Comments on: Obama Erases Clinton's Superdelegate Lead
Illinois Senator Surpasses Hillary's Once-Imposing Lead Among Democratic Party Leaders
Add a Comment See all 3437 Comments
- Youth will be Served in...November
Drop Out John and allow your Young Fine A$$ Wife Cindy McCain to Run for President of the USA and I will be the 1st in Line to Vote for her !!
Otherthan that, John McCain, Your A$$ is Lawn Grass, come November !!!
Its Cindy McCain for USA President or I`m Voting for the Young Charismatic Illinois Senator ...
Barack Obama in (08) !!
PS: I can`t wait to see John McCain have a Senior Moment, where he loses his Thoughts during a Debate, or Worse, McCain Falls Asleep during a Debate.
Also Having Joe Liberman as a VP Running Mate, that Little Bozo Clown of a Man, is Always Around, Whispering to McCain, just keeping him in Check...
Just Like McCain`s Middle East Tour, I mean McCain`s Mid Eastern Dibacle, that was suppose to make McCain Look More Internationally Seasoned ...Ha !!
What a Laugh Riot !!! - Reply to this comment
- You see a man that LIES and says he will not be influenced by special interests, and then swills himself in money from oil and gas executives, and then votes for *** Cheney''s energy bill, to me is just another BUSH! Only worse!
- Reply to this comment
- have to say, that I have been posting that video
"Hillary Clinton Exposed!!!2" on these blogs since about mid February--the transparency of her lies and willingness to contradict herself with a straight face despite video, was well known even before her infamous Bosnia lies. LMAO
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by b-easy63 at 11:37 AM : May 12, 2008
Well, I have to say that I have posting YouTubes of Obama saying he''s for nuclear power plants, and then he''s not for nuclear power plants for MONTHS!
And I''ve been posting the video of him telling exactly how he plans to disarm this country and leave us totally vulnerable, in the hate filled world that Bush has created.
But you never saw those did ya? - Reply to this comment
- When thinking of or analyzing why Obama or any other candidate reverses what they say about attacking others or meeting with others, etc--we should not forget who did it all first on the very same issues--HRC. Hate to admit it, but one bad apple does spoil the whole bunch eventually, before its over, Obama and McCain may even be dodging imagined sniper fire or telling anecdotal campaign stories embellished for the crowds. Nothing like one truly tainted and corrupt element to contaminate almost every single thing she touches.... another reason why HRC should NEVER, EVER be allowed to ruin the country. And I put the "I" in run, because Hillary is all about Hillary---her obsession with herself and her benefit to the detriment of anything or anyone around her--portends ruination. That is just a fact. LOL
Posted by b-easy63 at 11:34 AM : May 12, 2008
I have to say, that I have been posting that video
"Hillary Clinton Exposed!!!2" on these blogs since about mid February--the transparency of her lies and willingness to contradict herself with a straight face despite video, was well known even before her infamous Bosnia lies. LMAO - Reply to this comment
- The fact is, hypothectical questions are not fair because so many variables play into what our leader will or will not do and no one can answer such a question. The key is to not come across as self righteous and indignant and proclaim what one will not do....or will do......especially if already claiming to the contrary. Or perhaps the key for all candidates is to take the advice HRC cannot follow--and don''''t answer hypothetical questions about attacking other countries and there is no way to know the answers right now. Has Obama reversed himself? probably. McCain--yes. Hillary? Oh, yes.
Guess she forgets all those interviews or it could be---when one is campaigning and saying and promising so many things and not meaning it--it is hard to keep track of or stay true to all the promises, vows and lies---right, Hillary? LOL
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by b-easy63 at 11:27 AM : May 12, 2008
The fact is that your own candidate is so basked in lying swill that your anger and personal unhappiness blind you to the reality of an Islamofascist racist making decisions for this country when he''s had exactly 143 days of experience as a US senator.
After 143 days, he thinks he''s JFK, Lincoln, FDR, and Reagan and knows more than anyone else about being our commander in chief. - Reply to this comment
- When thinking of or analyzing why Obama or any other candidate reverses what they say about attacking others or meeting with others, etc--we should not forget who did it all first on the very same issues--HRC. Hate to admit it, but one bad apple does spoil the whole bunch eventually, before its over, Obama and McCain may even be dodging imagined sniper fire or telling anecdotal campaign stories embellished for the crowds. Nothing like one truly tainted and corrupt element to contaminate almost every single thing she touches.... another reason why HRC should NEVER, EVER be allowed to ruin the country. And I put the "I" in run, because Hillary is all about Hillary---her obsession with herself and her benefit to the detriment of anything or anyone around her--portends ruination. That is just a fact. LOL
- Reply to this comment
- Has anyone seen the youtube video "Hillary Clinton Exposed!!!!2"? On that video, are excerpts from a debate where Hillary states she does not believe in discussing what she will do and not do as President, but then she goes on to say she will NOT meet with any of the enemies of the US during the first year when she is in office--it is juxtaposed with an NBC clip of her interview with Keith Olbermann,earlier, in which she is asked would she meet unconditionally with Iran, Syria and other US enemies immediately upon becoming President. Her answer: ABSOLUTELY.
She does the same turnaround when asked about bombing Pakistan: claims she does not answer such questions, does anyway and contradicts an interview where she says she WOULD bomb Pakistan if chasing Al Qaeda or other terrorists. Does the same thing about Nuclear weapons. What does this mean? Is Hillary just a liar who will say anything? Or is she stupid and does not remember earlier interviews or what?
next post
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by b-easy63 at 11:27 AM : May 12, 2008
Seems like I remember you saying you didn''t need to see Obama''s videotapes on YouTube. So now you''re a YouTube fan when it comes to Hillary Clinton!
As long as it''s against Hillary Clinton any source is viable, of course unless it''s Obama and his lying swill, then you choose to ignore it. - Reply to this comment
- The fact is, hypothectical questions are not fair because so many variables play into what our leader will or will not do and no one can answer such a question. The key is to not come across as self righteous and indignant and proclaim what one will not do....or will do......especially if already claiming to the contrary. Or perhaps the key for all candidates is to take the advice HRC cannot follow--and don''t answer hypothetical questions about attacking other countries and there is no way to know the answers right now. Has Obama reversed himself? probably. McCain--yes. Hillary? Oh, yes.
Guess she forgets all those interviews or it could be---when one is campaigning and saying and promising so many things and not meaning it--it is hard to keep track of or stay true to all the promises, vows and lies---right, Hillary? LOL - Reply to this comment
- Has anyone seen the youtube video "Hillary Clinton Exposed!!!!2"? On that video, are excerpts from a debate where Hillary states she does not believe in discussing what she will do and not do as President, but then she goes on to say she will NOT meet with any of the enemies of the US during the first year when she is in office--it is juxtaposed with an NBC clip of her interview with Keith Olbermann,earlier, in which she is asked would she meet unconditionally with Iran, Syria and other US enemies immediately upon becoming President. Her answer: ABSOLUTELY.
She does the same turnaround when asked about bombing Pakistan: claims she does not answer such questions, does anyway and contradicts an interview where she says she WOULD bomb Pakistan if chasing Al Qaeda or other terrorists. Does the same thing about Nuclear weapons. What does this mean? Is Hillary just a liar who will say anything? Or is she stupid and does not remember earlier interviews or what?
next post - Reply to this comment
- No smart a/s/s comebacks on why your candidate lied about his own statements, B-easy?
C''''mon, I thought you were educated enough to spot lies.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by RowdyTexan2 at 11:18 AM : May 12, 2008
Seems like you''re not as educated as you think you are, B-easy. Seems like you''re so blind in your own hate and anger that a so-called educated person like you accusses everyone else of being a pawn and can''t see a lie right in their face...but a so-called educated person like you is either so hateful and bias or just plain dumb that you either can''t spot a lie, or you just REFUSE to see it, because might have to admit your racist Islmofascit candidate has some really really bad flaws and is in fact pawning the American people with his gas bag lying swill. - Reply to this comment
- No smart a/s/s comebacks on why your candidate lied about his own statements, B-easy?
C''mon, I thought you were educated enough to spot lies. - Reply to this comment
- And You, Adore The Clinton`s..Puh-Lease !!
Just Admit You don`t want a Bi-Racial Male in the Oval Office...
Bigots !!
Note: The Clinton`s: Arab Money & Oil Money
Hillary Clinton`s Finance Chairman is a (Iranian)
The Clintons`s recieve 10 Million Dollars per year from the Royal Saudi Arabian families.
The (500 Million $) Bill Clinton Library is Chaired by Saudi Arabians..Duh
The Last time I checked, those (911-Terrorist Attacks) were from (Saudi Arabia)
Bill Clinton`s Big Millions from his Partnership with the United Arab Emirates, (Dubai Ports Deal)
A partnership, Bill will only give up, IF Hillary Clinton is Voted in as President..
Bill says (IF) Hillary becomes President !!
The last time I checked the (United Arab Emirates) also Participated in the (911-Terrorist Attacks) !!
I Guess if you`re White...
Its alright to Profit off American Blood and not have SHAME about it..At All !!!
Thats the Clinton Brand...
Money Rules Everything Around Me...
I`m a Capitalist 1st...
American Pride & Honor ZERO - Reply to this comment
- others are so full of self hate, doubt, anger, insecurity and negativity themselves--that they actually run to the negatives so they can have validation for their own hateful feelings."
Most pundits, news sources and persons in both parties agree that HRC has run the most negative campaign thus far....what does that say about the people who support her? What is it about such a campaign that continually appeals to a you and garners your loyalty and support? What exactly are you validating by HRC''s tactics and rhetoric?
We know by now, why neo cons support Bush and why they have the mindset that they do (or at least we have an unwanted a long glimpse into that moral abyss) but now, it''s your turn with your goblin. What about Hillary Clinton and her campaign validates YOU?
Wait--no need to answer that for us--answer it for yourself. - Reply to this comment
- Direct International negoiations are as Common as water Flowing Down Stream...
Its been Done and will continue to Happen, its called International Affairs.
I`m glad will have a President willing to Communicate, otherthan the (UN) & Secretary Of State...
The Hands On Approach will be Needed.
Note: The Missiles of October...
John F. Kennedy was Hands on in this Crisis, He and his Brother Robert F. Kennedy ...
Nothing New...Nothing New !! - Reply to this comment
- What do you think about Obama''''''''s campaign coming out and saying he never said he would meet unconditionally with Iran''''''''s leader and Hamas...when his very clear statesments are videotaped and anyone with a brain can go look it up!
What kind of pawn game is he trying to pull now to covere up his totally bad judgment on a very serious issue?
----------------------------------
----------------------------------------
------
Posted by RowdyTexan2 at 11:05 AM : May 12, 2008
Got any critical analysis on his totally lying and trying to pawn the American people with his lies, B-easy? Let''''s here one of your three-page rants on why he totally lied?
C''mon, B-easy, I want your critical analysis on why Obama instructed his campaign people to try to lie his way out of this situation. McCain called him on those statements, and Obama''s campaign totally lied and said he never made those statements! It''s on videotape everywhere that he made those statement?
I want to hear your critical analysis on why Obama''s trying to lie and distort his own statements? - Reply to this comment
- " others are so full of self hate, doubt, anger, insecurity and negativity themselves--that they actually run to the negatives so they can have validation for their own hateful feelings."
Look closely at Hillary. When she lies continually, or breaks pledges and makes excuses for doing so, when she refuses to pay her debts so that her creditors can move on, when she knows her campaign undermines the DNC chances but still continues and splits her own party, when she uses race, money or class to try to split up Americans to support her, when she makes statements about killing others or justifying poor choices and they do not say simply that she was wrong--what does it say about her? When she has a myriad of cases of questionable dealings with pardons for terrorist organizations, drug criminals, etc, when she steals items from the White house, lies about NAFTA, has a husband making money from CAFTA, takes a lot of money from insurance companies and the health care industry all the while pretending she is interested in health care for the public''s benefit, when she persists in living in lala land finding new ways to win, even if it means she will cheat, when she ignores so many distrusting and disliking her and presses on thinking they will vote for her....When she is caught lying on video, then lies about her lying then lies about her lies about her lying...what does it say about her? More importantly, what does it say about the people who support her? - Reply to this comment
- What do you think about Obama''''s campaign coming out and saying he never said he would meet unconditionally with Iran''''s leader and Hamas...when his very clear statesments are videotaped and anyone with a brain can go look it up!
What kind of pawn game is he trying to pull now to covere up his totally bad judgment on a very serious issue?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by RowdyTexan2 at 11:05 AM : May 12, 2008
Got any critical analysis on his totally lying and trying to pawn the American people with his lies, B-easy? Let''s here one of your three-page rants on why he totally lied? - Reply to this comment
- What do you think about Obama''s campaign coming out and saying he never said he would meet unconditionally with Iran''s leader and Hamas...when his very clear statesments are videotaped and anyone with a brain can go look it up!
What kind of pawn game is he trying to pull now to covere up his totally bad judgment on a very serious issue? - Reply to this comment
- Of course, there are always those who are led by instinct--which is always tied to emotionalism. Even for Obama''s camp that is true. But if one is led by emotionalism, let it be for the positive. That means for positive things like hope or change or a better day.
Beware any person who moves you by appealing to the negatives in you or your environment--that is evil. To use fear, hatred, racism, differences or to continually castigate to get you to their side is questionable--negativity is the trait people exploit when they have no or few positives to tout.
As my mom used to say, when a person is constantly criticizing or putting others down, don''t look at who they are pointing at, look at them--because the larger problem is there. A person who runs mostly on negatives does so---because they have few positives to run on. That is just a fact. Some people know this and shy away from the negative candidate, others are so full of self hate, doubt, anger, insecurity and negativity themselves--that they actually run to the negatives so they can have validation for their own hateful feelings.
Never trust any person who tries to win anything by constantly putting others down or criticizing. People running for office do that, when they don''t want you to look closely at them. - Reply to this comment
- is not the rhetoric--it is seeing the game and seeing the intent. In that, intelligent people shun HRC like the plague. But the uneducated, can''''t see beyond where she leads them and what she tells them. Because they don''''t even know that a game is being played and that they are IN the game--as pawns.
Posted by b-easy63 at 10:36 AM : May 12, 2008
Bull *****! Pawns like you don''t even have the capacity to call your own candidate on his lying swill! Then you claim you are intelligent? That you are educated? When all you can do is honk on sniper fire!
Give me a break! Average Americans have more sense than you do and can spot a lying shill any day of the week. You haven''t even a clue! - Reply to this comment
