Comments on: Finance Reports Show Clinton's $20M Debt
Obama, McCain Have Millions In Hand Following Strong Fundraising Month While Clinton Finds Herself In The Red
Add a Comment See all 275 Comments
- Let the caucus states prove up their votes, and let''''s count ''''em...nobody wants to deny their votes! Bring ''''em on!
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by RowdyTexan2 at 10:16 AM : May 22, 2008
Sounds to me as if Hillary doesn''t want to count them. - Reply to this comment
- jesterbelle.....Interesting...Kind of sounds like Howard Dean, not counting the large amounts of Votes in Michigan and Florida, in order to get Obama nominated....What was so wrong with a re-vote? there was plenty of time....Reason: discounting these states was the only way to get Obama nominated.....AAAAAAHHHHHH!!!! Howard Dean
Posted by JoeCoolSwat at 10:17 AM : May 22, 2008
Those votes were deemed "unofficial" back in August and Florida, when there were still 10 or 12 candidates in the running.
How can you REASONABLY sit here and say that they killed those delegates 5 and 9 months ago, to benefit Obama, when they didn''t even know if he would still be around in the second week of January? (Note the key word "REASONABLY").
By the way, it was the STATES that decided NOT to have a re-vote. Not the DNC, not Hillary, not Obama, or anyone else. It was THE STATES that made the decision. - Reply to this comment
- What about the senario, where at the convention, the delagates arrive at a tie, or don''t come to a conclusion....Do the super-delagates then decide the winner?...In that case, Hillary could win? Am I wrong?
- Reply to this comment
- Let the caucus states prove up their votes, and let''''s count ''''em...nobody wants to deny their votes! Bring ''''em on!
Posted by RowdyTexan2 at 10:16 AM : May 22, 2008
They''re already there - they are called "delegates".
"Delegates" are the ONLY measure of success in the democratic nomination process. Her crying "popular vote, popular vote, popular vote" is only pandering to the super delegates, as a reason to overrule the elected delegates, and vote for her instead. Nothing more.
Writing off the delegates from four caucus states, just to try and steal the election, is beyond absurd. - Reply to this comment
- jesterbelle.....Interesting...Kind of sounds like Howard Dean, not counting the large amounts of Votes in Michigan and Florida, in order to get Obama nominated....What was so wrong with a re-vote? there was plenty of time....Reason: discounting these states was the only way to get Obama nominated.....AAAAAAHHHHHH!!!! Howard Dean
- Reply to this comment
- Speaking of manipulation.what''''s this I hear about Hillary not counting some of the caucas states in order to perpetuate her popular vote myth?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by jesterbelle at 10:13 AM : May 22, 2008
Let the caucus states prove up their votes, and let''s count ''em...nobody wants to deny their votes! Bring ''em on! - Reply to this comment
- They think the the democrats can''''t see this manipulation is HILARIOUS!
A FRESH new voice with same old dirty rotten politics, is the most HILARIOUS hoax on the people this century!
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by RowdyTexan2 at 10:01 AM : May 22, 2008
Speaking of manipulation.what''s this I hear about Hillary not counting some of the caucas states in order to perpetuate her popular vote myth? - Reply to this comment
- The point is, you can''''t win the general election without the majority vote! It''''s that simple.
And Obama promoting himself as being the winner without obtaining a win without PLEDGED state delegates...is HILARIOUS!
So what does the mafioso DNC do...goes out and bullies the superdelegates to start sounding off before the votes are in to try to bully the voters into voting for Obama and his oil and energy money!
It''''s HILARIOUS....(pardon the pun)
They think the the democrats can''''t see this manipulation is HILARIOUS!
A FRESH new voice with same old dirty rotten politics, is the most HILARIOUS hoax on the people this century!
Posted by RowdyTexan2 at 10:01 AM : May 22, 2008
He has already achieved the MOST pledged state delegates, and she can''t catch him. By your own benchmarks in this post, she''s already lost.
And how is the DNC bullying anyone? By urging them to make up their minds as soon as possible?
Your posts get more and more bizarre by the day!!! - Reply to this comment
- The point is, you can''t win the general election without the majority vote! It''s that simple.
And Obama promoting himself as being the winner without obtaining a win without PLEDGED state delegates...is HILARIOUS!
So what does the mafioso DNC do...goes out and bullies the superdelegates to start sounding off before the votes are in to try to bully the voters into voting for Obama and his oil and energy money!
It''s HILARIOUS....(pardon the pun)
They think the the democrats can''t see this manipulation is HILARIOUS!
A FRESH new voice with same old dirty rotten politics, is the most HILARIOUS hoax on the people this century! - Reply to this comment
- PA, TX, OH, CA, OK, AK, NY, MA, NJ, FLA, MI, WV, KY...
ALL key states in the election, HIllary has beaten the SNOT out of Obama...
Where did Obama win? IL, GA, NC, SC, MS, VA...and the rest with only marginal wins...and caucus states where they can''''t even prove up the votes...and where Hillary got votes also.
I just love the freaking media...
They''''re HILARIOUS! (pardon the pun)
Posted by RowdyTexan2 at 09:51 AM : May 22, 2008
I like how you post ALL the states that Hillary wins, and then you call them "key states".
So you think she''s going to win the general election by winning 1/3 of the electoral college states too?
How absurd!!! - Reply to this comment
Author Thomas Friedman on Obama's Afghanistan plan and the war on terror.
