Comments on: Clinton: Wright "Offensive And Outrageous"

In Interview, Dem Candidate Says Voters Will Decide How Controversy Over Obama's Former Pastor Affects Race

[brianbwb-2009]

The fact that Wright is right doesn''t even get any mention, and even if Wright is wrong, no one seems able to show how.

[brianbwb-2009]

Even the article itself calls the reverend "divisive", and such claptrap, but fails to show the inaccuracies.

[vmcneal2]

In a letter endorsing Obama on April 21, 2008, Michael Moore, Academy Award-winning filmmaker of such documentaries as Fahrenheit 9/11 and Sicko, stated:

%u201CMrs. Clinton continues to throw the Rev. Wright up in his face as part of her mission to keep stoking the fears of White America. Every time she does this I shout at the TV, %u2018Say it, Obama! Say that when she and her husband were having marital difficulties regarding Monica Lewinsky, who did she and Bill bring to the White House for %u2018spiritual counseling?%u2019 The Reverend Jeremiah Wright!

The Clintons are so full of Sh*t

[brianbwb-2009]

Posted by gameoverdems

Lots of disrespect for the Reverend from your keyboard, but not one word showing how what the reverend says is not true.

Sure it is 60-ish, but since the same problem still exists, it still merits at least discussion.

Unless in your very small intellect, you wish to posit that racism no longer exists...

[libra127]

Funny how this hypocritical, lying, underhanded political B*I*T*C*H says nothing about her husband''''s seeking Rev. Wright''s counsel and mentoring when his sorry A*S*S* was being raked over the coals for the Lewinsky debacle...how about that Hillary? You did''t mind the Rev''s input then.

Posted by kittykatty2 at 08:53 AM : May 01, 2008

Huh ??? She was responding to a specific question that Bill O''Reilly asked her in an interview. She was asked specifically about her feelings concerning Rev. Wright''s recent statements at the National Press Club. Guess you didn''t watch the interview, kittykat.

[kittykatty2]

Funny how this hypocritical, lying, underhanded political B*I*T*C*H says nothing about her husband''s seeking Rev. Wright''s counsel and mentoring when his sorry A*S*S* was being raked over the coals for the Lewinsky debacle...how about that Hillary? You didn''t mind the Rev''s input then.

[vmcneal2]

1995: Pres. Clinton Endorses Louis Farrakhan
cnn.com %u2014 What do we make of then-President Bill Clinton publicly endorsing the 1995 Million Man March? Who called for that march? Louis Farrakhan. Who was the lead organizer? Louis Farrakhan. Who was the keynote speaker? Louis Farrakhan. Did Sen. Clinton privately or publicly rebuke her husband for supporting a man she has determined to be hateful

Funny, nobody is talking about this.

[janzee114]

Hypocrisy? Some people may have found Bill Clinton''s numerous public humiliation of his wife (Gennifer Flowers, Monica Lewinsky) "offensive and outrageous." But her marriage is her personal business. Just like where you go to church. Look at the Catholic Church and all the negative press they have rightfully gotten. Do we now hang all Catholics out to dry? Are they all "offensive and outrageous? Will keeping the Wright issue alive bring down the cost of a gallon of gas?

[mikeant50]

Hillary lost my vote a long time ago. Every time I hear people like James Carvile and Lanny Davis, I donate another 50 dollars to Obama. Wasn''t Bill O''Reilly and the rest of his FOX cronies the one who spent 8 years destroying the Clintons as Hillary puts it. Wasn''t he part of that vast Right Wing Conspiracy that Hillary spoke of. Hillary again has proven to me that she will do anything to get this nomination and the Republicans are now her best friends. Nothing will solidify the Conservatives more that having the Clintons as the Democratic nominee.

[jack3213]

IT IS QUITE OBVIOUS THAT WOMEN FAVOR CLINTON AND BLACKS FAVOR OBAMA, LETS NOT DENY THAT. WHO FAVORS INTELLIGENCE, CREDIBILITY, AND EXPERIANCE? --THOSE WHO FAVOR MCCAIN...AND THERE CERTAINLY ARE ALOT OF WOMEN AND BLACKS WHO SEE THAT, TOO. FOR THOSE WHO BELIEVE THINGS WILL "CHANGE" --DAY ONE-- IF A DEMOCRAT WERE ELECTED SHOULD KNOW THAT WITH A DEMOCRAT DAY ONE MIGHT CHANGE SOMETHING AND THAT SOMETHING IS: HIGHER TAXES, GREATER SECURITY RISK, UNACCEPTABLE HEALTH INSURANCE, AND A WEAKER ECONOMY- NOT A STRONGER ONE- ( HOW CAN BE IT STRONGER IF YOU HAVE TO PAY HIGHER TAXES IN 2008-20012? THIS ISN''T THE 1990''S- TIME TO GET OVER THAT FACT ) IF VOTING FOR CLINTON OR OBAMA SIMPLY BECAUSE OF THEIR GENDER OR RACE OR THINKING THEY ARE THE ANSWERS TO ALL OF YOUR PROBLEMS YOU ARE IN FOR A VERY RUDE AWAKENING. SORRY.