Comments on: Obama Looks To Ride Wave Of Momentum
Ahead Of 3 Tuesday Primaries, Clinton Dismisses Talk That Her Campaign Is In Trouble
Add a Comment See all 199 Comments
- So lets elect a Muslim President, who refuses to place his hand on his heart, pledge our flag, belittles everything this country was founded on, who has been proported to have ties with some of the most radical muslim goups across the world. Al-qaeda has been training men and women for DECADES to destroy us. The hate for us, has a long history. I have grave reservations about the man being elected, for the very reasons above. First off, as I have said before, I no longer believe in being of either political party, because I don''t believe there is ANY difference, that most of them, will all lie, cheat and steal to climb over the back of the next one. They all talk of CHANGE. The only change I want to hear about, is giving our country BACK to the people who work hard and support it. Some one who believes in the Constitution, and will BUST A$$ to bring it back into the forefront, to stop the greed and bloodshed within politics. Stop changing my country, for people who fled there own lands, to come here, because our way was so great. We are WHO we are, because of the wise ways of our long forgotten fore-fathers. Now, to my point.. HOW can we be sure, that this man, named Barrack Hussien OBAMA, not be a well groomed, well hidden, Terrorist, sent here to infiltrate our Gov''t, to become President, to help take this country DOWN & OUT?
- Reply to this comment
- Hey libra,Was that guy talking about Haglary when he said Hildabeast?
- Reply to this comment
- Clinton this and Clinton that,Gawd people,give it up.She''s a loser!I swear some of you people are so thickheaded,that if someone shot her in the head,you''d still be slammin'' Obama,and flappin''yer gums about how she''s going to win.Get a clue!It''s time for you ships to desert the sinking rat!
- Reply to this comment
- Well, according to party rules; the Super Delegates are not bound by primary and caucus results. The Super Delegates have every right to support whichever candidate they chose regardless of the overall voters selection. So since its within the boundtries of the agreed rules, its not really ''''stealing'''' the election, but I am sure it will certain feel like its stealing to most....
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by chitown639 at 11:27 AM : Feb 12, 2008
One would think so. The Clinton supporters will giver her a pass on it. - Reply to this comment
- HAS ANYONE EVEN NOTICED THAT OBAMA KEEPS SAYING HES GOING TO END THE WAS AT HIS CAMPAIGN STOPS, BUT IN AN INTERVIEW ON 60 MINUTES SAID "AS COMMANDER IN CHEIF HE HAS THE RIGHT TO ASSESS THE SITUATION AND CHANGE HIS MIND".
OBAMA KNOWS HE CANT JUST WITHDRAW FROM IRAQ SIMPLY FOR "WITHDRAWALS SAKE", CREATING FULL-FLEDGED CIVIL WAR, BUT HE WON''''T ADMIT IT.
THE DEMOCRATS, IN NO WAY WANT TO SEE IRAQ SPIRAL EVEN FURTHER DOWNWARD IF THEY ARE IN THE WHITE HOUSE. THEY DONT WANT TO BE THE PARTY THAT WITHDREW IN DEFEAT AND COMPOUND BUSH''''S MISTAKE.
I THOUGHT OBAMA WAS BEING STRAIGHT FORWARD WITH THE AMERICAN PEOPLE...IF HE KNOWS THAT HE CANNOT WITHDRAW BECAUSE IT WOULD BE A STRATEGIC MISTAKE...THEN ADMIT IT.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by lilvinnyb at 11:49 AM : Feb 12, 2008
Hillary was "for the war before she was against it". So was John Edwards, John Kerry and a bunch of other libs. Whats your point? - Reply to this comment
- Which one fits this best Hillary, Obama or McCain
Leadership (according to John Sculley) revolves around vision, ideas, direction, and has more to do with inspiring people as to direction and goals than with day-to-day implementation. A leader must be able to leverage more than his own capabilities. He must be capable of inspiring other people to do things without actually sitting on top of them with a checklist.%u201D Bennis, W. %u2018On Becoming a Leader%u2019 Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing, (1989, p.139)
"Leadership and learning are indispensable to each other." John F. Kennedy - Reply to this comment
- "prospect" should read "process" in my last post
- Reply to this comment
- Posted by frankIy6 at 10:59 AM : Feb 12, 2008
Hildabeast ? Hitlery ? Your derogatory name-calling convinces NO ONE. Please have a little respect for the democratic political prospect by showing a little respect for the candidates even if you do not support them. You have posted your content-free message over and over and over again across many days. I suspect most people just skip over it as I do, but it is merely annoying, accomplishing nothing.
You are clearly in elementary school and should pay more attention to your studies rather than wasting your time here. Good-bye! - Reply to this comment
- Obama has reached an all new low even for him. He is now playing the race card.
His hypochracy knows no bounds.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23122137/.
Hopefully all of you lost sheep Obamacins will wake up and see whats really going on before it''s too late. - Reply to this comment
- I think that the super delegates should take a real close look at how many Republicans crossed over to vote for Obama. If it is a significant number, they should ask themselves if this is really what the Democratic voters wanted.
- Reply to this comment
- HAS ANYONE EVEN NOTICED THAT OBAMA KEEPS SAYING HES GOING TO END THE WAS AT HIS CAMPAIGN STOPS, BUT IN AN INTERVIEW ON 60 MINUTES SAID "AS COMMANDER IN CHEIF HE HAS THE RIGHT TO ASSESS THE SITUATION AND CHANGE HIS MIND".
OBAMA KNOWS HE CANT JUST WITHDRAW FROM IRAQ SIMPLY FOR "WITHDRAWALS SAKE", CREATING FULL-FLEDGED CIVIL WAR, BUT HE WON''T ADMIT IT.
THE DEMOCRATS, IN NO WAY WANT TO SEE IRAQ SPIRAL EVEN FURTHER DOWNWARD IF THEY ARE IN THE WHITE HOUSE. THEY DONT WANT TO BE THE PARTY THAT WITHDREW IN DEFEAT AND COMPOUND BUSH''S MISTAKE.
I THOUGHT OBAMA WAS BEING STRAIGHT FORWARD WITH THE AMERICAN PEOPLE...IF HE KNOWS THAT HE CANNOT WITHDRAW BECAUSE IT WOULD BE A STRATEGIC MISTAKE...THEN ADMIT IT. - Reply to this comment
- The once-inevitable candidate now claims that she is "the underdog, not the candidate of the establishment, not-expected to win" person in all those past losing states and the states voting today. Hillary is sure turning out to be a loser. The billaries have tried everything, including playing the race card, and now pitting the African-Americans against the Hispanics in Texas. How much lower can this campaign go? The appeal of Obama is that he has shown he can unite the country as a whole, attracting voters from every color, gender and age. This is what we will truly need with hard times facing us. We need someone who can work with the republicans to bring change. The divisive billaries will bring more misery to the country than we have ever seen. You cannot and must not vote for this; we must remain united as a country and not destroy it through the ambitions of Bill and Hillary.
- Reply to this comment
Populist candidates scare the helll out of conservatives. For examples, see below.
lol!- Reply to this comment
- How is steeling an election considered a "perception"?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by hillaryin08
Well, according to party rules; the Super Delegates are not bound by primary and caucus results. The Super Delegates have every right to support whichever candidate they chose regardless of the overall voters selection. So since its within the boundtries of the agreed rules, its not really ''stealing'' the election, but I am sure it will certain feel like its stealing to most.... - Reply to this comment
- Obama Looks To Ride Wave Of Momentum
Ahead Of 3 Tuesday Primaries, Clinton Dismisses Talk That Her Campaign Is In Trouble
Just wait until the Clintonistas steel the election away from him via secret delagates.
What do you call that? Lib on Lib crime? - Reply to this comment
- True, the Super Delegates will back Clinton. This may give some voters the perception of the Democratic Party Elite stealing the election. It may disillusion the young new voters and blacks who support Obama. It could have a backlash effect. A divide Democratic Party can mean only one thing...President McCain
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by chitown639 at 11:06 AM : Feb 12, 2008
How is steeling an election considered a "perception"? - Reply to this comment
- Obama Looks To Ride Wave Of Momentum
Ahead Of 3 Tuesday Primaries, Clinton Dismisses Talk That Her Campaign Is In Trouble
Just wait until the Clintonistas steel the election away from him via secret delagates.
What do you call that? Lib on Lib crime? - Reply to this comment
- That''''s the part I''''m not getting. If the super delegates from the DNC decide, they will pick Clinton, not Obama.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by whatithink
True, the Super Delegates will back Clinton. This may give some voters the perception of the Democratic Party Elite stealing the election. It may disillusion the young new voters and blacks who support Obama. It could have a backlash effect. A divide Democratic Party can mean only one thing...President McCain - Reply to this comment
- Posted by chitown639 at 10:58 AM : Feb 12, 2008
Ap and AP ipos go get em.... - Reply to this comment
- La Times which endoresed Obama gets it
There''s more than a little truth here. It seems that Barack Obama can win blacks and that he can win whites; where he has trouble, electorally speaking, is winning blacks and whites.
You wouldn''t know this from all the resplendent rhetoric about Obama''s gorgeous mosaic of a campaign. Indeed, the audacity of Obama''s hype is a marvel to behold.
...............
Obama has had his greatest success winning white votes in states that are nearly all white, particularly those with caucuses. In non-homogeneously white states, he''s only won when he''s added enormous shares of black votes to his prosperous white liberal base -- as he did in South Carolina.
But in states that actually "look like America," he tends to get beaten by Hillary Rodham Clinton. He lost such melting-pot states as Nevada, California, Massachusetts and New York largely because he couldn''t accumulate nearly enough white or Latino votes.
.......
and on and on
rhetoric vs fact - Reply to this comment
Mike Huckabee on GOP "rock stars," 2012, health care reform and more.
