Comments on: Clinton Wins Uncontested Fla. Dem Primary
Obama Campaign Dismisses Vote With No Delegates At Stake, But Clinton Says It's Significant
- continue...You must also be a republican, their idea is for Obama to win, he would be so much easier to beat then Hillary. So many woman haters. It just goes to show you how insecure some men can be for a woman to be in power. I know what it is, their afraid that a woman might make them look bad. That she just might be able to get this country back on its feet. Well for the real men out their who have nothing to prove, and who support Hillary, congratulations!
- Reply to this comment
- Everyone has to check out the article %u201CWhite Voters with a Side of Hispanics%u201D on the blogzine Savage Politics. This is an awesome discussion and analysis on the current Democrat and GOP candidates and their eligibility.
www.savagepolitics.com - Reply to this comment
- b-easy63
Promises are leverage she and Bill break with impunity as are vows to marriage and to anyone else. I said from the beginning even before this began , that my main objection to Hilary and indeed many Democrats is they have no conviction--no idea or moral that they are willing to fight for , even if they will lose--everything is for sale--even their position.
you obviously were to young or not born yet to remember the great things that Bill Clinton did for this country. He was getting us out of the deficit and even the economist were shocked, they couldn''t believe it, their statistics told a different story. Hillary has done many great things in this country, her dedication since the 1970''s prove this. Their promises they do keep, but unfortunately we do not have any proof whatso ever that Obama could live up to this. He is all words and no action. If anyone scares me it is him with his racist opinions and aggressive words he passes to his clan to proclaim. He has lied about the meaning of things he said, when we all knew what he meant. Why did he bring up about Reagan, that the republicans were the party of ideas in the last 15 years, it was a bash on Bill Clinton. Bill Clinton was in office during that time, and he gave no credit to Bill. Obama is very imature, very jealous, a racist, and a very aggressive man who if he won the democratic position would definately lose his cool with the bashing republicans. - Reply to this comment
- Klingon69
So why the concern now--and why did she keep her name on the ballot in Michigan after she knew all other candidates withdrew theirs?
The question is why didn''t Obama and Edwards keep theirs on? If I was Hillary, I would have done the same, it shows respect for that state. If you don''t know, Michigan has the highest unemployment because of so many jobs that have been lost, especially in their auto factories. This shows you who is commited and who is not. Who cares about the people and not about their selfish self wanting to run off to Nevada to get ahead of the game and still losing. I hate to tell you but the exit polls show that their is a big time racial line, its not going to change, Clinton will win. So, for those who don''t like it, be prepared go out and get yourself a box of Klenexes. - Reply to this comment
- b-easy63
One has to wonder--that if Obama had led in both states--does anyone think Hilary would pursue "seating them or acknowledging their votes?" Or if Obama had kept his name on the ticket when everyone else took theirs off does anyone think Clinton would have not cried "foul" and "cheater"?
as others have said: the law and the rules are just options to the Clintons--anything to win and they don''''t care even--how it looks to everyone else.
Sounds to me like an Obama trick. Quit doggin'' on Clinton. Clintons got it going on! The truth hurts don''t it? - Reply to this comment
- b48151 This cu8nt can''''t cry herself to the Whitehouse.Although,there are a lot of people out there stupid enough to vote for this piece of trash.
you shouldn''t talk about yourself that way. - Reply to this comment
- SDindepedantOf course she wants the delegates now..... but what if she did not get the most delegates. Problem with Billary is "they" do not represent anyone...they will say and do anything to hold office.... unfortunately at the expense of better representatives holding office.
Opportunists in the most un-scrupulous manner
This sounds like the case of jelousy. Clinton won by far, the truth is she won the hearts of four states, whereas Obama only won two, we know who the country wants as president, their voice will ber heard. - Reply to this comment
- Of course she wants the delegates now..... but what if she did not get the most delegates. Problem with Billary is "they" do not represent anyone...they will say and do anything to hold office.... unfortunately at the expense of better representatives holding office.
Opportunists in the most un-scrupulous manner - Reply to this comment
- One has to wonder--that if Obama had led in both states--does anyone think Hilary would pursue "seating them or acknowledging their votes?" Or if Obama had kept his name on the ticket when everyone else took theirs off does anyone think Clinton would have not cried "foul" and "cheater"?
as others have said: the law and the rules are just options to the Clintons--anything to win and they don''t care even--how it looks to everyone else. - Reply to this comment
- Straighten out this fact: Why did she not take this position in the very beginning instead of endorsing what the DNC was doing and agreeing to not campaign?
Her road sounds so lofty and noble--until you realize she was on a different road until there was a serious challenge to her "heir apparent" bid for the WH.
So why the concern now--and why did she keep her name on the ballot in Michigan after she knew all other candidates withdrew theirs?
Obama ran tv ads in Florida, because after Michigan, everyone knew what Hilary was up to--she hoped to get bids by default and by lying about what she had agreed to and why. Hilary is obvious--when your candidate is a craven jerk--don''''t be like the neo cons and do knee jerk defense to save her--admit it--she''''s a liar and a jerk--you might still support her and love her--but at least don''''t pretend she is honorable or kept her word--she didn''''t. Bush had Bushbots--don''''t be the equivalent of that wearing blue.
Posted by b-easy63 at 04:18 PM : Jan 30, 2008
Hey B;
You needed to address that to the person I was responding to, not me.
I agree, Hitlery lied and cheated her way into being eligible to run as Senator of New York. She showed up, gave a short speech and posed for many photo-ops in Florida(regardless of a closed fundraiser). She is scary, alot of Bills policies came from her twisted mind. I fear for this country should she be elected president. It will make Bush''s fiasco look like a Sunday picnic. - Reply to this comment
Author Thomas Friedman on Obama's Afghanistan plan and the war on terror.




