Comments on: Student Defends Lewinsky Query To Chelsea
Former First Daughter Delivered Stinging Rebuke To Question About Lewinsky Scandal At College Forum
- Jesterbelle, you HAVE to see this video. It''''s the shocking video of Bosnia that proves Hillary told the truth!!! YOu will LYAO!!
http://wonkette.com/372675/sho
cking-bosnia-video-proves-hillary-told-t
he-truth - Reply to this comment
- Providence
I agree. There has been so much mudslinging and you never kbnow what to believe. It apprears obama is a racists, i lost faith in hillary when she suggested a joint ticket, and i don''t like mcclain because i wnt us to get out of Iraq. I would hope the parties would put up someone who would run this country the way the public would like to see it run and make everyone proud to be an American again. O do not believe we need a racist of any color in the white house. So what is the answer ? I have no idea as of yet so i have done the next best thing. My daughter is serving in Iraq so i asked her what the soldiers there want to happen in this electiobn. That is how i am going to determine who i will vote for. As soon as my daughter has collected as many opinions as she can get i will let everyome know what our soldiers would like to see what happens in the coming election. - Reply to this comment
- It''s unfortunate that the Clintons have put Chelsea in this position - however, since they have and she is out there stumping for her mother then everything is fair game. If your going to pick and choose what you will respond to then anything you have to say is useless. Politics is rough business, if you can''t handle it now when all you''ve been doing is lightweight work, how can you expect to handle it as the pressure grows. It''s time for the 3 ring Clinton Circus to pack up and go home to New York - oops sorry, they really don''t live in NY, thats a political ruse too!!!!!!!!!!
- Reply to this comment
- Chelsea is an off-shoot of censorship growing. Watch her grow. Instead of boycotting this question about her parents, she should have grabbed the opportunity to banalise it, and make it a dead story. End of it. She may have had a great opportunity to say, hey, this is over, we got over it. What I doubt here, is an interpretation of a rotting hurting dormant matter will haunt her forever. Thanks to student Evan Strange for bringing it up.
- Reply to this comment
- Chelsea, has a good heart, untainted by politics so far. However, there was nothing personal about the question. The question was actually very relevant to her mother''s campaign. People/voters do consider these things, as I''m sure Bill and Hillary do. If the young man had asked her how her how the Lewinsky scandal effected her family, then it would have been personal. Chelsea''s response showed a small hint of immaturity. It made me sad for her. She should not be involved at this level. If her parents loved her as much as they loved their careers, they would make sure she was never in danger of being hit by any political weaponry. Despite the mistakes all parents make, most of us still possess a parental instinct to protect our children and to hold them in a sacred place.
- Reply to this comment
- Chelsea, has a good heart, untainted by politics so far. However, there was nothing personal about the question. The question was actually very relevant to her mother''s campaign. People/voters do consider these things, as I''m sure Bill and Hillary do. If the young man had asked her how her how the Lewinsky scandal effected her family, then it would have been personal. Chelsea''s response showed a small hint of immaturity. It made me sad for her. She should not be involved at this level. If her parents loved her as much as they loved their careers, they would make sure she was never in danger of being hit by any political weaponry. Despite the mistakes all parents make, most of us still hold our children in a sacred place.
- Reply to this comment
- Bias? She voted for the war. She was idiotic enough to believe the bogus evidence becasue she did not do her job be reading hte NIE.
Then you say I can''t see through her vote (which was fully and totally political in nature to make her look like a Maggie Thatcher or something).
You RowdyTexan can''t see your own wants for Hillary to become president. Soon, though you will be rescued by a friendly neighbor who will help you take down your wilting Hillary for President sign. It is an embarrassment to you and your neighborhood.
We need a fresh start, not more of the same war politics that Hillary seems to like so much. She''s the one that brought up her war experience in Bosnia and her grand vote for the Iraq War and then in September 07 a vote for a war with Iran.
Can you believe we are even having to talk about this? But we are...because we invaded a country in Arabia and created a disaster - just like predicted. - Reply to this comment
- How can she be competent when she voted for the war. And you even claimed yesterday or the day before that it was not her fault because she only read the executive summary. Even though the rest of the document punched many, many holes into WMD claim.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by Vet_SK at 02:22 AM : Mar 27, 2008
She like many of the legislators only read the executive summary. Why do you think 397 of them voted they way they did?
But I don''t fault her on her war vote because I understand how difficult a vote it was for her to make. She stated it clearly and precistly when she made the vote exactly what her stance was. If she had made a different decision and there was another terrorist attack. You''d now be crying out against her because she didn''t vote for it.
You will never understand her vote, unless you look at the whole picture and stop seeing your bias. It was a tremendous reponsibility to her constituents who were crying out for war, when 80% of Americans were crying for war. - Reply to this comment
- Have a great nite. Happy Friday!
- Reply to this comment
- RowdyTexan, I''''d like you to go meet with some of the families of those who have been killed or injured in Iraq and ask them what they think about going into Iraq now. I don''''t think you get it.
You like Hillary for reasons unknown because everything you write is false. Perhaps you believe it but that does not make it true.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by Vet_SK at 02:18 AM : Mar 27, 2008
I have talked to the families, Sir, we''ve lost three in our community, and I''ve been to the funerals, and know their parents well.
And yes, I obviously see a very different HIllary Clinton than you do.
But when my choice is HIllary or Obama, I will vote Hillary every time. When she discusses and issue, she state is straight out. She answers the questions because she knows it. She made the plans, months ago, posted them on her website, she can clearly define and describe them.
Obama, didn''t even make a plan until after he figured out his beat up on Hillary shill wasn''t going to work. He took Hillary''s plans and changed a couple of things. And if you read his plans, they are totally naive and prove up his inexperience.
So my vote goes to one who made the plans, who took the stance Mr. Obama echoes every time, and the one that can define them without having the answers up on a teleprompter. - Reply to this comment
Author Thomas Friedman on Obama's Afghanistan plan and the war on terror.




