Comments on: Dems Raised Millions Each Since Tuesday

Barack Obama Has Raised $7.2 Million Since Super Tuesday, Hillary Clinton $6.4 Million

Add a Comment See all 77 Comments
by tazmjam February 7, 2008 3:23 PM EST
That''s a lot of money to raise so quickly, even if you have the support of the elite top 5%.
It would be interesting to find out who these large contributors are.
I think it''s worth investigating, because PAC and lobbyist money, no matter how you package it, is still...well PAC, and lobbyist money.
I have read some very interesting article recently on this subject.
Yahoo or google search: Obama PAC lobbyist Boston Globe... thehill.com...and the First Read-msnbc.. All have some very interesting articles concerning Obama and PAC, lobbyist money.
Reply to this comment
by chitown639 February 7, 2008 3:23 PM EST
(((themagic07)))

Come up with some new material, we have heard those same lies from guys like you for months. I really believe that when you post ridiculously inaccurate assertions, it insults the readers intelligence and serves as deterrent and undermines your intended cause. In short, your nutty comments in opposition to Senator Obama are really helping the Obama Campaign...

Reply to this comment
by singingrick February 7, 2008 3:21 PM EST


Posted by VastR-WCon

Is this what substitutes for real debate for brain-dead right wing-nuts?


Reply to this comment
by obama1289 February 7, 2008 3:11 PM EST
The winning ticket, Go Obama!!!
youtube.com/watch?v=jPev5sEdTjg
Reply to this comment
by singingrick February 7, 2008 3:04 PM EST



themagic07


Got anything substantive or are you satisfied to parrot someone else''s lies?





Reply to this comment
by singingrick February 7, 2008 2:58 PM EST


Posted by badaxmofo

Thanks for perfectly parroting todays fascist Republicon fear mongering talking points. Good parrot. Here''s a cracker.



Reply to this comment
by themagic07 February 7, 2008 2:58 PM EST
To all the ROOKIE SALESMAN supporters:
First: please wake up and don%u2019t be fooled by a phony: Here are the reasons why:

-what this rookie and REZKO have in common? Muslim%u2019s sons are Muslims for life. Blood is sticker than water. You can run but you can not hide.
-refused to say the Pledge of Allegiance. He did not want to offend ISLAM so he refused.
-claims he%u2019s running on his record.. He did not even know how to cast a %u201CYes%u201D or %u201CNo%u201D vote. He voted %u201Cpresent%u201D more than hundred times.
- had 17 years%u2019 old unpaid outstanding parking tickets. He should spent sometime in jail.
-insisted that his health care provides care to everyone, does he know what universal means?
-a fabulous orator, but we need more than words; we need a doer not a talker
-he says one thing and does another
-will meet with enemies without preconditions
-he said that he was not taking money from the Lobbyists. How about the Rezko connection?
-playing old politics as usual, after he promised hope and change%u2026.
-used to be a drug addict or a pusher?
-nexperienced, lack of accomplishments
Reply to this comment
by realpatriot1 February 7, 2008 2:56 PM EST
badaxmofo is presiding over the end of human intelligence.
Reply to this comment
by realpatriot1 February 7, 2008 2:54 PM EST
jb7022,

I guess that''s why he''s attracting more votes than all Republicans combined in almost every state.

How about some examples of these alleged liberal stances to back up your smear?

It sounds like you''re just repeating the latest lame talking point from the Republican National Committee.

In case you didn''t know, they''re becoming quite desparate.

Reply to this comment
by jb00722 February 7, 2008 2:43 PM EST
Given his extremely liberal stances, if Obama is the nominee, Democrats are certain to lose over 40 states in the general election.
Reply to this comment
by karutam February 7, 2008 2:41 PM EST
Sure she wants more debates. But aren''t we sick and tired of the same rhetoric aired every time? We know what our candidates stand for and their positions on different aspects. Repeating them over and over, and the direct "fighting" aired live is not endearing the party to any more supporters. It is just flogging a dead horse. The money and time would be much better spent in going out to the people and introducing yourself to the unconvinced. Many of us do not want to watch several hours of TV with both sides trashing each other''s views, or worse, at each other. We are sich and tired of this. Go out into different communities and try to convince those non-believers why they should support you. FORGET about more debates.
Reply to this comment
by choices2008 February 7, 2008 2:30 PM EST
How interesting THAT OBAMA HAS REJECTED ABC, NBC, CBS, AND CNN request for more DEBATES... he can take his SUPPORTERS MONIES... but can''t give them answers to his policies and positions! Is that not a Sales Job on Supporter Ignorance, masquerading as Cultish Blind Political trust???
Reply to this comment
by notopennshut February 7, 2008 2:18 PM EST
ditto BillyBob161. Many democrats feel the same way here in Michigan especially since the governor, in trying to help Hillary, as well as securing a spot in her administration (if elected!) has disenfranchized us so much that we would never vote Hillary, even if nominated. We will not allow MI''s delegates to be seated from the non-sanctioned early primary because we were not allowed to "vote", since only one candidate''s name was allowed. If the national committee would allow MI and FL''s delegates to be counted, it would send the wrong message to ALL others in future that you can break the rules, do what you want and there will be no consequence as we will return to business as usual. Let us, the voters tell them that they cannot play dirty, even as Hillary''s campaign is seeking to seat these same delegates. We are not a banana republic, and will end up a laughing stock of all those countries whom we have comdemned as "unfair election" or rigged. Ex-president Carter should speak up: he should know after overseeing so many election all over the world.
Reply to this comment
by rcamp11 February 7, 2008 2:18 PM EST
Of course she wants a debate every week, it''s free press and she''s short on money! Nice try Hillary!!
Reply to this comment
by realpatriot1 February 7, 2008 2:10 PM EST
His money is coming primarily from small donors while she is funded primarily by corporate lobbyists.
Reply to this comment
by alanrobisch February 7, 2008 2:03 PM EST
HILLARY IS JUST TOO FULL OF SIN FOR MY UPBRINGING TO STOMACH. PERIOD.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by BillyBob161 at 10:55 AM : Feb 07, 2008

amen
Reply to this comment
by billybob161 February 7, 2008 1:55 PM EST
AS MUCH AS I HATE THE REPUBES AT THIS POINT, IF HILLARY IS PRESIDENT, I''LL VOTE FOR MCCAIN.

HILLARY IS JUST TOO FULL OF SIN FOR MY UPBRINGING TO STOMACH. PERIOD.
Reply to this comment
See all 77 Comments

Exclusive Webshow

International recording artist Shakira on love, career and more. Watch Now

  • MOST POPULAR
Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: