Comments on: Carville Won't Apologize For Judas Remark
Clinton Adviser Compared Bill Richardson To Judas
Add a Comment See all 158 Comments
- "I''''''''m just not trying to be cute. I just have felt that an endorsement by me, I don''''''''t think it is that significant," Richardson said.
Good point Bill!!
NOBAMA 08 - Reply to this comment
- Carville is a Pompous rear end as usual and Clinton is using him just for that purpose. If she were fair and righteous she would repudiate his words.
He is a dirty trickster with a Mouth that the Grand Canyon could fit within.
It is all about the end result without consideration for the truth.
Do they feel slighted? Sure they do they figured Richardson was a shoe in because he was an appointee from the Clinton White House years. How wrong they were!
It is exactly these kinds of things and Entitlement of the Clinton which is and shows her arrogance. Being a Wife does not make a President be!
She needs to run along back to New York and hang her head and go into obscurity quickly. - Reply to this comment
- Whoever gets the nomination, the other half will have to hold their nose and vote for the other one, or else have McCain. It''s that simple.
- Reply to this comment
- As usual Mr. Carville is right on. Mr. Richardson has no loyalty to the USA either as evidenced by his welcoming attitude towards Illegal Aliens provided they are mestizos.
- Reply to this comment
- I will agree that the core Democratic base supports Hillary. They support status quo and do not want to see change. That is why progressive thinking Democrats have left the Clinton bandwagon. We want more than the same wrapped in a different paper. In addition Independants support Obama far more than Hillary. If Hillary gets the nomination the Independants will either vote McSame or not at all. Either way Hillary loses and McSame gives us 4 more years of GWB rule.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by LiberalVet at 01:49 PM : Mar 25, 2008
Progressive sounds like another buzz word that doesn''t mean krap. Obama stands for exactly the same. He commits politics as usual, he steals all his plans from Hillary, he votes the same as Hillary. So what''s he going to change? What the hell does he represent that''s different?
A buzz word you want to call progressive means change? - Reply to this comment
- Carville is such a vile little man. And Hillary claims that Obama is running a negative campaign!
Ha, that''s a hoot! - Reply to this comment
- Well SOME of the democrat, not all by even half. There''''s still half the democrats out here that are applauding James Carville''''s personal loyalty and think Richardson, all warm and fuzzy, jumped on the racial bandwagon like a chicken on a junebug.
Posted by RowdyTexan2 at 01:34 PM : Mar 25, 2008
I will agree that the core Democratic base supports Hillary. They support status quo and do not want to see change. That is why progressive thinking Democrats have left the Clinton bandwagon. We want more than the same wrapped in a different paper. In addition Independants support Obama far more than Hillary. If Hillary gets the nomination the Independants will either vote McSame or not at all. Either way Hillary loses and McSame gives us 4 more years of GWB rule. - Reply to this comment
- So Richardson realized what so many Democrats and Independants have, which is that Hillary is not the best candidate, and for that the Clinton campaign goes into smear factor on a major scale. Again they show thier true desire to rule no matter what the cost. Wake up America, we have endured 7 years of just ath type of thinking, we do not need another 4.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by LiberalVet at 01:31 PM : Mar 25, 2008
Well SOME of the democrat, not all by even half. There''s still half the democrats out here that are applauding James Carville''s personal loyalty and think Richardson, all warm and fuzzy, jumped on the racial bandwagon like a chicken on a junebug. - Reply to this comment
- People are starting to remember all the lies, misrepresentations, evasiveness of the Clinton years and how it continues now with how they have run a very negative campaign. I guess the chickens are now coming home to roost.
- Reply to this comment
- Carville is getting paid alot of money to say what he said. This shows you the arrogance of the Clinton (Bill and Hill) campaign.
So now people can''''t make personal decisions anymore? The Clintons always want to change the rules.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by ElizabethBJ at 01:28 PM : Mar 25, 2008
As will Richardson will be getting a lot of money out of Obama. Pro''bly more so.
Richardson is now old news, done deal, and he did it to himself. - Reply to this comment
Author Thomas Friedman on Obama's Afghanistan plan and the war on terror.
