Comments on: Dean: Superdelegates Should Pick By July 1

Democratic Party Chief Tells CBS News That Dems Need To Unite, Avoid A Brokered Convention

Add a Comment See all 146 Comments
by crusherking March 28, 2008 5:19 PM EDT
In fact SgtRds,

Here is an article that covers just a few of the facts that Clinton officials were aware of.

http://www.nationalreview.com/nr_

comment/nr_comment042903.asp

Posted by crusherking at 02:08 PM : Mar 28, 2008

Lesson number one never, ever, ever believe anything in the National Review.

Posted by SgtRDS

Oh.. right. Not in line with SgtRDS''s opinion=conspiracy theory. Laughable..
Reply to this comment
by jockh March 28, 2008 5:11 PM EDT
HILLARY CLINTON %u2026 READY TO DESTROY DEMOCRATS CHANCES OF WINNING
Hillary trails Obama by every measure, and it''s obvious to everyone that she has virtually no hope of winning the nomination.

Yet the former first lady trudges on in some phantom contest oblivious to the sea of doubt around her.

She is completely unwilling to accept the cruel truth that she has been rejected by her own party.
She was first lady, for cryin'' out loud! She is the queen of this party!
No one she trusts has the courage to tell her she''s done, much less force her into the car to take her home.

So on we march, scandal after scandal, contest after contest, hoping with each one that she finally accepts what everyone else began realizing long ago.

And the certainty with which she recalled all that sniper fire raining down on her as she ran out after landing in Bosnia 12 years ago convinced others that she''s nearly gone out of her mind.

She has become disassociated from reality leading many to believe she''s staying in the race only to damage Obama so badly that he can''t win in November, thus leaving the Democratic ticket open for her to run again in 2012.
Reply to this comment
by sgtrds March 28, 2008 5:10 PM EDT
In fact SgtRds,

Here is an article that covers just a few of the facts that Clinton officials were aware of.

http://www.nationalreview.com/nr_
comment/nr_comment042903.asp

Posted by crusherking at 02:08 PM : Mar 28, 2008

Lesson number one never, ever, ever believe anything in the National Review.
Reply to this comment
by crusherking March 28, 2008 5:08 PM EDT
In fact SgtRds,

Here is an article that covers just a few of the facts that Clinton officials were aware of.

http://www.nationalreview.com/nr_comment/nr_comment042903.asp
Reply to this comment
by jack3213 March 28, 2008 5:05 PM EDT
IGNORANCE IS NOT AN EXCUSE FOR CHANGE. ACHIEVEMENTS AND ACCOMPLISHMENTS SPOKEN MONTHS LATER IS A WEAK CANDIDATES DESPERATE ATTEMPT TO WIN VOTES WHEN CREDIBILITY HAD ITS TIME AND PLACE. TOO LITTLE TOO LATE. THE WHITE WOMAN IS A FRAUD AND THE BLACK MAN IS NOT QUALIFIED SIMPLY BECAUSE HE GIVES A GOOD SPEECH.
Reply to this comment
by crusherking March 28, 2008 5:02 PM EDT
Well McVet, Clinton should have taken out OBL, he had the chance and the intel and chose to do NOTHING.

Posted by crusherking at 01:52 PM : Mar 28, 2008

The above is what''''s known as a lie. The idea that Clinton had any real chance to get Bin Laden but failed to do so is one of the right wings most cherished myths. It''''s simply not true.

Posted by SgtRDS

No sir.. Its historical fact... In fact I have debated this with many of your comrades on these boards and none have disputed the fact until you. Do the research. The truth is out there, you just haven''t found it yet.
Reply to this comment
by crusherking March 28, 2008 5:00 PM EDT
On the upside it does give one a comical mental picture of Bush and Cheney in leather garter belts and cut-out bras being whipped by Condi Rice and Jeff Gannon.

;-0


Posted by SgtRDS

Didn''t realize that stuff excited you... why is your mouth wide open btw?
Reply to this comment
by sgtrds March 28, 2008 4:58 PM EDT
Well McVet, Clinton should have taken out OBL, he had the chance and the intel and chose to do NOTHING.

Posted by crusherking at 01:52 PM : Mar 28, 2008

The above is what''s known as a lie. The idea that Clinton had any real chance to get Bin Laden but failed to do so is one of the right wings most cherished myths. It''s simply not true.
Reply to this comment
by crusherking March 28, 2008 4:55 PM EDT
''''m not being optomistic you moron, I''''m being realistic. About 2/3''''s of the country is sick of this war and want an end to it....I''''m being realistic when I say that if there isn''''t major improvements in Iraq by November its over for McCain...since that has been what his top platform for running on.

Posted by melchg

No idiot, you are being optimistic.
Reply to this comment
by crusherking March 28, 2008 4:52 PM EDT
Oh come on! The Economy is in the crapper, Bin Laden is in a Safe Haven in Pakistan, we''''re spending 28 Billion on a war we were told would last 6 months and is entering its 6th year? I could go on for another hour but how much failure is enough. Can you name something ANYTHING the Republican''''s made better in the 6 years they were in power? You do know that McCain is a leader of that failure don''''t you? Sieg Heil Bush.

Posted by MCVet

Well McVet, Clinton should have taken out OBL, he had the chance and the intel and chose to do NOTHING. Clinton also forced NAFTA down our throats and made it easier for companies to send US jobs overseas. So don''t go around acting like its Bush''s fault alone. Your Democratic Congress has done Squat so I don''t see where you think you have the moral high ground.
Reply to this comment
by sgtrds March 28, 2008 4:51 PM EDT
Yes, Sgt. I think you''''re right. Just so long as it''''s painful to someone/thing and it hurts. Matters not if it''''s legal, against Geneva Conventions, whatever. We just gotta see that blood and guts flowing somewhere and anywhere pretty much is okay.

Geez!!

Posted by janiet3 at 01:43 PM : Mar 28, 2008

On the upside it does give one a comical mental picture of Bush and Cheney in leather garter belts and cut-out bras being whipped by Condi Rice and Jeff Gannon.

;-0
Reply to this comment
by mcvet March 28, 2008 4:50 PM EDT
Yeah, but the lefties always get away with it now don''''t they? My favorite lefty waterborder is Teddy FatAzz Kennedy. Still up there running the show, now isn''''t he. He''''s what you call "soft" violence.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by mudrose at 01:43 PM : Mar 28, 2008
+ report abuse

What''s all this "lefty" stuff Sparky! YOU losers have been in charge of the Government.. had it completely for 6 years so dazzle us with the success... that''s how it''s supposed to work you know. Sieg Heil Bush!! ROFLMAO Good luck with that one!!
Reply to this comment
by mcvet March 28, 2008 4:49 PM EDT
Dean is right. The Democrat''s need to get this over with and the canidate who doesn''t get the nod should step up and support the winner. It''s a long way to November and the Nazi''s will be looking as hard as they can for a wedge issue. We need to start to bring up the record of failure of this Administration and the Republican Party. Give the Democrat President a solid Majority in Both Houses and lets see what they can do! If they accomplish ANYTHING at all it''ll be better than the Republican''s.
Reply to this comment
by mcvet March 28, 2008 4:45 PM EDT
So you are saying that your only hope to get one of these Dems elected is for more violence in Iraq.. You are certainly optimistic about the possibility of more deaths and violence there.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by crusherking at 01:40 PM : Mar 28, 2008
+ report abuse

Oh come on! The Economy is in the crapper, Bin Laden is in a Safe Haven in Pakistan, we''re spending 28 Billion on a war we were told would last 6 months and is entering its 6th year? I could go on for another hour but how much failure is enough. Can you name something ANYTHING the Republican''s made better in the 6 years they were in power? You do know that McCain is a leader of that failure don''t you? Sieg Heil Bush.
Reply to this comment
by janiet3 March 28, 2008 4:43 PM EDT
It does sound like the right wing is into an S and M sort of thing doesn''''t it? I think that''''s why they like torture so much too. They get off on it.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes, Sgt. I think you''re right. Just so long as it''s painful to someone/thing and it hurts. Matters not if it''s legal, against Geneva Conventions, whatever. We just gotta see that blood and guts flowing somewhere and anywhere pretty much is okay.

Geez!!
Reply to this comment
by mudrose-2009 March 28, 2008 4:43 PM EDT
It does sound like the right wing is into an S and M sort of thing doesn''''t it? I think that''''s why they like torture so much too. They get off on it.
Posted by SgtRDS

Yeah, but the lefties always get away with it now don''t they? My favorite lefty waterborder is Teddy FatAzz Kennedy. Still up there running the show, now isn''t he. He''s what you call "soft" violence.
Reply to this comment
by mcvet March 28, 2008 4:42 PM EDT

Old man senile and a lot more of his generation could still kick your butt. Only difference is you won''''t see it coming. Hahahahaha. Jerk.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by mudrose at 01:31 PM : Mar 28, 2008
+ report abuse

Oh PLEASE! I watched McCain attempting to explain his position on Iraq. HE honestly didn''t know sunni from shiite. Then he made the same blunder again a few days later. We already have an Idiot, we sure do not need someone who will fall asleep and drool when getting reports. He hasn''t a clue about the economy either. McCain will be a no show... Sieg Heil Bush
Reply to this comment
by sgtrds March 28, 2008 4:40 PM EDT
You, or senile old he, had better not come anywhere close to my butt. You got that? Warmongerers both of you. Just love that violence now don''''t you?

Posted by janiet3 at 01:37 PM : Mar 28, 2008

It does sound like the right wing is into an S and M sort of thing doesn''t it? I think that''s why they like torture so much too. They get off on it.
Reply to this comment
by crusherking March 28, 2008 4:40 PM EDT
crusherking-

haha- yeah your facts are from this week, need i remind you that the GE in in NOVEMBER so these polls will likely vary a from day to day from now until then

I based my opinion on the idea that the fed and economic stimulus will work between now in the fall enough to bring about a better repoir of consumer confidence, which will likely erode people putting the economy as the number one issue....

Iraq will then once again be on voters minds as the number one issue. For a story about Basra you can check out the story on CNN''''s website. Pretty much its do or die for the Iraq PM. Everything in Iraq is heavily enforced by having a large amount of troop presence....Many iraqi''''s have been bought off by the U.S army, paying former insurgents to become Iraqi guards....this hold debacle is only being sustained by the high number of troops we have their now...Just wait and watch, the Madhi Army has already put up a resistance and pretty soon the cease fire will likely end.

Posted by melchg

So you are saying that your only hope to get one of these Dems elected is for more violence in Iraq.. You are certainly optimistic about the possibility of more deaths and violence there.
Reply to this comment
by mudrose-2009 March 28, 2008 4:40 PM EDT
You, or senile old he, had better not come anywhere close to my butt. You got that? Warmongerers both of you. Just love that violence now don''''t you?
Posted by janiet3

Well we don''t like bigots or verbal violence against old people. Seems to me you got a problem with old people? You''re an old people bigot.
Reply to this comment
See all 146 Comments
  • MOST POPULAR
Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications:

What do you think of President-elect Obama picking Hillary Clinton for his Cabinet?
 Brilliant
 Risky
 Awful