Comments on: Bush Sparks Campaign Stir From Israel
Obama Reacts Harshly To Remarks About Appeasing Dictators; McCain, Clinton Join The Fray
Add a Comment See all 1935 Comments
- Well Dante805, I am also surprised and humored that Obama tok offense. Like I said in an earlier post; I assumed Bush was actually talking about the Republican Party, since it was a Republican senator who made the "appeasing" remark in 1939, and since the Republican Party had a solid record of Nazi sympathy and appeasement throughout the 1930s. So we are both laughing, but for different reasons.
- Reply to this comment
- JUST SHUT THE FRACK UP GEORGE BUSH YOU IDIOT AND THANKS FOR GIVING UP GOLF AND BEING SO HONEST.
- Reply to this comment
- It''s real funny how Obama and the corrupt DEMs were quick to assume that Bush was talking about Obama being the appeaser. I''m sure Jimmy Carter thought it was about him. And I''m sure Alec Baldwin and Sean Penn thought it was about them. Well it was - all about them not JUST Obama - Obama thinks everyone is always talking about him - could his head get any bigger - his ears can''t handle his head size as it is now. How is that May 20 victory party coming along? Seems like Hillary is trying to put a kink in that plan. LOL....
- Reply to this comment
- yfrompa45:
Would you nuke Iran?
Where is bin Laden, Iraq, Iran or Pakistan?
What is the connection between Hamas and Al Qaeda?
Who is supplying the majority of the insurgence in Iraq, Iran or Saudi Arabia?
The majority of 911 highjackers were form what country, Iraq, Iran or Saudi Arabia?
Which of the following countries has no major oil reserves: Iraq, Iran or Pakistan? Hint - bin Laden is rumored to be there. - Reply to this comment
- "a Nazi helper." Posted by abbe91
I have an even more accurate one, the Nazi gas supplier. - Reply to this comment
- uyfrompa45:
Would you nuke Iran?
Where is bin Laden, Iraq, Iran or Pakistan?
What is the connection between Hamas and Al Qaeda?
Who is supplying the majority of the insurgence in Iraq, Iran or Saudi Arabia?
The majority of 911 highjackers were form what country, Iraq, Iran or Saudi Arabia? - Reply to this comment
- I wouldn''''t call Prescott Bush a Nazi appeaser. I think there is a better word.
Posted by abbe91 at 08:50 AM : May 16, 2008
a Nazi helper. - Reply to this comment
- "Why do you thin Iran took hostages with Carter in office. Becuase they knew he was soft..." Posted by guyfrompa45
So why did terrorists decide to blow up the Beruit Marine barracks when Reagan was in office, and why did Al Queda attack on 9/11 when Bush was in office? Gee, I guess ALL our presidents are soft... Or maybe global politics are more complex than ridiculous AM radio talking points.
Hey guyfrompa45, the bell is ringing and it''s time for you to get back to high school history class. You''ve got alot to learn. - Reply to this comment
- uyfrompa45:
Would you nuke Iran?
Where is bin Laden, Iraq, Iran or Pakistan?
What is the connection between Hamas and Al Qaeda?
Who is supplying the majority of the insurgence in Iraq, Iran or Saudi Arabia? - Reply to this comment
- "(For ignorant Republicans, that would be a reference to GWB''''s grand-daddy; a notable Nazi appeaser and business partner). "
Posted by bigtimecynic at 08:43 AM : May 16, 2008
I wouldn''t call Prescott Bush a Nazi appeaser. I think there is a better word. - Reply to this comment
- My biggest problem with the current gang of Republicans isn''t their foreign policy ideology; it''s their unprecedented military incompetence. They screwed up Tora Bora, they''re still *** up Iraq and Afghanistan, the US-backed government in Lebanon is impotent, the US-backed Israeli incursion into Lebanon last year was a disaster. The list goes on and on. It''s fine when you want to use military force, but not when you have an approximate success rate of 0%. Get these jokers out of office. Can anyone convince Wes Clark to be the VP nominee for the Democrats? We desperately need SOMEBODY with a proven track record of military competence! No more Ivy League, ivory tower chicken hawks!
- Reply to this comment
- guyfrompa45:
Would you nuke Iran?
Where is bin Laden, Iraq, Iran or Pakistan?
What is the connection between Hamas and Al Qaeda? - Reply to this comment
- IN HIS OWN WORDS
From Obama''s Book, Audacity of Hope: ''I will stand with the Muslims should the political winds shift in an ugly direction.''
READ THIS BOOK!!!! - Reply to this comment
Total Delegate Count
Democrats | 2,025 Needed to Clinch
OBAMA 1,888
CLINTON 1,711
EDWARDS 17
Republicans | 1,191 Needed to Clinch
MCCAIN 1,337
HUCKABEE 231
ROMNEY 149
CBS News estimates. Includes super delegates.- Reply to this comment
- Truth
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/01/22/bill-clinton-severs-ties-_n_82616.htmln
Bill Clinton: Severs Ties With Burkle, May Reap $20 Million
January 22, 2008 09:29 AM
Read More: Bill Clinton, Clinton Burkle, Dubai, Hillary Clinton Yucaipa, Ron Burkle, Ron Burkle Bill Clinton, Ron Burkle Yucaipa, Yucaipa Bill Clinton, Yucaipa Companies, Breaking Politics News
Former President Clinton stands to reap around $20 million -- and will sever a politically sensitive partnership tie to Dubai -- by ending his high-profile business relationship with the investment firm of billionaire friend Ron Burkle.
Note: Mr. Clinton is negotiating to end his relationship with Mr. Burkles Yucaipa Cos. as part of a broader effort to protect the presidential campaign of his wife, Sen. Hillary Clinton, from potential conflicts of interest. Details of Mr. Clintons involvement in Yucaipa and his efforts to unwind it come from documents and interviews with people familiar - Reply to this comment
- taotxzen - Maybe you should ask Clinton.. He had him dead to rights and let him go.
Posted by guyfrompa45
Because the CIA told him to back off from their assets - Reply to this comment
- guyfrompa45:
Whould you nuke Iran?
Where is bin Laden, Iraq, Iran or Pakistan? - Reply to this comment
http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/02/21/port.security/
2 PAST & PRESENT PRESNDENTIAL ...HYPOCRITES SO ARE (YOU)
Clinton & Bush can Give Access to USA Ports, to those that Finance ''Terorrism''
They`re White...Its Alright !!
Critics say the takeover raises security concerns, noting that two of the hijackers in the September 11, 2001, attacks on New York and Washington came from the UAE and that the hijackers drew funds from bank accounts in Dubai, the financial center of the Persian Gulf.
But a port security expert said security fears are based on "Bigotry" Against Arabs.
"This whole notion that Dubai is going to control or set standards for U.S. ports is a canard," said Kim Petersen, head of SeaSecure, a U.S.-based maritime security company, and executive director of the Maritime Security Council, which represents 70 percent of the world`s ocean shipping.
The agreement is scheduled to take effect March 2. It was approved by the federal Committee on Foreign Investments in the United States, which includes representatives of the FBI, Pentagon and Treasury, Commerce and Homeland Security departments.
Dubai Ports World recently acquired the British-based firm that currently directs commercial operations at those ports, Peninsular and Oriental Steam Navigation. The takeover by Dubai Ports World means that it will be in charge of those operations.- Reply to this comment
- guyfrompa45:
Why can''t you answer the questions? You seem to fancy yourself so. - Reply to this comment
- "Why do you thin Iran took hostages with Carter in office. Becuase they knew he was soft..." Posted by guyfrompa45
History was not your strong suit, was it?
Iran had just deposed the Shah, who was the brutal US puppet, and the people were very angry at US attempts to keep his regime in power against their will. the Americans there should have had the common sense to get out of a country under those circumstances, yet arrogantly choose to ignore the angry mobs. They were lucky they weren''t torn to shreds, and I don''t care if you have the most staunch war hawk in office in the US, the pot was boiling, and the people would not be denied.
The hostages were taken because they were where they didn''t belong, wrong place, wrong time, period. - Reply to this comment
