Comments on: Electoral Map Favors Democrats This Fall

Downtrodden Economy, War, And Public Mood For Change From Bush Pose Enormous Challenges For GOP

[truthyness]

Obama is putting the last nail in his coffin by refusing to debate Hillary. It looks like its going to be McCain and Hillary after all.

[perceptions5]

How can the Dumocrats win in November when they only recognize 48 US states and the territories of Michigan and Florida?

........sorry election goes to the GOP.

[ontheleft]

The Democrats should have the upcoming election in the bag. All the planets are aligned for them. But I don''t think they''re going to pull it off. The current polls of Obama or Clinton vs. McCain show the race to be within a percentage point or two.

That pretty much spells doom for the Democrats. The same fear mongering that was successful in 2004 will be used again. There goes the 1-2% lead. This is all so predictable.

[rowdytexan2]

It isn''''t going to matter in the end since the MI and FL fiasco is so FUBAR that they only way its gonna be resolved is by awarding the delegates in a fair way that both campaigns agree to.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by melchg at 07:54 PM : Apr 26, 2008

Exactly! Why do you think HIllary is not willing to just willy nilly let him have 50% of those delegates?

She knows exactly what she''s doing!

[rowdytexan2]

Posted by melchg at 07:47 PM : Apr 26, 2008

The thing is, it''s not going to be up to those states. It''s going to have to be ruled on by the DNC when he tries to claim delegates from those states at the convention.

The core democrats will contest it! You can bet your shiney nickel on that.

[rowdytexan2]

The Democratic Party chairs in Iowa, New Hampshire, and Nevada have not weighed in on Obama''''s national cable buy. Having already held their contests, the state party chairs in those three early states are deferring to the South Carolina Democratic Party. "


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by melchg at 07:43 PM : Apr 26, 2008

What the hell does the S. Carolina democratic chairman have to do with DNC sanction???

You see that''s the problem with a shill like Obama.

He went out and asked one person what they THOUGHT about his campaign ads. He certainly didn''t ask for a DNC ruling!

Then he goes out and spreads it that the DNC said he wasn''t in violation!

He will twist and distort and lie and you people just believe his *****!

[rowdytexan2]

While the Obama campaign has not been defended by the D.N.C., his campaign was told by Carol Fowler, the chairwoman of the South Carolina Democratic Party, that she did not consider a national cable buy to be in violation of the pledge made to South Carolina. "

Where does it state in the article that he WAS in violation of the pledge?


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by melchg at 07:40 PM : Apr 26, 2008

I was speaking to your and Obama''s lies that the DNC had ruled his national ads as not violating the rules!

I knew it was baloney!

Only one state democratic chairman TOLD him she THOUGHT it wasn''t a violation!

There hasn''t been a rule or a decision on it from the DNC!

[rowdytexan2]

The fact is, the DNC has NOT ruled on it deliberately becaue no one has in the party has contested it YET!

But they certainly will if the DNC tries to give Obama ANY of the delegates out of Florida and Michigan!

The core democrats will contest and force a ruling!

[rowdytexan2]

http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalradar/2008/01/obama-wrong-abo.html

Of course you didn''t hear it! You, like every other Obama supporter just take his word for his *****!

[hungryman9]

think I will retire from here tonight. You folks have already put a Republican in office.
The race problem is worse today than it was in the 50''s.