Comments on: Clinton Cites Robert Kennedy Assassination

Long Shot Democratic Candidate Points To 1968 Assassination As Reason To Continue Campaign

Add a Comment See all 878 Comments
by fake-id-2009 May 25, 2008 3:31 AM EDT
If RFK didn''t find it offensive why should anyone else.
Posted by patriot12436 at 12:01 AM : May 25, 2008


So, according to your way of thinking, we''re not entitled to our own opinion? We should get "in step" behind RFK Jr.?

LOL!!! Anytime anyone uses "patriot" in their login name it''s usually a ruse and belies their true beliefs.


Reply to this comment
by fake-id-2009 May 25, 2008 3:13 AM EDT
Rowdywicca, Is that you Rowdytexan2?
Posted by jedi080808 at 11:29 PM : May 24, 2008


Yup!! RowdyWicca-RowdyTexan2...one and the same. Neither one will answer questions about her sources for all the BS she posts.

RowdyWicca and all her imaginary neopagan and witch friends. Go back to between 3:55 - 6:00 AM Sat morning and read some of her very strange posts supposedly written by her wiccan friends but posted by her.


Reply to this comment
by patriot12436 May 25, 2008 3:04 AM EDT
Maybe i should have said successful politician.
Reply to this comment
by patriot12436 May 25, 2008 3:03 AM EDT
jedi080808
First rule to becoming a good politician, be willing to screw everyone and everything.
Reply to this comment
by patriot12436 May 25, 2008 3:01 AM EDT
pepperwood2
I read the story and didn''t find it offensive. If RFK didn''t find it offensive why should anyone else. Maybe she could have worded things better, but campaigning is a very tiring job, anyone could make a fruedian slip at such times.
Reply to this comment
by down-ndirty May 25, 2008 3:00 AM EDT
POTUS.
Posted by down-ndirty
.. .. ..
New kind of Pot Pie I assume?
Posted by bhoogren at 09:38 PM : May 24, 2008


Yeah, minced-meat (Bush); elderberry (McCain); black-eyed peas (Obama); and rhubarb (Hellary).

Rhubarb tends to be bitter if not "sweetened" properly.

LOL!!! A "genius" moment in my otherwise normally befuddled mind!!

POTUS...look it up.

Reply to this comment
by patriot12436 May 25, 2008 2:59 AM EDT
blackpresident
Haven''t seen you on in a while. Been stuck in th kitchen baking cookies for lil missy ?
Reply to this comment
by pepperwood2 May 25, 2008 2:55 AM EDT
Did Hillary''''s RFK Remark Doom Her?

If it didn''''t it most certainly should. It shows what diabolical & devious mind set this Woman has.

Robert Kennedy was one of our most beloved and caring candidate''''s this country has ever seen. Senator Ted Kennedy, the liberal lion, as he is often referred to, endorsed Obama, much to the chagrine of Hillary. Senator Kennedy has also recently been diagnosed with terminal cancer of the brain.

To Hillary this was an opportunity to SAY LOUD & CLEAR FOR ALL AMERICANS to see what me Hillary Clinton is all about. Will not pass up a sick & perverted opportunity that this afforded. GOTCHA TED - GOTCHA OBAMA.

CACKLE CACKLE CACKLE - So blatantly contempable. The Clinton''''s diversive & polarizing polictics. It''''s time for them to go!
Reply to this comment
by jedi080808 May 25, 2008 2:34 AM EDT
Lets seen McCain''s first wife got in an accident so he cheated on her and left her. He also was involeved in that scam that screwed all those people out of their money. Then Billary had That Foster guy murdered, admits to hopping Obama is killed and countless other things.

Obama has a big month Pastor and the last name Obama

So ask yourself, which two are worse
Reply to this comment
by jedi080808 May 25, 2008 2:29 AM EDT
Rowdywicca, Is that you Rowdytexan2?
Reply to this comment
by rowdywicca May 25, 2008 2:10 AM EDT
He managed to burnish a reformer%u2019s reputation while swimming in the muddy waters of special-interest- infested state politics.

He worked on a nice-guy image while practicing the hardball and brawling tactics of Chicago-style politics.

Now, promoting himself as a fresh face on the national political stage, proclaiming his distance from lobbyists and the Washington culture of special interests, Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.) has to contend with his own history.

From Chicago to Springfield, his past is filled with decidedly old-school political tactics %u2013 a history of befriending powerful local elders, assisting benefactors and special interests, and neutralizing rivals.

Obama may be packaged as something new among presidential contenders, but in this town where politics is played like a blood sport he fit right in.

Reply to this comment
by rowdywicca May 25, 2008 2:09 AM EDT
But Obama%u2019s record of local endorsements %u2014 one measure of how he has used his nascent political clout %u2014 has drawn criticism from those who say it reflects his deference to Chicago%u2019s established political order and runs counter to his public calls for clean government.%u201D

%u201CIn the 2006 Democratic primary, for example, Obama endorsed first-time candidate Alexi Giannoulias for state treasurer despite reports about loans Giannoulias%u2019 family-owned Broadway Bank made to crime figures. Records show Giannoulias and his family had given more than $10,000 to Obama%u2019s campaign, which banked at Broadway.%u201D

%u201CObama endorsed former Ald. Dorothy Tillman (3rd), calling her %u201Ca very early supporter of my campaign.%u201D Tillman was then under fire for her stewardship of the scandal-plagued Harold Washington Cultural Center, where contracts benefited members of her family.%u201D

Reply to this comment
by blkpresident May 25, 2008 1:02 AM EDT
Anybody seen old man McCain''s "blankie"? Wonder if that weenie has had his naps today?
Reply to this comment
by Latrocinor May 25, 2008 12:38 AM EDT
POTUS.

Posted by down-ndirty
.. .. ..

New kind of Pot Pie I assume?
Reply to this comment
by jedi080808 May 25, 2008 12:32 AM EDT
I''m sure thats not what Billary ment to say. Just ask Vince Foster
Reply to this comment
by down-ndirty May 25, 2008 12:21 AM EDT
This doesn''''t give me much reason to accept anything you say as objective. You can be as adamantly democratic as you want but that doesn''''t mean you are right.
Posted by alanrobisch2 at 08:29 PM : May 24, 2008


In addition, if you have been following the campaigns or have done any reading outside of CBS and these boards then you would know there is a bit of truth in what I posted at 8:07 PM.

You must also know that history shows that most people who vote their party in the primary will also vote their party in November. Since the numbers of Dems and Reps is about equal, it''s the swing voters who make the difference.

It doesn''t make any difference if you think it''s objective or not. It''s just my opinion. But I do spend a lot of time reading...

Reply to this comment
by down-ndirty May 25, 2008 12:12 AM EDT
Personnaly, I don''t give a rat''s asss who the Dem nominee is; I happen to like Hellary less. But I will NEVER vote Rep.
Posted by down-ndirty at 08:07 PM : May 24, 2008

This doesn''t give me much reason to accept anything you say as objective. You can be as adamantly democratic as you want but that doesn''t mean you are right.
Posted by alanrobisch2 at 08:29 PM : May 24, 2008


If you voted for Bush then you would never accept anything a Dem said as objective. And I never said I was right; it''s just my opinion.

Besides, my comment was made in frustration that too often I have to vote for the "lessor" of two (or more) unqualified people. Unfortunately, starting with Nixon, the POTUS position has been sought by wealthy people who seek power rather than people who really want to make a difference. No different now.

That was very obvious with Nixon, Clinton, and Bush, jr.

Bush was/is obsessed with the power but no more qualified to be POTUS than he was to run an oil company.

Clinton was the BEST republican POTUS since Lincoln, not to mention he was the most dispicable person to ever occupy the WH. Nixon was obviously obsessed with the power of the POTUS.


Reply to this comment
by alanrobisch May 24, 2008 11:29 PM EDT
Personnaly, I don''''t give a rat''''s asss who the Dem nominee is; I happen to like Hellary less. But I will NEVER vote Rep.




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by down-ndirty at 08:07 PM : May 24, 2008
+ report abuse

This doesn''t give me much reason to accept anything you say as objective. You can be as adamantly democratic as you want but that doesn''t mean you are right.

I voted for bush for the same reason you''ll vote for anyone the dems nominate. We''re both loyal and maybe stupid to vote for a cadidate that is inately flawed.
Reply to this comment
by fake-id-2009 May 24, 2008 11:28 PM EDT
fake-id - You are trying to reason with unreasonable people. Save your energy to throw confetti when Obama wins in November and laugh at these jagoffs. They''''re pathetic and as desperate as their sorry-azz, vile candidate who has become worse than Karl Rove. At least Rove doesn''''t attack his own party.
Posted by EddyNewHope at 08:17 PM : May 24, 2008


I know. I keep reminding myself that I should stop arguing with fools before I get dragged down to their level.

Reply to this comment
by whofhearted0 May 24, 2008 11:25 PM EDT
Robert Kennedy was assassinated. Who cares?
Posted by JesusFace at 07:59 PM : May 24, 2008


Obviously not a troll like you, heysusebuttface. LOL!!!

Do you get some kind of "ecstatic experience," perhaps even a self-induced o r g a s m, by posting specious comments?
Reply to this comment
See all 878 Comments
  • MOST POPULAR
Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: