Comments on: Obama: Clinton Represents Step Toward Past

In Response, Clinton Decries Tenor Of Obama's Comments

[croft777]

b-easy63
Wonder what this means for who Hilary will d1ck next?

Are you talking about yourself again?

[b-easy63]

Well, on the other hand, if Hillary would end up with the Democratic nomination, this dog and pony show might help her then. Who the heck knows what is going to help you or hurt you in politics. The littlest things, like Howard Dean''''''''s yell, can derail you, and the biggest things, like Jennefer Flowers, and no one pays any attention.

Politics is not for sissies!! :o)

Posted by kansas1946 at 08:35 PM : Jan 30, 2008


One other good thing about Hilary''''s "stunt" if she gets the nomination then turns around and ***** her Dems supporters in order to appeal to or court the Republicans--it is not as if she is not being consistent and they should have seen it coming.

Just like the neo cons who now bleat they were hoodwinked by Bush--Dems who blindly follow this person will be shown the same amount of sympathy. There was once a pilgrim marching up a mt, who crossed the path of a venomous snake. The snake asked for the pilgrim to take him to the top of the mt. The man said No, because the snake was poisonous. The pleading and refusal went back and forth, but finally the man picked the snake up and carried him up the mt. When they got to the top, the snake bit the man and as the man lay dying he asked why the snake had done that--after all he did for the snake.

This is what the snake said, as he slithered away: "You knew what I was, when you picked me up" good luck Hilary supporters......LOL

[b-easy63]

We need a president who can immediately hit the ground running, and Hillary Clinton can do that.
Posted by HillaryNow at 01:01 AM : Jan 31, 2008


Most of us have no doubt that Hilary can make snap decisions on day one. But the resistance comes from her record. Snap decisions are not necessarily great decisions or even right ones--we submit to you that after 4 years, Bush could claim a lot more experience in the White House than he had in 2000, and we would also submit that he made a bigger mess in the next 3 years than he had in the first 4. Experience in and of itself means nothing. We would also note, that Obama has had 10 years in the Senate which is greater than Hilary''s time in the Senate and that given her not so great votes to give a meglomaniac the option for war, to expand FISA despite the obvious compromise of the FBI and the DOJ, and to endorse torture--Hilary''s experience does not guarantee either rational or prudent thought. As an aside, we should note:

"If time in the Oval office could be counted as validation of a candidate running, Monica could run, as well as Hilary. " One hopes we think beyond the mantle of experience--for without wisdom, "experience" is just a continual series of unrelated events that a person never learned from.

[b-easy63]

Emotional masturbation!!!!!??..coming from a verbose dried up psychological PRUNE that''''s just so classic.

Posted by PAPEEHARA at 12:10 AM : Jan 31, 2008

congrats on the improvement. We see you finally learned how to turn the caps lock off, AND stop posting 10 times or more--now if, you finally learn how to behave civilly and combine that with actual intelligent dialogue, someone other than myself, might actually converse with you. Gotta love those Hilary supporters--the neo cons might fade into obscurity, but we''ll have reasonable surrogates in the "ends justify the means mindset" of the new Hitleryites.

Like I posted-- a win for Hilary will be like a continuation of the Bush years--this time with blue tints. Same mentality, different godette. Odds are, you''ll be one of the first ones bleating when ol'' Hil betrays her promises to you. ROTFLMAO

[hillarynow]

At a time when our country is in peril there are far too many risks in electing a struggling newcomer like Obama. There is no time for learning the ropes or rookie mistakes. We need to elect someone who doesn%u2019t have to learn on the job. We need a president who can immediately hit the ground running, and Hillary Clinton can do that. Hillary is ready for realistic change starting on day one, Hillary all the way!

[papeehara]

There is something to be said about informed decision making: more imperative since we are trying to decide on the best presidential candidate. Questioning the premise and veracity of Obama''s policies and ideologies is the first logical step in the decision making process.

Emotional masturbation!!!!!??..coming from a verbose dried up psychological PRUNE that''s just so classic.

[b-easy63]

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/01/3
0/opinion/pollpositions/main3769985.shtm
l
"The Hart-Mondale contest divided Democratic voters by age and by commitment to the party, much like the Clinton-Obama divide today. Younger voters, better educated voters, and voters who thought of themselves as independents were more likely to support Hart (as they do Obama this year), while older voters, less educated white voters and those who identify as Democrats were more likely to support Mondale (and now Clinton)."

Now why, does this come as absolutely no surprise at all? One would have to be somewhat mentally challenged or lack certain cognitive skills, to not note the discrepancies in Clinton''''s rhetoric and performance and to not see the deviousness of her particular campaign approach. Sort of like the way, we noted that Bush supporters must all hail from La-la land. Who knew that was where Clinton supporters dwelt also? If Clinton wins the election, get ready for 4 more years of la-la land fall out, while the Republicans crow and the Hilary supporters bleat: "who knew". Why, everyone but all of YOU--that''''s who. lmao

[b-easy63]

RATHER THAN WASTE OUR TIME WITH YOUR MINDLESS AND PETTY ABOUT AN ASSUMED INFRACTION ON MY PART, YOU SHOULD HAVE RESPONDED TO THE SUBSTANCE OF MY COMMENTS.
Posted by PAPEEHARA at 11:29 PM : Jan 30, 2008

Your comments were obviously a type of emotional masturbation. Though your continual spamming indicate you yearn for an audience, the tenor and rant indicate it was all about you and your view of everyone that is not a Hilary lover--that said, understand that masturbation is a singular activity and is best done sans audience. You are new to these boards (its obvious) you appear to also be new to the idea of decorum and discourse, as well. I try not to waste my times with emotional masturbators--participation from others is not what is really needed...LOL Oh yes--and Hilary is a lying opportunist too--great series of attributes being collected by the Hilary crowd--those of us who are not drinking koolaide, may not even notice the blip from the neo con days to the Hilary winning at all cost reich. lmaoay

[b-easy63]

RATHER THAN WASTE OUR TIME WITH YOUR MINDLESS AND PETTY ABOUT AN ASSUMED INFRACTION ON MY PART, YOU SHOULD HAVE RESPONDED TO THE SUBSTANCE OF MY COMMENTS. YOU WERE RIGHT ON THE BALL AT LEAST ONCE...I AM WISE. THANKS FOR THE COMPLIMENT!!!

Posted by PAPEEHARA at 11:29 PM : Jan 30, 2008


Ahhhh yes. Yet another uncouth and arrogant supporter of Hilary--whose lack of decency, manners, decorum and honor is reflected in the type of people who support her. Word again to the wise: If you take as much time dialoguing as you obviously do trying to see your words in print, you would have known it was being posted repeatedly--there is some understanding for your lack of knowledge--but whereas many who find out they are posting too much, apologize and explain the discrepancy--that is too much to ask from Hilary''s group. They are the neo cons of the Democratic party, --blind, super loyal, apologists for their flawed version of a goddette. Just sheeples with blue dresses instead of red--but still koolaide drinkers and mindless, lockstep automations. LMAO

[b-easy63]

Couric: Harry Truman said, "A man not honorable in his marital relations, is not usually honorable in any other." Some voters don''t feel comfortable supporting a candidate who''s not remained faithful to his or her spouse. Can you understand their position?

Biden: Look, this is really dicey territory. Let me say it this way. I think that one''s character, one''s honesty, one''s integrity, is a habit of the mind. I don''t think people can be dishonest in one aspect of their life, and compartmentalize it and be viewed as being honest in other parts of life.

If the tendency is to cut a corner; if the tendency is not to tell the truth; the probability is, that in a moment of crisis, where that person''s interests are at stake, they''re likely revert to the bad tendencies. If the habit of the heart and the habit of the mind is, that whether you''re dealing with promising the parking attendant you''re gonna be back in 20 minutes. Or you''re telling your wife something, or you are going to the nation and making a commitment.

There is -- habits are habits. And they all relate to, seems to me, how an individual values what they say as being important and relevant.

Wonder what this means for who Hilary will d1ck next?

[papeehara]

OOPS...CORRECTION TO Y PREVIOUS POST:
I MEANT MINDLESS AND PETTY "SENSITIVITY AND SENSIBILITY"

[papeehara]

Word to the wise papeehara--if you spam us with lots of the same post--you lose any credibility--we can differ and even debate with other bloggers--but we will not waste too much time on mindless, spamming automatons.

Posted by b-easy63 at 11:07 PM : Ja

BEFORE YOU ACCUSE ME OF "SPAMMING" I SUGGEST THAT YOU REQUEST MY INPUT. THE REASON WHY MY COMMENTS APPEARED SEVERAL TIMES WAS BECAUSE THERE WAS NO WAY TO CONFIRM THAT MY COMMENT HAD BEEN PUBLISHED AND THERE WAS NO MESSAGE INDICATING THAT MY COMMENT WAS BEING "MODERATED" AND I ASSUMED THAT MY COMMENT WAS NOT PUBLISHED. SORRY THAT I HURT YOUR HIGH BROW FEELINGS!!!

RATHER THAN WASTE OUR TIME WITH YOUR MINDLESS AND PETTY ABOUT AN ASSUMED INFRACTION ON MY PART, YOU SHOULD HAVE RESPONDED TO THE SUBSTANCE OF MY COMMENTS. YOU WERE RIGHT ON THE BALL AT LEAST ONCE...I AM WISE. THANKS FOR THE COMPLIMENT!!!

[b-easy63]

Word to the wise papeehara--if you spam us with lots of the same post--you lose any credibility--we can differ and even debate with other bloggers--but we will not waste too much time on mindless, spamming automatons.

[b-easy63]

You''''ve got all kinds of people supporting Hilary: the die hard, party faithful, those who were big fans of Bill Clinton, people who want a return to the old days, those who think Hilary represents the best chance, and those who think she is more experienced etc. But somewhere in there--Hilary seems to be making a big mistake.

For those who do not have blind loyalty or are not ruled by party dogma, Hilary''''s actions in Florida and Michigan give them disquiet: What do you think of a person who does not keep their word or honor their committments? What else is she capable of--is there a line she will not cross to win? Will she really do what she promises or are the campaign pledges something else she will dump or ignore if something better comes along? When rules, laws and promises are a matter of convenience and are discarded or ignored when an agenda demands it--NOTHING is sacred. Such a person has NO loyalty to party or the people in it--they will only help you if it furthers themself.

If this is not what Hilary wanted to reveal--she really should have thought of the ramifications of double dealing the DNC--because those who do not drink her koolaide will certainly rethink this.

[cfin5]

The Hill''n''Bill campaign reminds me of that Ray Stevens song "Guitarzan",.......shaddup baby Ah''m tryin'' ta sang!

[jedi08]

the guy who wrote that article backs Clinton. Typical propaganda and lies

[elsylee28]

Everyone has to check out the article %u201CWhite Voters with a Side of Hispanics%u201D on the blogzine Savage Politics. This is an awesome discussion and analysis on the current Democrat and GOP candidates and their eligibility.

www.savagepolitics.com

[agnim]

riskytime

Striving for a united and harmonious nation DOES NOT mean that we do away with the police force, right?

Striving for a united and harmonious nation means that one IS NEVER inclined to draw ''''first blood'''' against fellow citizens.

However, if ''''first blood'''' is drawn by a citizen, then POLICE ACTION may be warranted; because necessary police action IS part of keeping a united and harmonious nation!

After Iowa''''s crushing defeat, the classless Clintons decided to go desert the important national issues and instead decided to go negative and personal on the real ''''front runner''''.

That misbehavior on the part of the Clintons invited carefully targeted ''''police action'''' by the Obama campaign.
Striving for unity and harmony in a nation DOES NOT mean that good citizens just lay down and allow misbehaving citizens to run all over them!

ABCD = Anyone But Clinton Dynasty!

NOT CLINTON THIRD TERM!

[jedi08]

Billary Cunton is a liar, fake and part of the problem not the solution. She talks about taking on the Republicans instead of unifying. She has so much anger and hate in her because of what Slick Willy did to her for the last 20 plus years she thinks the Presidencey is owed to her.

No one will chose a former first lady over a war hero. that is laughable.

Obama is the Dems only chance now

She has no shot against McCain.

[papeehara]

THE AUDACITY OF OBAMALOT:

Frightening but true: non of us have a clue about the deeply entrenched Obama alliances to Raila Odinga, the Menyan Islamic Fundamentalist who is responsible for the blood bath in Kenya today and Obama''s half brother, another islamic extremist in Kenya.

".....nothing gives a clearer indication into what drives Obama than his tacit support for the brutal opposition leader Odinga in Kenya.. Aligned with Islamists, Raila Odinga has signed a pact to institute sharia when he takes power after the current bloody coup.

Odinga is a Marxist who reportedly has made a pact with a hard-line Islamic group in Kenya to establish Shariah courts throughout the country.

Curiouser and curiouser is the recent NY Post''s endorsement of Obama: FACT: the disgraced *** MORRIS columnist at the NY POST has a close relationship with OBAMA;s murderous pal Odinga:


"The left wing media has been played by brilliantly by Odinga - this is part of his strategy. *** Morris helped orchestrate that when Odinga hired him. ODM election strategy was overseen by *** Morris

That Obama suports Odinga unequivocally speaks volumes . What a dark glimpse into the soul of Barack Hussein.