Comments on: McCain: Most Troops Can Be Home By 2013
GOP Candidate Outlines Vision For First Term Says Iraq War Can Be Won, Osama Bin Laden Dead Or Caught
- McBush is a sad sad, senile fogey. It is such a comment on the failed GOP and conservative movement that this bozo is their candidate. A war-mongering loser who is frankly anti-American. What has he said good yet, anything? God help us with this kind of scum.
- Reply to this comment
- Okay sounds like the same from the democratic contenders with a little different window dressing, remember Obama and Hillary both said that they could not have all the troops home by the end of their first term. And none of the three have addressed our nations problems, its dependence on foreign energy when we can convert any auto to run off of natural gas,propane, methane, hydro etc and create American jobs.
- Reply to this comment
- Does Cindy McCain''s INSISTENCE that HER investments/taxes/financial decisions are "private" and "will never be released" mean that SHE HAS NO INTENTION to MOVE INTO the Whitehouse or REMAIN WITH John or just that THEY WILL LIVE SEPARATELY to AVOID possible "problems" with potential ILLEGAL MISUSE of "insider information"?
- Reply to this comment
- If we stay in Iraq, in 2013, IEDs and suicide bombers will still be killing our troops, guaranteed.
McBush is giving us fantasy talk when he has no plan that would ever get us out of Iraq.
Remember: In 2003, McBush said, "It%u2019s clear that the end is very much in sight." [ABC, 4/9/03]
It''s been clear for years now that McBush doesn''t know what he''s talking about when he talks about Iraq. - Reply to this comment
- And the FINAL 2013 "prediction" - McSame''s Wife FINALLY releases her FINANCIAL INFORMATION outlining all the GENOCIDE and WAR and "SIN" PROFITEERING in "her" portfolio that somehow SUPPORTS yet is "private, off-limits and separate".
GREAT SCAM THERE - INSIDER INFO that''s USABLE FOR PROFIT but "secret" because of a supposed "pre-nup. Was she PLANNING A DIVORCE BEFORE they were married?
Gotta admit THAT EVEN BEATS the Cheney/Haliburton "trust fund" excuse that it''s "separate" and therefore NOT PROFITEERING - TECHNICALLY.
Gotta LOVE those LOOPHOLES for JUST the 100 MILLION PLUS NEOCON ELITE CLUB.
How else were they supposed to VASTLY INCREASE the WEALTH GAP? - Reply to this comment
- Wait until the american people find out that Osama bin
Laden DIED in 2001. This is why Bush commented he is
not worried about Bin Laden. Bush needs to keep the
boogeyman alive so he can continue all these wars for
his rich buddies. - Reply to this comment
- McCain is such a friggin MORON..............
- Reply to this comment
- Kagan is simply a f*ckin fool who doesn''t seem to care that the U.S. needs to fix the RepubliCon b*llshit in Afghanistan and Iraq, now he''s using Russia as an excuse to invade Iran.
In fact, he''s says that there was no real proof of WMD''s in Iraq, but he used Bill Clinton''s name and administration at least six times to justify not only the invaision, but to NeoCon continued delusion of American unilateral, interventionalistic posture to "foster democracy to the world and spread freedom to every corner on the universe. - Reply to this comment
- Listening to Robert Kagan on Charlie Rose and he''s even more sickening than his f*cken brother, Frederick.
"We we''re wrong in how we used the military." in the invaision of Iraq. PNAC and the other "j*ck*ss, neoCon stink tanks covering their ****s with either jokes or dumb Bill Kristol smirks. Weakass, fat, old men who''ll send young men to fight for whatever they''ve tricked themselves and the nation''s leaders.
This jerk is John McBush''s foreign policy adviser and at this moment is eeking out a twisted intelletual exercise as to how we should force Myanmar to accept aide because even if the "west" is wrong, the west is still righter than you. - Reply to this comment
- "The Iraq war has been won," McCain said, anticipating a key achievement of his administration.
Deja vu all over again!! McCain is declaring the Iraq war victory FIVE YEARS INTO THE FUTURE?? Didn''t Bush declare victory in Iraq five years in the past?
So, in effect, McCain is saying it''s going to be "TEM YEAR WAR?"
Well, I fell sorrow for the family and friends of the NEXT 4000+ U.S. military members who will die there in the next five years.
Obviously Bush doesn''t and McCain won''t feel sorry.
It''s all about the oil, stupid... American blood for oil. - Reply to this comment
- If only McCain''s sanity would come home by then.
- Reply to this comment
- If only McCain''s sanity would come home by then.
- Reply to this comment
- This guy''s a joke. How did he come up with 2013? How does he know what''s going to happen between now and then? He doesn''t even know what''s going to happen six months from now.
The guy''s just trying to make up for his 100 year remark by throwing out some made-up number out of thin air. - Reply to this comment
- Oh boy. Ten more Freidman Units (FUs).
- Reply to this comment
- FIVE MILES of End-To-End dead US Troop coffins, from a War based on deliberate LIES.
Massive Death and Destruction in Iraq - a couple hundred thousand DEAD. Civilians - women and children - being blown to bits day after day.
Renegade Blackwater mercenaries shooting up civilians, making 6 times the pay as our troops.
Pathetic health care for our returning troops
Tax Cuts for the Filthy Rich
Our Jobs Being Sent Overseas
$4.00/gallon gas while the Oil companies made $100 BILLION in pure profits last year alone.
Abu Gharib, torture, constitution shredding
Skyrocketing wealth gap
NINE TRILLION dollar National Debt and a sinking dollar
All this f**king Nightmare is the Bush Legacy. And now idiot Americans want "More of the Same with John McCain" - Reply to this comment
- McCain is so full of sh*t! So how is that the Bush Nightmare couldn''t get Osama in 7 years, but now a new BullSh*t Cowboy wants to be the new War President and somehow this A**hole is going to get the job done??
If the American people fall for this f**king BS, they deserve 4 more years of Bush. SICK - Reply to this comment
- While I don''t necessarily argue with calling Iraq a war in a generic, loosely termed, down home and totally incorrect fashion a war by definition has a defined country as an enemy. We have watered the word down by using it to descrbe a "war on drugs" or a "war on poverty". Iraq is not by definition a war. If it is, tell me who we are fighting; an dno fair saying terrorists as believ ethey exist in Saudi Arabia, England, Iran, and even the good ole US of A. This is part of the problem. Some Americans are ignorant of what we are really involved in and still think Iraq was involved in 911, when even bush himself no longer claims that.
- Reply to this comment
- It is clear that we cannot maintain the surge for the many years it would require for the civil war to burn itself out. We need to start thinking about how to disenguage our armed forces sothat they will be able to enguage in areas of the world that effect our vital interests.(Pakistan comes to mind)
Invading aother country to avenge a murder plot onn your father does not qualify as a vital iterest - Reply to this comment
- Thru his crystal ball McBush says, "Violence still occurs, but it is spasmodic and much reduced."
If a suicide bomber happens in to the cafe where you are enjoying tea, there is another, perhaps spasmodically safer one on just down the boulevard. Thay also have fine pastries there too! And 22 patron-safe days in a row and counting. BOOM!
OOOOps. - Reply to this comment
- I must be the dumb one of the bunch. FIVE more years and we should find some comfort in that? We won WWII in less than that!
- Reply to this comment
Mike Huckabee on GOP "rock stars," 2012, health care reform and more.



