killing Babies in the womb he wants us now to pay for the executions? This is so sad I cannot imagine anyone voting for him after this!

This idea comes right out of the pits of Hell!

I guess this is the TYPICAL UN-BIBLICAL Barrack Obama! This is not what Jesus would do seeing Barrack Obama says he is a Christian!

5000 babies a day being killed! Listen 5000 babies a day! And Barrack will do this in the name of God? This is evil, the taking of babies lives, does he not know this already!

I could just see it now in the future? Churches paying with tax dollars for babies to be executed! If they do not pay these taxes will the government shut down churches throughout America? If they open their mouths the government will make sure they never open it again!
Reply to this comment
by providence_k July 10, 2008 1:47 AM EDT
JOHN QUINCY ADAMS
When he 14 he was appointed Congressional diplomatic ambassador to The Court of Catherine the Great of Russia! He served also as foreign ambassador, Secretary of state, U.S. representative, senator and of course President!
SPEECH BY JOHN QUINCY ADAMS July 4, 1837
Why is it that, next to the birth day of the Savior of the world, your most joyous and most venerated festival returns on this day. The fourth of July.
Is it not that, in the chain of human events, the birth-day of the nation is indissolubly linked with the birth-day of the Savior? That it forms a leading event in the progress of the gospel dispensation? Is it not that the Declaration of independence first organized the social compact on the foundation of the Redeemer%u2019s mission upon earth? That it laid the cornerstone of human government upon the first precepts of Christianity?

John Quincy Adams said the biggest victory won in the revolution was that Christian Principles and Civil government would be tied together in an indissolubly bond!
Reply to this comment
by providence_k July 10, 2008 1:46 AM EDT
James Madison
One of the chief architects of the constitution.
%u201CWe have staked the whole future of American civilization, not upon the power of government, far from it. We have staked the future of all of our political institutions upon the capacity of each and all of us to govern ourselves according to the Ten Commandments of God.%u201D


If you notice he did say political institutions.
Reply to this comment
by providence_k July 10, 2008 1:44 AM EDT
separation of church and state do not fund religious organizations in any way.

This term is no where in our constitution? It was pushed by the ACLU in 1947.
I have about 40 quotes of the founding fathers to prove this. Here is one.
Excerpt from George Washingtons farewell address!
Let us with caution indulge the supposition that morality can be maintained without religion. Whatever may be conceded to the influence or refined education on mind-reason and experience both forbid us to expect that national morality can prevail in exclusion of religious principle.

Washington warned to lose religious principles would lose national morality!
Reply to this comment
by providence_k July 10, 2008 1:42 AM EDT
If 5000 "babies" are being killed a day then shouldn''''t you blame the presdident sitting now and not a candidate?

Posted by zerato at 10:16 PM : Jul 09, 2008

Obama wants all of us to pay for the executions of babies! I here of no one else! Do you know who Molech in scriptures was.
Reply to this comment
by memerider July 10, 2008 1:40 AM EDT
I think both abortion funding and faith-based funding should be selectable from a menu by taxpayers, so those who are against abortion do not fund those and those who affirm separation of church and state do not fund religious organizations in any way.

We have the technology to do this now--let the taxpayers decide how much they wish to give to fund these various services.
Reply to this comment
by providence_w July 10, 2008 1:37 AM EDT
A lawyer should sue on the behalf of the baby in the womb? When two people say yes to having seexx they are making a contract to what results from the union. So if a baby is conceived the baby has the rights guaranteed under the binding contract of the verbal consented union. Another words the baby has rights as a person because of the union, agreement! A binding contract is when two people agree to a course of action, a pledge if you will!

Sounds like a good concept for lawyers and the constitution to get on board and fight this all the way to the Supreme Court! Do you think these two will win?
This reminds me of a H-T-L-E-R movie were all the Jews were put to death by choice! I think we referred to it as an atrocity.
Reply to this comment
by providence_w July 10, 2008 1:36 AM EDT
A lawyer should sue on the behalf of the baby in the womb? When two people say yes to having seexx they are making a contract to what results from the union. So if a baby is conceived the baby has the rights guaranteed under the binding contract of the verbal consented union. Another words the baby has rights as a person because of the union, agreement! A binding contract is when two people agree to a course of action, a pledge if you will!

Sounds like a good concept for lawyers and the constitution to get on board and fight this all the way to the Supreme Court! Do you think these two will win?
This reminds me of a H-T-L-E-R movie were all the Jews were put to death by choice! I think we referred to it as an atrocity.The smell of death.
Take a moment right now and just imagine what it will be like when you die? Where will you go?
Reply to this comment
by providence_w July 10, 2008 1:34 AM EDT
Hey lets just crack the skulls break the legs and also let us decapitate these defenseless babies. Where is congress, Supreme Court justices who would defend these helpless babies? Why would mothers cater to being self centered? Why would the fathers continue to be irresponsible? Where is the consciousness of America? I thought this was the land of the free not the dawn of the dead! Where are the voices to silence these crimes that are horrendous in our generation? Our liberty bell rings with an inscription on it %u201CProclaim liberty throughout all lands and to all the inhabitants thereof." Will America let the Liberty bell ring for these defenseless babies? Is the garbage can the only place for our children%u2019s babies? People cry what about the life of the mother. In today%u2019s world that%u2019s like saying how many angels can dance on the tip of a needle. We know of the technology health breakthroughs so it would b rare. We all know abortion caters to some choosing to be self centered. That%u2019s why the law should b for the equal right of the unborn baby who knows not of someone choice but the right to love and be loved. We cannot exclude the innocent babies. Some people want freedom 4 themselves not 2 B responsible! Which again is self centered. People who are self centered give way to other ideologies which can ruin our moral heritage. The thread that starts with destroying a life allows other threads to b destroyed allows even our constitution to b cast to ruin.
Reply to this comment
See all 1263 Comments
  • MOST POPULAR
Discussed
  1. Iran OKs 10 New Uranium Enrichment Sites

    (289 recent comments)

Exclusive Webshow

Mike Huckabee on GOP "rock stars," 2012, health care reform and more. Watch Now

Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: