Comments on: McCain: No Romance With Lobbyist
Republican Candidate Denies New York Times Report Alleging Inappropriate Dealings With Female Lobbyist
- I''''m afraid you are right on the mark my friend. Sure I want either Hillary or Obama to win in Novemeber but it''''s not going to break my heart if McCain wins. There''''s NO losing here for Liberals because as was the case with the McCarthy Fascist, a moderate Republican will sink them just as quickly. You see fascist need disputes and divisions. They need to have a hate target to focus all the disgust with the way things are. When someone is in the White House that will compromise and work with progressives to move forward, fascist simply dry up and blow away. We have worked with McCain in the past and with his age, I have little doubt he will be more acceptable to our ideals than ANYONE else right now on the Republican side. Sieg Heil Bush
Posted by MCVet
Lets to the Whiny Liberal Cheer....repeat after me:
Give me a p, P!, give me a t, T!, give me a s, S!, give me a d, D! what does that stand for ? POST TRAUMATIC STRESS DISORDER!!! who has a bad case of it? MCVET!!! - Reply to this comment
- Posted by tibu987 at 10:07 PM
No, that pilgrim guy speaks the truth. The reason why millions of people like me support Obama is that we are al Qeada operatives. When Obama becomes president, this country will be renamed the "United States of Al Qaeda".
Osama bin Laden will come out of hiding and be named Secretary of Defense. That old guy with the turban who does all those videos will be Secretary of Agriculture. - Reply to this comment
- pilgrimway.....
I see two possibilities;
1. You are a Clinton shill.
If not,
2. You are very naive and/or ignorant as to how the presidency works.
If not, well, I don''t know, but you should try to educate yourself and leave presidential election matters to others. - Reply to this comment
- Bush/Cheney/Rove/McCain
As*shole Republicans. - Reply to this comment
- If there was a secret radical Muslim in the white house as president what would He CHANGE? Would He CHANGE the way to make it easy for terrorists to get into this country to over throw this country? Would He CHANGE the laws for any of His kind? Would He hang out with those who supported tyranny? Would He impose martial law? Could He start unjust wars for His hidden ideology? Could His decisions CHANGE the course for America? Would He CHANGE your civil liberties? Last of all would He CHANGE your right to vote? Believe me when I say there are no one with hidden agenda%u2019s in this world! If there was a secret radical Muslim in the white house as president what would He CHANGE?
- Reply to this comment
- If there was a secret radical Muslim in the white house as president what would He CHANGE? Would He CHANGE the way to make it easy for terrorists to get into this country to over through this country? Would He CHANGE the laws for any of His kind? Would He hang out with those who supported tyranny? Would He impose martial law? Could He start unjust wars for His hidden ideology? Could His decisions CHANGE the course for America? Would He change your civil liberties? Last of all would He change your right to vote? Believe me when I say there are no one with hidden agenda%u2019s in this world! If there was a secret radical Muslim in the white house as president what would He CHANGE?
- Reply to this comment
- Looks like McCain will have to "come out of the closet" to set the record "straight." Didn''t they notice that he and Larry Craig always went to the bathroom in pairs? Time for him to make a stand----- a very wide stand.
- Reply to this comment
- Sen. John McCain has handled this matter like the mature politician he has grown to. The old John McCain hot-head would have handled this matter entirely different. In a national crisis this cool headed approach is what Americans will feel most comfortable with. Whether Sen. McCain is guilty or not he has already scored smooth-points in my book! But on a more serious note the New York Times is the nations newspaper of record and they have some pretty good editors working this story, so Sen. McCain is not out of the woods yet, you can bet with so much credibility and prestige on the line the NYT will come out with guns blazing over the next few days to support this story against Sen. McCain and so until then this story continues ...
- Reply to this comment
- GO Mc Cain, these stupid NYT people/editors R dum, WHAT r the y Trying TO do...THey say Cain Has affair with tht Women...who Cares..WHEN the Women HErselF say''s "I DIDNT have ANY affAIR with HIm." Dummies...LOOk McCain is the next PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES.wtvr happns he''s gonna with.THese POOR 3rd class tactics WONT work idiots.
- Reply to this comment
- JEGibbons,blah blah,blah blah.It''s a shame you can''t get a job boring people,you''re good at it.All your gobbledegook is like walking into a cluttered house that was decorated by someone with no taste.
- Reply to this comment
- This has to be a lie.everyone knows righties are mindless robots with the anatomy of Barbie and Ken.
- Reply to this comment
- Frankly, with all the important issues facing this country, McCain''s romances of 9 years ago are of no interest to me.
I am not a McCain fan and would not vote for him.
Let''s keep things in perspective. - Reply to this comment
- Omigod, McCain likes to have *** with women?
- Reply to this comment
- NYT may have done McCain a favor.......
If this goes the way of the infamous Dan Rather story and is proven to be flawed then no one will run another on McCain the rest of the campaign.
Actually, if this story is found to be unsubstantiated it might also inoculate Obama. - Reply to this comment
- McCain has enough friends in the media that he doesn''''t need conservatives to rally around him. And he%u2019s shown on numerous occasions (amnesty, campaign finance etc.) that he doesn''''t care what conservatives think except when he wants their votes. I''''m voting for Huckabee now, and making no promises about the general election.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by bdribus at 08:06 PM : Feb 21, 2008
+ report abuse
I''m afraid you are right on the mark my friend. Sure I want either Hillary or Obama to win in Novemeber but it''s not going to break my heart if McCain wins. There''s NO losing here for Liberals because as was the case with the McCarthy Fascist, a moderate Republican will sink them just as quickly. You see fascist need disputes and divisions. They need to have a hate target to focus all the disgust with the way things are. When someone is in the White House that will compromise and work with progressives to move forward, fascist simply dry up and blow away. We have worked with McCain in the past and with his age, I have little doubt he will be more acceptable to our ideals than ANYONE else right now on the Republican side. Sieg Heil Bush - Reply to this comment
- But there is an upside to this hatchet job.
CONSERVATIVES will UNITE behind Mc Cain over this travesty. No one champions the Times.
Like alien babies in the NATIONAL ENQUIRER;
whenever a reporter resorts to insinuation it''s because his facts are FOGGY.
If A BAD neighbor spread this gossip about you, you would likely take out a gun permit. GOSSIP is GOSSIP without substantiated facts it%u2019s not news worthy IT''S NOT TRUE!.
1) From a laughable news rag the NY TIMES. Mad Magazine is more reliable. Sorry, Mad Magazine!
2) Turns out the information was contradicted before they printed the other sources stating unequivocally that this never happened.
3) When all was left to the story was innuendo without verifiable reliable fact the TIMES went with this story anyway. Something the NATIONAL ENQUIRER probably would not do.
4) UNDISCLOSED ANONYMOUS SOURCES
this is the lowest MOST COWARDLY JOURNALISM
5) The timing of the story points to it being SUSPECT %u2013
Why now? Running scared to realize in a general election OBAMALAMADINGDONG is no competition for the decorated war hero with a distinguished Senatorial record.
MORE
Could the the NY TIMES Editor''s motive for running the story be any more transparent?
What has happened to this once revered newspaper? - Reply to this comment
- Dear Desperate
You know who you are. RU willing to vote for an UNKNOWWN COMMODITY who offers nothing but WORDS?
Hope & Change; words ONLY WITH NO tangible plan to implement the change. Then you misguided souls read an absurd, cruel INFLAMMATORY story about a noble man and you%u2019re ready to stake it as Gospel.
NOT TRUE!
How would I know? Timing and MANNER this story was presented is a convincer - Reply to this comment
- Buy low sell high, don''''t believe all of the propoganda you here from the media loons.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by jowand at 07:22 PM : Feb 21, 2008
+ report abuse
Well of course! This pathetic fascist will make MONEY off of you if you do! ROFLMAO Now if you are smart and know much about history, you''ll do something else with that money. We have a debt that would choke a horse, a deficit so big no one can count it. Banks are going to OTHER countries to get money to stay afloat.... just THOSE facts should tell you something. ALL the money is in the hands of the very wealthy that means there''s no money for the consumer to buy with. In short the economy is going down like a ship with a hole the size of New Jersy in it. Sieg Heil Bush - Reply to this comment
- McCain has enough friends in the media that he doesn''t need conservatives to rally around him. And he%u2019s shown on numerous occasions (amnesty, campaign finance etc.) that he doesn''t care what conservatives think except when he wants their votes. I''m voting for Huckabee now, and making no promises about the general election.
- Reply to this comment
- C''mon, everybody knows that the McCain organization leaked the story. What better way to distract the voters from his recent statements on the economy and Iraq?
- Reply to this comment
Mike Huckabee on GOP "rock stars," 2012, health care reform and more.




