Comments on: Obama Urges End To "Racial Stalemate"

Democratic Candidate Condemns Pastor's Divisive Remarks, But Says He Cannot "Disown" Him

[truthword08]

Obama Urges End To "Racial Stalemate"

- If Obama truly wanted to end the "racial stalemate" he would totally denounce that church and stop supporting his racist pastor. He would totally separate himself from that church, but he knows he can''t, because deep inside he has an agenda.

[hungry1968]

But if this is your only rebuttal to the facts about the ACLU that I just posted on here, it shows you are very desperate and lack character, purpose, and principle in your life.

Posted by TruthWord08 at 12:42 PM : Mar 19, 2008





Yeah - that''s it. The person that needs to rely on a book written by incestuous, cattle sacrificing, primitives based strictly on the alleged preachings of a mythological figure that never existed is telling me about lack of character, purpose, and principle in my life.

Yep - got it.

[truthword08]

Obama''s big Flip-Flop. He did hear Wright''s screeds while in the pew.
RealClearPolitics and the Huffington Post | March 19, 2008 | Jeff Head

Posted on 03/19/2008 5:41:55 AM PDT by Jeff Head

Last weekend on Hannity, Obama was interviewed by Major Garrett.

When Major Garrett asked him directly about if he had heard Reverend Wright''s offensive sermons, Barack answered:

"None of these statements were ones that I had heard myself personally in the pews."

Then, in his speech yesterday, March 18, 2008, he asked himself the same question again and answered it.

"Did I ever hear him make remarks that could be considered controversial while I sat in church? Yes."

These are direct contradictions...and reflect directly on the character of the man.

He did know of Wrights inflamatory sermons, of his hate, and disgusting vitriol for America and whites. He sat through it, he listened to it, and he brought his children to that trough to be fed.

Those attitudes and feelings have shaped this man over 20 years.

When you add to this his associations with Rezcko, the Weathermen Underground, his feelings about "patriotism" (ie. that it is false patriotism to wear a US flag on your lapel), his attitude towars the National Anthem, his wife''''s attitude about the country, etc., etc...a very distrubing picture of exactly who Barack Hussein Obama is becomes more and more clear.

Read more at realclearpolitics.com ...

[truthword08]

Former ACLU boss linked to child porn:

http://icanplainlysee.wordpress.com/2007/02/24/former-aclu-boss-linked-to-child-porn/

[truthword08]

jax and truth: you need to get YOUR facts straight and not from the book of hysteria.
Posted by pfd572

-Sorry, you must be referring to Darwin''s the Origin of Species by Natural Selection. That''s not our book sir.

The ACLU''s position is this: criminalize the production but legalize the sale and distribution of child pornography. This is the kind of lawyerly distinction that no one on the Supreme Court found convincing. And with good reason: as long as a free market in child pornography exists, there will always be some producers willing to risk prosecution. Beyond this, there is also the matter of how the sale of child pornography relates either to free speech or the ends of good government. But most important, the central issue is whether a free society should legalize transactions that involve the wholesale sexploitation of children for profit."

The ACLU objects to the idea that porn movie producers be required to maintain records of ages of its performers; this would be " a gross violation of privacy."

[truthword08]

pfd572,

So as long as "real" Children aren''t used everything is ok right?

You''re sick my friend. Very sick.

[pfd572]

jax and truth: you need to get YOUR facts straight and not from the book of hysteria.

[pfd572]

n a 2002 letter, the ACLU stated that it "opposes child pornography that uses real children in its depictions," but that material "which is produced without using real children, and is not otherwise obscene, is protected under the First Amendment."[87]

The ACLU also defended Lieutenant Colonel Oliver North,[54] whose conviction was tainted by coerced testimony %u2014 a violation of his fifth amendment rights.[62]

[truthword08]

pfd572,

The ACLU''s goals are plain as day in their own PUBLISHED print.

Your excuse that they have "evolved" out of these goals will never fly. Keep diggin my friend. You''re desperate.

[truthword08]

Obama''s big Flip-Flop. He did hear Wright''s screeds while in the pew.
RealClearPolitics and the Huffington Post ^ | March 19, 2008 | Jeff Head

Posted on 03/19/2008 5:41:55 AM PDT by Jeff Head

Last weekend on Hannity, Obama was interviewed by Major Garrett.

When Major Garrett asked him directly about if he had heard Reverend Wright''s offensive sermons, Barack answered:

"None of these statements were ones that I had heard myself personally in the pews."

Then, in his speech yesterday, March 18, 2008, he asked himself the same question again and answered it.

"Did I ever hear him make remarks that could be considered controversial while I sat in church? Yes."

These are direct contradictions...and reflect directly on the character of the man.

He did know of Wrights inflamatory sermons, of his hate, and disgusting vitriol for America and whites. He sat through it, he listened to it, and he brought his children to that trough to be fed.

Those attitudes and feelings have shaped this man over 20 years.

When you add to this his associations with Rezcko, the Weathermen Underground, his feelings about "patriotism" (ie. that it is false patriotism to wear a US flag on your lapel), his attitude towars the National Anthem, his wife''s attitude about the country, etc., etc...a very distrubing picture of exactly who Barack Hussein Obama is becomes more and more clear.

Read more at realclearpolitics.com ...