Comments on: A Third Party Alternative To McCain?

Some Conservative Christian Activists Revisit Idea Of Supporting Minor Party As Alternative To GOP Front-Runner

Add a Comment See all 70 Comments
by oladywho February 14, 2008 4:04 PM EST
Prinzo:

"An Ultra-secretive council for national policy"
See paragraph 10 of the article. I didn''t make it up.
Reply to this comment
by bdrlnt4rl February 14, 2008 4:01 PM EST
i keep asking, but no responses.

why do christians say,''do what jesus would do'' but yet the do not except on sunday. oh, but they go out to eat after church, so they do not even keep the sabbath holy.

it really confuses me why they preach not to be hypocrits, but yet that is what the do on an everyday basis.

someone please help with me confusion.
Reply to this comment
by prinzowhales February 14, 2008 4:00 PM EST
So is the so-called "third party" looking for a Protestant Pope or a president?

An Ultra-secretive council for national policy? Man, that has a sinister sound to it. These guys scare the heck out of me. Religious fanatics leave no room for moderation or tolerance. Mr. Miaggi said it best,(paraphrased) "Walk right side of road, Okay. Walk left side of road, Okay. Walk middle of road, SQUISH, like grape."
Posted by oladywho at 12:53 PM : Feb 14, 2008
-------------------------------
And just what "secretive sinister council" are you referring to with regard to Third Parties? Just trying to scare yourself? "Prostestant pope"? You people are worse than the Neocons about making up nonsense and trying to scare yourselves with your confabulations.
Reply to this comment
by prinzowhales February 14, 2008 3:54 PM EST
Posted by LiberalVet at 12:14 PM : Feb 14, 2008
----------------
Then, I take it that you and other ''Liberal Veterans'' are against American sovereignty and independence? against the Second Amendment? and anti-Life?... you must be very well ''educated'' to have reached such a remarkable condemnation of those poor dumb old rednecks...like the ones who followed General Jackson to New Orleans and saved the city and prevented the British from controlling the mouth of the Mississippi River...the one''s like my own relative, Sgt Alvin York, who came out of the hills where he learned to shoot and thump the Bible a bit and won the Medal of Honor in World War I. Who do you want to surrender our sovereignty to, LibVet? our independence? our guns? Poor old rednecks...too dumb not to believe that the child kicking in their wife''s belly isn''t a living being....
Reply to this comment
by oladywho February 14, 2008 3:53 PM EST
So is the so-called "third party" looking for a Protestant Pope or a president?

An Ultra-secretive council for national policy? Man, that has a sinister sound to it. These guys scare the heck out of me. Religious fanatics leave no room for moderation or tolerance. Mr. Miaggi said it best,(paraphrased) "Walk right side of road, Okay. Walk left side of road, Okay. Walk middle of road, SQUISH, like grape."
Reply to this comment
by gunownerdan February 14, 2008 3:31 PM EST
Third parties are powerless. The dirty democrats and rotten republicans have totally hijacked our government making tons of rules to be sure third parties are not given an equal chance.
Reply to this comment
by liberalvet February 14, 2008 3:20 PM EST
Let the Evangelicals form thier own party. They will then see what a small percentage they really are. They have been leeching themselves on both the Democratic and Republican parties for entirely to long.
Reply to this comment
by liberalvet February 14, 2008 3:14 PM EST
The Constitution Party, which calls itself "completely pro-life, pro-gun, pro-American sovereignty and independence,"

Funny, that describes the typical uneducated redneck bible thumper as well...
Reply to this comment
by liberalvet February 14, 2008 3:06 PM EST
So the Evangelicals are not happy with thier choices....GOOD. America has not been happy since thier little Napolean want to be took office in 2000. Wake up you radical nitwits and realize that the MAJORITY of this nation does not believe in or want your so called values.
Reply to this comment
by prinzowhales February 14, 2008 3:00 PM EST
Posted by lochlan at 11:42 AM : Feb 14, 2008
--------------------------
I found an article from CNN...Your figures show that only 1-in-5 blacks chose a white candidate while 1-in-4 whites voted for a black candidate in the South Carolina Democratic Primary. More whites voted for a black candidate than blacks voted for a white candidates, so if you want to point to your figures as indicative of racism...it would be indicative of black racism in the South.
Reply to this comment
See all 70 Comments

Exclusive Webshow

Grammy winner Shakira on her music career, philanthropy and being sexy.. Watch Now

  • MOST POPULAR
Discussed
  1. Tempers Flare In Climate Change Flap

    (734 recent comments)

Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: