Comments on: Bush: U.S. Not Headed Into Recession

President Does Express Concern About Slowing Growth; Also Presses Congress On Intel Bill

[waflhiphilry]

TAX PAYER SUBSIDIZED OIL COMPANY SPYING!

S U C K I T MR PRESIDENT!!

[jjp735i]

I, like most of America, will be watching the House to see if they cave in and grant retroactive immunity from prosecution for the telecommunications companies.

Do not give Bush a free pass. If he did nothing wrong as he claims, then no immunity is needed.

[cbsblogger]

How many still proudly carry a Bush/Cheney sticker on the bumper.............and advertise their obvious stupidity.....LOLOLOLOLOL?

[mudrose-2009]

Tell me mudrose, why do you and Bush have your panties in such a knot over this intelligence bill?

"fully fund the Iraq war, to adopt housing legislation, andapprove a major increase in money to fight HIV/AIDS in Africa", right. Bush must think the American people just fell off the turnip truck!!!!

Posted by Oscarez

I don''t wear panties princess, you may and you may flounce about in your nightie too. This is about the House - ********, Pewlosi and The Weasel making sure that the ACLU can sue the telephone companies. They are putting lawsuits over the protection of Americans. Since these little socialist piglets are not privy to Intel, let''s consider them the Imperial House of Representatives. And you fairies should be very concerned about HIV/AIDS whereever it rears its ugly head. But you little socialists pigs just focus on what BIG NANNY GOVERNMENT can give to you for your ignornant mismanagement of your own affairs. Hahahaha.

[jersupporter]

It''''s awlful to watch this piece of Human Trash just keep up with this garbage. How in this world did we end up with something THIS bad in charge of this nation? Future Generations will look at it and ask that question. He NEED''''s to be in JAIL folks, he SHOULD be in Jail! Posted by MCVet
----------------------------
Fully agree - perhaps we should also look at funding Extensive Research for the #1 killer of man - Natural causes. That way Bush and his cronies could make even more money.

[singingrick]

Both Bush and the telecoms broke the law. Simple as that.

[mrmazerati]

George Bush couldn''t get a traffic law passed anymore. He needs to sit down, shut up and quit trying to legalize things after the fact. He''s irrelevant.

[mcvet]

It''s awlful to watch this piece of Human Trash just keep up with this garbage. How in this world did we end up with something THIS bad in charge of this nation? Future Generations will look at it and ask that question. He NEED''s to be in JAIL folks, he SHOULD be in Jail!

[newz4i]

There are already laws on the books which allow our government to use wiretaps. Bush ... and friends need immunity for those who broke our laws.

[omega39-2009]

What makes all of this possible is the support the foundation receives from its billionaire backers. Its nearly $3 million annual budget comes from 27 major donors, most of whom are members of "the Study Group"--also sometimes called the "Mega Group" because of their sizeable contributions--a semi-formal organization of major Jewish philanthropists who meet twice a year to discuss joint projects.

Leonard Abramson was the point man for establishing Emet. He, Michael Steinhardt, and Edgar Bronfman were the foundation''s board of directors at the time of its incorporation in the spring of 2001.

[omega39-2009]

There is an ad running on television around here using fear mongering tactics and urging people to call their representative to pass this bill. It is paid for by "defense of Democracies", from source watch:

Daniel McCarthy expressed an enhanced view of FDD''s origins in the November 17, 2003, issue of The American Conservative.[1]

In early 2001, a tightly knit group of billionaire philanthropists conceived of a plan to win American sympathy for Israel''s response to the Palestinian intifada. They believed that the Palestinian cause was finding too much support within crucial segments of the American public, particularly within the media and on college campuses, so they set up an organization, Emet: An Educational Initiative, Inc., to offer Israel the kind of PR that the Israeli government seemed unable to provide itself.

At first, Emet floundered, without an executive director or a well-defined mission. But that changed after Sept. 11, and Emet changed too, into what is now the Foundation for the Defense of Democracies. The name is different, but the goal of influencing America''s opinion-forming classes remains.

Continued...

[lorinkundert]

"No Bill of Attainder or ex post facto Law shall be passed." - US Constitution.

Any law passed that violates that would be void.

[fstop100]

G.W. and the word intelligence in the same sentence?

[hungry1968]

Yup, the Social Democrats. All in favor of open borders, free speech for any terrorist and no security for Americans. Don''''t you just love them?

Posted by mudrose at 09:19 AM : Feb 28, 2008





Hey moron - wasn''t Bush the one that was pushing the "illegal alien amnesty bill" last summer?

I still remember the look on his face when the DEMOCRATS killed it. He looked like someone just kicked his dog.

And you think that Bush has a handle on our security? We were attacked on 9/11 because his team ignored warnings of the al Qaeda threat in January 2001, March 2001, AND July 2001. How many warnings of a pending attack does he need before he has a handle on an actual threat of attack?

[oscarez]

Tell me mudrose, why do you and Bush have your panties in such a knot over this intelligence bill?

"fully fund the Iraq war, to adopt housing legislation, andapprove a major increase in money to fight HIV/AIDS in Africa", right. Bush must think the American people just fell off the turnip truck!!!!

[rowdytexan2]

Posted by mudrose at 09:19 AM : Feb 28, 2008

The FISA bill isn''t needed for a *** thing. Why pass a redundant bill? Our idiot in chief still has all the spy power he needs.

Congress is doing just exactly what it should be doing. They''re part of the checks and balances in this country. They need to be putting up roadblocks against Bush''s tyranny. This is a democratic country, it was not nor ever was meant to be a regime.

If another terrorist act falls on this country there will be but one person who is responsible for it and that is Mr. Bush and his regime. He''s had a trillion $''s to fight terrorists for 7 years. Congress does not own his failure.

[hungry1968]

Bush and intelligence.

Can you use those two words together in the same sentence?

[briannorwood]

I just don''t get it. Bush will veto any bill that does not grant immunity to the Telcoms for past crimes.

Isn''t this like admitting that the Telcoms DID commit crimes? Otherwise, why care?

The President in Chimp must think we are as gullible as he is!

[brianbwb-2009]

"No bill of attainder, or ex post fact law shall be passed" says it in clear terms in the constitution. No exceptions.

Not to forget the fourth Amendment which guarantees all Americans to be secure in their persons property, and effects from unreasonable search and seizure.

Since Bush obviously has no respect for the constitution, asking for new exceptions to it is ridiculous.

[mudrose-2009]

Once again, the Reid/Pewlosi/Hoyer gang thinks they have a better handle on the nation''s security than the President. But isn''t that what accusing the President as being an Imperial President all about? After all, aren''t the Social Democrats supposed to be in charge of all branches of government? What Pewlosi, Reid and ******** don''t see to realize is that if they think their fascist base is giving them a hard time, they have no idea what the rest of the American public will do to them if something else ever happens in this country again. Pewlosi is merely protecting the ACLU and there Intel lawsuits. Yup, the Social Democrats. All in favor of open borders, free speech for any terrorist and no security for Americans. Don''t you just love them?